by doing this:
$ lsof | grep -i deleted
Pass the partition into lsof to narrow the scope.
Hope that helps!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/01/2015 11:45 PM, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting ~Stack~ (i.am.st...@gmail.com):
>> On 04/01/2015 03:27 PM, David Wright wrote:
>>> I don't recall seeing you post what you actually put into
>>> /etc/crypttab to test PARTUUID, only the erroneous earlier version
On 04/01/2015 03:27 PM, David Wright wrote:
> I don't recall seeing you post what you actually put into
> /etc/crypttab to test PARTUUID, only the erroneous earlier versions
> where you were still using swap's UUID.
Fair enough. Completely plausible I did something wrong as I haven't
used PARTUUID
On 03/29/2015 07:06 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> ~Stack~ wrote:
>
>> One more question if you don't mind: I understand why the encrypted
>> partition UUID is going to change every time, but the physical
>> partition UUID for my /dev/sda3 shouldn't change though. If
On 03/28/2015 06:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> ~Stack~ wrote:
>
>> In another post on this thread you asked where I got that UUID from.
>> That question fits in well here so I am just going to dump it all
>> here. :-)
>
>> I just checked a number of my syste
On 03/28/2015 03:37 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> ~Stack~ wrote:
[snip]
>> In my /dev/disk/by-id/ directory I have both "dm-name-sda3_crypt" and
>> "dm-uuid-CRYPT-PLAIN-sda3_crypt" which point to "../../dm-1". I can
>> not use either of those in my /
On 03/28/2015 02:15 PM, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting ~Stack~ (i.am.st...@gmail.com):
[snip]
>> $ grep swap /etc/crypttab
>> # causes systemd to fsck swap
>> #sda3_crypt UUID=ef2496cd-ca4d-43aa-8c90-dba084029f6e /dev/urandom
>> cipher=aes-xts-plain64,size=256,swap
>
On 03/28/2015 08:32 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> ~Stack~ wrote:
>
>> Remember back a few months ago when systemd wouldn't stop fsck'ing my
>> swap partition?
>
> Why would systemd fsck the swap? swap does not need fscking.
I have no idea. But, if I disable the sw
On 03/27/2015 07:35 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 27.03.2015 um 23:44 schrieb ~Stack~:
>> Yup. Systemd is ignoring me again and fscks on every boot. I have done
>> everything I can think of and I am back to not being able to stop
>> systemd from fsck'ing *every* time.
I haven't found anything in the last 6 months
that has helped.
Any thoughts or suggestions on this problem?
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am
not sure the exact thing I did. I got in and started mucking about with
the starting and stopping of systemd services and what not and now that
kernel boot skip parameter works! So at least that is working now. :-)
Though I think I might be ok with an every boot fsck that takes >2
seconds...
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/07/2015 08:16 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 at 08:39 AM, ~Stack~ wrote:
>
[snip]
>> However, I
>> *have* read the man page and the man page for fstab says "If the
>> sixth field is not present or zero, a value of zero is returned and
>> fsck w
as a
> precaution.
>
> You might never notice the clock issue if ntp or ntpdate is running and
> corrects the clock after the network is up.
Thanks for the suggestion. I did check that and the clock was off a bit,
but even after correcting it there was no change.
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/07/2015 05:21 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 22:13:26 schrieb ~Stack~:
>> In summary:
>> * I have systemd-fsck disabled just about every damn place I can find to
>> do so, yet it still runs on boot every time. I see it on the screen and
&
On 01/07/2015 03:10 AM, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 07:23 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
>
>> I keep seeing all of these posts online saying how easy it is to disable
>> systemd from runing fsck because it "honors" the '0' in the sixth field
>> of /etc/fstab
every time it says it is running a fsck
during boot versus the 2-3 minutes it used to take.
So I think I am just going to call it a "win" for now and go to sleep. :-)
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
7 ro quiet
init=/bin/systemd fsck.mode=skip
At this point I don't even care anymore if my disks never run fsck
again. I just want systemd-fsck to STOP running on EVERY boot.
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
? I know there are some really
good alternatives for trans-coding purposes (eg: handbrake) but I don't
know of any that will do ISO while keeping the important bits and
stripping out the junk.
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/25/2014 04:01 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 10:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 24.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> What do you get if your that program when your lid is closed/opened?
>>
>> The output of
>> $ cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/LI
On 10/24/2014 10:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> What do you get if your that program when your lid is closed/opened?
>
> The output of
> $ cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID/state
> when lid is closed / open would be helpful as well.
>
> If you don't hav
On 10/24/2014 10:23 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I extracted the lid state switch into a small test program.
> Can you compile the attach test program (make switch). I hard-coded the
> lid switch button to /dev/input/input1. You'll need to change that if
> that's different on your system (check with
On 10/23/2014 09:36 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 08:29 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> You can also change /etc/systemd/logind.conf, and change the
>> HandlePowerKey=, HandleSuspendKey=, HandleHibernateKey=,
>> HandleLidSwitch= all to ignore temporarily.
>
> Done. Tha
On 10/23/2014 11:06 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> That looks all fine.
> Can you remove the settings again from logind.conf and restart
> systemd-logind while monitoring what evtest logs and and also what
> systemd-logind logs.
> For the latter, you can either run systemd-logind in the foreground (as
On 10/23/2014 11:19 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>
> To the OP: Stack. THANK YOU for starting an intelligent systemd Q&A.
I have voiced my systemd concerns before. At this time, I am simply
tying to figure out what is wrong with my laptop. Should systemd be the
default/only init system w
On 10/23/2014 10:25 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.10.2014 um 04:58 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 24.10.2014 um 04:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>
>>> For some reason, you seem to be getting acpi events which trigger the
>>> suspend request in logind. This might be a buggy ACPI implementation
>>> lik
On 10/23/2014 09:58 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.10.2014 um 04:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>
>> For some reason, you seem to be getting acpi events which trigger the
>> suspend request in logind. This might be a buggy ACPI implementation
>> like in [1].
>
> To further debug this, you might inst
On 10/23/2014 10:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.10.2014 um 04:36 schrieb ~Stack~:
>
>> So while I was waiting on a response, I copied off the syslog to another
>> box to examine it (in only 3 tries! :-). There is a re-occuring theme
>> and it does look like I may h
On 10/23/2014 09:19 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.10.2014 um 02:40 schrieb ~Stack~:
>> I think I last booted/updated this laptop last weekend. I booted it up
>> tonight to mess around on it and the first thing, as always, was to run
>> updates. A bunch of sys
On 10/23/2014 08:29 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, ~Stack~ wrote:
>> It boots and it will sit at the log in screen for quite some time like
>> everything is good and happy. If I log in either via GUI (LXDE) or via
>> command line, the laptop goes to sleep anyw
On 10/23/2014 08:32 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/24 9:57 "~Stack~" <mailto:i.am.st...@gmail.com>>:
>> It boots and it will sit at the log in screen for quite some time like
>> everything is good and happy. If I log in either via GUI (LXDE) or via
>>
not making much
progress with online searching at the moment.
Can anyone help me figure out how to stop systemd from trying to go to
sleep all the time? This is quite annoying...
Thank you!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and getting riled up when they decided it
wasn't the time/place for it.)
If there is enough backlash, then maybe it will be the vista release.
But I honestly kind of doubt it. Many of the other Linux communities
swallowed the pill without too much disruption...
> The is currently no means to garner meaningful data about
> Jessie's approval ratings, which likely means the release
> team will, as usual, just guess what will fly. They've
> had an enviable run, to be sure.
Agreed. :-)
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/04/2014 03:57 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:54 PM, ~Stack~ <mailto:i.am.st...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> That makes sense. But why does it only fail on 08 and 09? Shouldn't it
> also fail on 01-06?
>
> Isn't that obvious? Unles
On 05/04/2014 03:42 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:32 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
[snip]
>
> verifiednum=`printf %02d $uservar`
>
> This works really well when they enter only a single digit or 01-07.
> However, on 08 or 09, this fails.
>
[snip]
>
't like what I am doing with printf but I
am a bit baffled as to why it only croaks on 08 and 09.
1) Does anyone know what is wrong here?
2) Is there a better way of solving this issue?
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ve up.
I think SELinux is good project and worth knowing and deploying. Just my
2 cents.
Good luck!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/09/2010 12:26 PM, Bob McGowan wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 06:00 AM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
...
>> What was your exact command line? Did you quote the regular expression?
>> My guess is that the shell interpreted the '*' character for you and you
>> ended up with a command line like this:
>>
>> $ gre
Hello everyone!
I ran into a strange issue with grep and I was hoping someone could
explain what I feel is an oddity.
I was trying to match a word that starts with either a _ or a letter
followed by any number of _, letters, or numbers. (eg: Good = Asdf1,
_aSD1. Bad: 9_asD ). My test text file is
that doesn't look
so scary? Have I missed something that makes all this pointless? :-P
Thanks!
~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ind USB speeds, there are
plenty of adapters you could use to have both online. However, if you
have a spare system ready to go that requires no modification then might
as well use it. If you don't have an adapter and your laptop can't use
both at the same time, it would be recommended to hav
40 matches
Mail list logo
