On 5/9/25 22:55, Stefan Monnier wrote:
the entire argument about keeping antique hardware in operation on
ecological grounds makes no sense except in a hypothetical world where
only two machines exist.
Clearly, there's a limit beyond which it doesn't make any sense any
more, but it usually makes
> What's the "embedded" CO2 usage of a nuclear reactor, I wonder.
And don't forget the energy that will be needed to dismantle it!
Stefan
> * If a new machine is genuinely more efficient (and we keep being
>told that they are!),
The capacity of laptop batteries has been stable around 50-100Wh for
decades, so the detailed and concrete data about potential improvement
in efficiency is readily available in the form measurement of
> installing any even remotely current release of Debian (or any other
> kind of *nix) on hardware over a decade old probably doesn't have much
> practical benefit, and is more of an exercise in seeing
> what's possible.
Hmm... FWIW, here are the computers I use on a regular basis:
- Thinkpad X30
> the entire argument about keeping antique hardware in operation on
> ecological grounds makes no sense except in a hypothetical world where
> only two machines exist.
Clearly, there's a limit beyond which it doesn't make any sense any
more, but it usually makes sense to keep operating old electr
On Fri, 9 May 2025 16:43:45 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
>
> What's the "embedded" CO2 usage of a nuclear reactor, I wonder.
>
Big power plants are obviously great consumers of power themselves,
some of the greatest probably. More notoriously, they'll usually need
lots of power to power up, nothing
On 2025-05-09 at 16:26, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>>> So it looks as if this will be fixed in Debian 13. Roger
>>
>> What leads you to that conclusion?
>>
>> My reading of the bug report I referenced is that the issue is that
>> the server is rejecting conn
On Fri, 9 May 2025, The Wanderer wrote:
> > So it looks as if this will be fixed in Debian 13. Roger
>
> What leads you to that conclusion?
>
> My reading of the bug report I referenced is that the issue is that the
> server is rejecting connections because it's receiving too many
> connections
On 2025-05-09 at 13:32, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> This looks like bug #1024830.
>
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, Kent West wrote:
>
>> westk@westkent:~$ speedtest
>
>> Download: 496.67 Mbit/s
>> VERSION_CODENAME=trixie
>
> So it looks as if this will be fixed in
Thanks for the update on the solution -- it could help someone else in the
future. (PS: Sorry about your fall and broken shoulder blades -- I hope they
heal completely and soon.)
On Thursday, May 08, 2025 04:22:08 PM Van Snyder wrote:
> When I reached for that mouse, my forearm was depressesing
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
> I have a very weird issue I can't quite trace, and I have no idea where to
> start looking. Maybe someone has a decent hint where to start debugging. It
> looks like some keyboard handling issues in Wayland apps.
[...]
> I tried to pinpoint issues and came up em
On 5/9/25 17:57, Roger Price wrote:
If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download, and 19Mbps
upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But when I load
Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
rprice@maria ~ speedtest
Retrieving speedtest.net configur
On Fri, 9 May 2025, The Wanderer wrote:
> This looks like bug #1024830.
On Fri, 9 May 2025, Kent West wrote:
> westk@westkent:~$ speedtest
> Download: 496.67 Mbit/s
> VERSION_CODENAME=trixie
So it looks as if this will be fixed in Debian 13. Roger
On 2025-05-09 15:54, nmanca wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a shared scanner in my home LAN from a Debian
Trixie server. So far, I followed the steps reported in [1]. I avoided
the ipp-usb protocol and relied on the older implementation based on
net sane backed as apparently my Samsung SCX-340
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Roger Price wrote:
>
> If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download, and 19Mbps
> upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But when I
> load
> Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
>
> rprice@maria ~ speedtest
> Retrie
On 2025-05-08, wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in this topic, so I've done a little research
>> online. Many folks look at energy consumption in terms of CO2
>> emissions, as a useful proxy for direct energy use.
>
> Thanks for the links! I'm interested in this topic, too (and
> am mulling to have a d
On 2025-05-09 at 11:57, Roger Price wrote:
> If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download, and
> 19Mbps
> upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But when I
> load
> Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
>
> rprice@maria ~ speedtest
> Retrievi
On Fri, 2025-05-09 at 17:57 +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download,
> and 19Mbps
> upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But
> when I load
> Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
>
> rprice@maria ~ speedtest
>
What is the latency for a Starlink round trip?
On 5/9/2025 8:57 AM, Roger Price wrote:
If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download, and 19Mbps
upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But when I load
Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
rprice@
If I visit speedtest.net and click on "Go", I get 356Mbps download, and 19Mbps
upload with multiconnection via Starlink and a server in Paris. But when I
load
Debian 12 package speedtest-cli I get
rprice@maria ~ speedtest
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from Starlink (216
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a shared scanner in my home LAN from a Debian Trixie
server. So far, I followed the steps reported in [1]. I avoided the
ipp-usb protocol and relied on the older implementation based on net
sane backed as apparently my Samsung SCX-3400 prefers that one.
The scanner is
Hi,
I have a very weird issue I can't quite trace, and I have no idea where to
start looking. Maybe someone has a decent hint where to start debugging. It
looks like some keyboard handling issues in Wayland apps.
I have switched from bookworm+kde5+wayland to trixie+kde6+wayland a few
months ag
On May 09, 2025, Rohin S Nair wrote:
> Dear Debian Team,
>
> I am experiencing a severe issue on Debian and Debian-based distributions
> when using LibreOffice with large fonts.
> When attempting to display content particularly with large fonts and black
> text the system becomes completely unresp
Dear Debian Team,
I am experiencing a severe issue on Debian and Debian-based distributions
when using LibreOffice with large fonts.
When attempting to display content particularly with large fonts and black
text the system becomes completely unresponsive and returns to the login
screen and no log
24 matches
Mail list logo
