On Wed 02 Apr 2025 at 09:12:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 4/2/25 01:28, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 01 Apr 2025 at 04:58:27 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 3/31/25 23:02, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Mon 31 Mar 2025 at 16:35:58 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > > On 3/31/25 13:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 16:07:36 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> But installing libdigest-sha-perl does not provide Digest::SHA256:
They are different modules.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Digest::SHA256
https://metacpan.org/pod/Digest::SHA
Digest::SHA256 appears to be much, much older and probabl
On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > I got a security error too. It says the problem is that the
> > certificate
> > is self-signed. I have no idea what that means or how to repair it.
>
> *If* you want to go down this road, the simplest way is to install
> one
> of the "
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:24 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:03:32 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > > > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site usin
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 05:34:35 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> The version of the applet in my taskbar, shows as 1.24.0 (copyrighted
> to Red Hat,and I believe that I have not used Red hat, since v6.0),
> from the About item in the menu, running on Mate
>
> Synaptic shows my version of Network Manager, a
On 4/2/25 16:18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 16:07:36 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
But installing libdigest-sha-perl does not provide Digest::SHA256:
They are different modules.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Digest::SHA256
https://metacpan.org/pod/Digest::SHA
Digest::SHA256 ap
On 3/4/25 04:00, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 .
When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it
identifies itself as version 1.30.0 .
I've also just noticed that NM 1.30 belongs on an older release of
Deb
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 .
> When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it
> identifies itself as version 1.30.0 .
I've also just noticed that NM 1.30 belongs on an older release of
Debian than 12.
On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site using the above IP
> > address and URL on port 80 but not 443. I got a certificate error
> > on 443.
>
> I've never before set up
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:03:32 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site using the above IP
> > > address and URL on port 80 but not 443. I
On 4/2/25 01:28, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 01 Apr 2025 at 04:58:27 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 3/31/25 23:02, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 31 Mar 2025 at 16:35:58 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 3/31/25 13:55, David Wright wrote:
I don't know why you have problems with using /etc/hosts for
On 2/4/25 21:41, Richard Owlett wrote:
I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 .
When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it
identifies itself as version 1.30.0 .
There is a link to http://www.gnome.org/projects/NetworkManager/ which
results in a 404 error.
I have qu
Chronologically it is
Apr 01 14:19:20 deb systemd-logind[741]: System is rebooting.
Apr 01 14:19:20 deb systemd-logind[741]: The system will reboot now!
Apr 01 14:19:20 deb umount[3537]: umount:
/mnt/8cd66b97-bde6-4475-b875-8f3928a8b14d: target is busy.
Apr 01 14:19:20 deb systemd[1]: Unmounting
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 .
> When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it
> identifies itself as version 1.30.0 .
> There is a link to http://www.gnome.org/projects/NetworkManager/
> which results in a 404 error.
I think the link sh
On 3/14/25 2:25 AM, Chris Green wrote:
Nicolas George wrote:
tim wade (HE12025-03-14):
besides rsync, do you know any other software/service for increment backup?
Ahem. rsync is not a backup tool.
rsync can be *part of* a backup tool, for example in rsnapshot, or
manually with filesystem sna
try here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/network-manager-applet
On 4/2/25 06:41, Richard Owlett wrote:
I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 .
When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it
identifies itself as version 1.30.0 .
There is a link to http://www.gnome.org/pr
> I expect that this mount is a part of local-fs.target, so qbittorrent
> and other processes started from user session should be stopped already.
>
Unfortunately i don't know what the local-fs.target is. Quick search shows
that it is probably a part of systemd, which (local-fs.target) is, i guess
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk (HE12025-04-02):
> Well, practically it makes no difference. If I send with or without an
> HTTP version I get the same Bad Request response. And it makes no
> difference whether I use HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1.
Does it make a difference if you send CRLF instead of LF, as Tom
Am 02.04.25 um 14:01 schrieb debian-u...@howorth.org.uk:
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> GET index.html
>>
>> should be:
>>
>> GET index.html HTTP/1.0
>>
>> (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but
>> most web
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 8:01 AM wrote:
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > GET index.html
> >
> > should be:
> >
> > GET index.html HTTP/1.0
> >
> > (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but
> > most web server
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk
> wrote:
>
>
> > GET index.html
>
> should be:
>
> GET index.html HTTP/1.0
>
> (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but
> most web servers are tolerant if you just send two )
>
> Not sending a HTT
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 17:52:55 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> > The server is on the LAN side of the router (192.168.1.65). It's
> > not in the DMZ. My server isn't running Apache ACLs or iptables or
> > TCP wrapper. The router is running a firewall. I've forwarded
> > WAN-si
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 13:01:10 +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk
> > wrote:
> > > GET index.html
> >
> > should be:
> >
> > GET index.html HTTP/1.0
>
> Well, practically it makes no difference. If I sen
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> GET index.html
should be:
GET index.html HTTP/1.0
(Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but
most web servers are tolerant if you just send two )
Not sending a HTTP version in your request /is/ a bad r
24 matches
Mail list logo
