On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
> The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
> webmail as a complement/alternative to their sponsored social media groups.
> I find the we
On Feb 26, 2025, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/26/25 12:20 PM, Dan Purgert wrote:
> > On Feb 26, 2025, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
> > > The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
> > > webmail as a comple
On 2/26/25 12:20 PM, Dan Purgert wrote:
On Feb 26, 2025, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
webmail as a complement/alternative to their sponsored social media groups.
I f
On 2/26/25 11:01 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2025 26 Feb 10:03 -0600, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built ar
On Feb 26, 2025, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
> The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
> webmail as a complement/alternative to their sponsored social media groups.
> I find the web based system unusable.
Amusingly, "listserv" was the name of one of the original email
implementations on IBM Mainframes on BITNET. Names were limited to
eight characters, hence that particular abbreviation. (JUGGLE-L was
one of my first subscriptions back then.)
Many modern conversation systems use both email and web
* On 2025 26 Feb 10:03 -0600, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
> > The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
> > webmail as a complement/alt
On 2/24/25 02:17, Felix Miata wrote:
> e...@gmx.us composed on 2025-02-23 16:43 (UTC-0500):
>
>> OK, I got it to show up by adding /etc/X11/50-onboard.conf which contains
>
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "Card1"
>> Driver "intel"...
> The intel display driver has been unofficially de
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
> The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
> webmail as a complement/alternative to their sponsored social media groups.
> I find the we
I'm communicating with a state level peer-to-peer support group.
The national organization has a peer-to-peer "mailing list" built around
webmail as a complement/alternative to their sponsored social media
groups. I find the web based system unusable.
I'm so old I used an acoustic coupler when
"Russell S." writes:
> Chris Green writes:
>
>> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> >
>>> > [...]
>>> >
>>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
>>>
Ok possible not the best way but running.
root@nmail:/# opendmarc -v
opendmarc: symbol lookup error: opendmarc: undefined symbol:
opendmarc_spf2_test
downloading the opendmarc from github and installed, running!
root@nmail: /# /usr/local/sbin/opendmarc -V
opendmarc: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2
thanks for your answer, it was installed, ok removed and installed.
but like the same error.
libspf2-2 is already the newest version (1.2.10-7.2+b1).
libbsd0 is already the newest version (0.11.7-2).
ibc6 is already the newest version (2.36-9+deb12u9).
apt purge libopendmarc2 opendmarc libspf2-2
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 14:35:22 +0100, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> Feb 26 14:26:10 nmail opendmarc[4891]: /usr/sbin/opendmarc: symbol lookup
> error: /usr/sbin/opendmarc: undefined symbol: opendmarc_spf2_test
Huh, that's wild. No obvious matches on a google search, either.
> root@nmail:/etc# dpkg
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 20:41 +1300, Lee Hinkleman wrote:
> Hi debian-user:
> Updates of Trixie stop on a technical issue, as quoted below.
> Thank you.
> Sincerely,
> Lee
>
>
> "
> DDependency resolution failed:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkdecorations3-6:
> Breaks: lib
Hello
Today upgrading me machine from Bullseye to Bookworm.
But since this moment the Application opendmarc dosnt start anymore
The error that found its
Feb 26 14:26:10 nmail opendmarc[4891]: /usr/sbin/opendmarc: symbol lookup
error: /usr/sbin/opendmarc: undefined symbol: opendmarc_spf2_tes
On 2/25/25 19:47, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 23 Feb 2025 at 09:47:41 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
On 2/23/25 00:00, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 07:29:15 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
[ … ]
read all that in the drive label. There was a time when seagate made
good hard drives. One
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 04:28:22AM +, Han, Yuguang wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Hope this email find you well.
>
> This is an AWS user. Here my customer wants to use Debian12 latest AMI in AWS
> Malaysia region ap-southeast-5. But didn’t see it in the marketplace support
> list.
>
> https://aws.amazon
Hi debian-user:
Updates of Trixie stop on a technical issue, as quoted below.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Lee
"
DDependency resolution failed:
The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkdecorations3-6:
Breaks: libkdecorations2-6 but 4:6.2.5-1 is to be installed
"
19 matches
Mail list logo
