On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 23:50:05 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2024-10-25 14:08 (UTC-0500):
> > On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 13:51:06 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Manual editing of /boot/grub/grub.cfg does not persist. Every kernel
> >> addition or
> >> removal causes its re
David Wright composed on 2024-10-25 14:08 (UTC-0500):
> On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 13:51:06 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Manual editing of /boot/grub/grub.cfg does not persist. Every kernel
>> addition or
>> removal causes its regeneration anew based upon the content of
>> /etc/default/grub
>> and
On 26/10/2024 02:03, Hans wrote:
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
Try extundelete.
[...]
Using an image, you can try nice tools like foremost, scalpel or autopsy to
recover files.
A
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 13:30:25 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: David Wright
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:13:50 -0500
> > You took out the tail!
>
> Appears we're at crossed purposes. You catted /etc/grub.d/40_custom.
> I posted /boot/grub/grub.cfg.
>
> My 40_custom has the "ex
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
From: Felix Miata
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:55:37 -0400
Instead of 40_custom, I use 41_custom, but copied to 07_custom.
You have two copies of the custom configuration. One in
/etc/grub.d/07_custom and one in /etc/grub.d/41_custom. Correc
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 13:51:06 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> My actual custom stanzas are in /boot/grub2/custom.cfg, because I use only one
> bootloader per PC, no matter how many installations it contains, which
> averages in
> excess of 20, and I use whatever version of Grub2 that Tumbleweed pro
From: David Wright
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:13:50 -0500
> You took out the tail!
Appears we're at crossed purposes. You catted /etc/grub.d/40_custom.
I posted /boot/grub/grub.cfg.
My 40_custom has the "exec tail" line as you posted and produces a
stanza in /boot/grub/grub.cfg appeari
David Wright composed on 2024-10-25 14:08 (UTC-0500):
> On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 13:51:06 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> My actual custom stanzas are in /boot/grub2/custom.cfg, because I use only
>> one
>> bootloader per PC, no matter how many installations it contains, which
>> averages in
>> exc
Thanks Hans,I will try these step.
- 原始邮件 -
发件人：Hans
收件人：debian-user@lists.debian.org
主题：Re: recover files
日期：2024年10月26日 03点04分
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
> Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted file
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 09:19:30 (-0400), eben@somewhere wrote:
> > Not using synaptic, I don't know why that path was chosen. But
> > you'd need world-execute all the way down from /root itself.
>
> Well the chmod thing is not acceptable.
Totally reasonable; any world-readable file in /root
would
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 11:33:37 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> The /boot/grub/grub.cfg created by update-grub2 is at
> https://easthope.ca/grub.cfg . My 40_custom stanza is there but not
> in the boot menu. If someone can spot an error, good, thanks.
You took out the tail!
It should look
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
> Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
>
Try extundelete.
Hint: Make an image from the whole partition using dd before do any recover
tries. Then use the ima
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:54:58PM -0300, Bruno Schneider wrote:
> I noticed that I have hundreds of files whose names start with
> "popularity-contest" in /var/log. They don't even seem to be logs.
> They seem to be data that popularity-contest sends away.
popularity-contest does log to the
I noticed that I have hundreds of files whose names start with
"popularity-contest" in /var/log. They don't even seem to be logs.
They seem to be data that popularity-contest sends away.
Has anyone else noticed this? Is this a bug? It seems they are in the
wrong place or, at least, logrotate shoul
Joe & all,
From: Joe
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:06:21 +0100
> Modern drives use GPT partitioning, and modern computers generally have
> UEFI firmware rather than BIOS.
The machine here is ThinkCentre 1S3237C13MJTVBGW. Older than
machines commonplace now.
It has UEFI but I couldn't
Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 08:26:21 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: David Wright
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:22:19 -0500
> > So you've got a stable/testing/unstable system on hd1?
>
> hd1 has Void Linux. They don't use the stable/testing/unstable terminology.
I'm looking at your sy
peter composed on 2024-10-25 09:23 (UTC-0700):
> You have two copies of the custom configuration. One in
> /etc/grub.d/07_custom and one in /etc/grub.d/41_custom. Correct?
> Are both entries in the menu? Only the one from 07_custom?
> The immediate puzzle here is the custom menu entry in
>
From: Felix Miata
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:55:37 -0400
> Instead of 40_custom, I use 41_custom, but copied to 07_custom.
You have two copies of the custom configuration. One in
/etc/grub.d/07_custom and one in /etc/grub.d/41_custom. Correct?
Are both entries in the menu? Only the on
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:26:21 -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> A new-to-me detail is hd0 having FAT and hd1 having GPT.
> According to this, OK for Grub2.
> https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html#BIOS-installation
FAT is a type of file system. The disk partitioning table type
On 25/10/2024 23:06, Joe wrote:
On 25 Oct 2024 08:26:21 -0700 pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
A new-to-me detail is hd0 having FAT and hd1 having GPT.
According to this, OK for Grub2.
[...]
Modern drives use GPT partitioning, and modern computers generally have
UEFI firmware rather than BIOS. The EF
On 25 Oct 2024 08:26:21 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: David Wright
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:22:19 -0500
> > So you've got a stable/testing/unstable system on hd1?
>
> hd1 has Void Linux. They don't use the stable/testing/unstable
> terminology.
>
> > And a 14-month old bu
On 10/25/24 07:35, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:33:24 +0100, Joe wrote:
I was assuming someone setting up a server of some kind would not be
running a DHCP client, which of course can be done with a reservation,
but it's another potential point of failure that a fixed address
From: David Wright
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:22:19 -0500
> So you've got a stable/testing/unstable system on hd1?
hd1 has Void Linux. They don't use the stable/testing/unstable terminology.
> And a 14-month old bullseye system on hd0, which is currently running?
Yes.
root@imager:~# cat
OK, It will be some simple thing. I have the original install backed up
somewhere so will compare the configurations.
I found out what "source" does.
Thanks to Karl also for the Mutt, msmtp tips.
cheers
mick
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 13:08, Michel Verdier wrote:
> On 2024-10-24, aces and eights wro
On 10/24/24 22:20, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096
Eben, don't worry, got into same issue with some mails sent from debian.
These are then marked with the "*SPAM*" tag in the header, althpough
it is no spam. It as someting to do with DKIM. I already noticed debian of it,
but they say, they are not responsible and some other mailer is do
I've used Debian since days of Squeeze. My desktop was Gnome2 until MATE
was released (found Gnome3 uncomfortable).
I've been using Debian 9 with MATE and /home on its own partition.
I've installed all of Debian 12 (w MATE) to a single partition.
Is the content of Mate's Power Management help
On 10/24/24 22:33, David Wright wrote:
> Anyway, it appears I can't reply to eben's posts in this thread but,
> if this gets through, I can reply to my own. (And to Daniel Roberts
> earlier.) What triggers their spam detector software, presumably
> "mailclean11", I have no idea.
I don't know why
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:33:24 +0100, Joe wrote:
> I was assuming someone setting up a server of some kind would not be
> running a DHCP client, which of course can be done with a reservation,
> but it's another potential point of failure that a fixed address
> configuration doesn't have.
I've s
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:36:20AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:03:43 +0100
> Chris Green wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, OP here again, that's why I said in my original post "(I know
> > they're not quite the same thing, but the result works OK)"
> > I think (on Ubuntu it did anyway) that sys
On 2024-10-24, aces and eights wrote:
> ~$ systemctl status apache2.service
[...]
Your config is ok.
>> > $ apache2 -V
I miss this point: you should use apachectl -V or apache2ctl -V if you
want to look at your running apache with all default values set
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:31:18 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote:
> > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to
> > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP
> > address.
>
> OK. I'm guessing that's not r
pe...@easthope.ca composed on 2024-10-24 12:52 (UTC-0700):
> So far, good, but when booting the Void entry is absent.
> https://easthope.ca/GrubMenu.jpg
> Ideas?
Why I don't know, but:
Instead of 40_custom, I use 41_custom, but copied to 07_custom. Grub.cfg then
reads custom entries from /boot/
Dunno, if it is correct:
I fell into the same issue. Just deleted the complete folder, then started
synaptic again and the folder was new created = issue gone.
Not sure, if this is enough. Maybe the reason is, debian is working on umask
settings and (as far as I read), there is normally no "def
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [-- text/plain, size 1.2K, charset utf-8, 34 lines, encoding quoted-printable
> --]
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:31:18PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote:
> > > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be ex
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote:
> > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to
> > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP address.
>
> OK. I'm guessing that's not relevant here, though.
>
> > If
> > you're
37 matches
Mail list logo
