Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:27:01PM +0200, Christian Groessler wrote: [...] > Now for the main question: Why do you need ancient Debian? Was in the original post: "This is to build some ancient software." (I've been in a similar situation myself) Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP si

docker buildx plugin

Hello, On a Bookworm system results `DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1 docker build .` in a succesfull build. On an unstable system results `DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1 docker build .` in this output: |ERROR: BuildKit is enabled but the buildx componet is missing or broken. | Install the buildx component to build im

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

Hi Tim, On 9/14/24 6:32 PM, Tim Woodall wrote: On Sat, 14 Sep 2024, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 14 Sep 2024 16:15 +0100, from debianu...@woodall.me.uk (Tim Woodall): Is there anywhere I can download really, really ancient debian images. I need potato or older (i386). I'd like a mountable disk

Re: [SUMMARY] UEFI multiboot

Hi, Felix Miata wrote: > Which distros ship rEFInd? It's not among packages monitored by distrowatch. It seems that Debian does since a while: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/refind The tracker page points by its "homepage" link to https://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ which shows the name "rEFIn

Re: [SUMMARY] UEFI multiboot

songbird composed on 2024-09-14 13:07 (UTC-0400): > Felix Miata wrote: >> Max Nikulin composed on 2024-09-14 10:59 (UTC+0700): >>> So multiple loaders from the same vendor is tricky in the case of UEFI >>> SecureBoot. Behavior of grub may vary across Linux distributions. >> Thus, consider to K

Re: [SUMMARY] UEFI multiboot

Felix Miata wrote: > Max Nikulin composed on 2024-09-14 10:59 (UTC+0700): > >> So multiple loaders from the same vendor is tricky in the case of UEFI >> SecureBoot. Behavior of grub may vary across Linux distributions. > > Thus, consider to KISS. Pick one installation's bootloader to depend on. >

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 14 Sep 2024 16:15 +0100, from debianu...@woodall.me.uk (Tim Woodall): Is there anywhere I can download really, really ancient debian images. I need potato or older (i386). I'd like a mountable disk image. And, of course, as soon as I sent that I

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024, Tom Furie wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 04:15:46PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote: The oldest backups I still have go back to 2006 which, sadly, is way too modern. Checking the potato release information says security updates were discontinued in 2003. I switched from Redhat to

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On 14 Sep 2024 16:15 +0100, from debianu...@woodall.me.uk (Tim Woodall): >> Is there anywhere I can download really, really ancient debian images. I >> need potato or older (i386). I'd like a mountable disk image. > > And, of course, as soon as I sent that I found a potato CD on > archive.org. Dow

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 04:15:46PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote: > > The oldest backups I still have go back to 2006 which, sadly, is way too > > modern. Checking the potato release information says security updates > > were discontinued in 2003. I switched from Redhat to Debian around that > > time s

Re: Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024, Tim Woodall wrote: Is there anywhere I can download really, really ancient debian images. I need potato or older (i386). I'd like a mountable disk image. I have no idea if debootstrap supports this, I haven't tried (yet), I was hoping there was somewhere I could download an

Really ancient debian images? (potato or older)

Is there anywhere I can download really, really ancient debian images. I need potato or older (i386). I'd like a mountable disk image. I have no idea if debootstrap supports this, I haven't tried (yet), I was hoping there was somewhere I could download an image. This is to build some ancient sof

Re: old kernel appears more stable than latest

Thank Busby! i compose email in freebsd on pc1, its time is incorrect problem is with pc2 running deb12 though its time is correct more detail about my problem, it arise in sleep mode, i can't see any error or warning msg (it enters sleep mode after mouse/keyboard inactivity for some time)

Re: unwanted crontab message

On 13 Sep 2024 17:53 -0400, from g...@wooledge.org (Greg Wooledge): > For the record, Debian 12 has vim 9.0.x and a /usr/share/vim/vim90/ > directory. According to ... oh, > that web page is not responding for me. Sorry, I can't check what > version(s) of Debian m

Re: old kernel appears more stable than latest

On 14/9/24 15:49, hlyg wrote: You might want to check your system time, and/or your system timezone. .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..