Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Thu 11 Apr 2024 at 03:36:59 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the "default state" in > > one installation and not the other. > > Both machines have always been usr-merged (i.e. from the Debian >

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the "default state" in > one installation and not the other. Both machines have always been usr-merged (i.e. from the Debian installation). -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100%

Re: HDD long-term data storage with ensured integrity

On 4/10/24 08:49, Paul Leiber wrote: Am 10.04.2024 um 13:10 schrieb David Christensen: Does the Btrfs in Debian 11 or Debian 12 still require manual maintenance?  If so, what and how often? Scrub and balance are actions which have been recommended. I am using btrfsmaintenance scripts [1][2] t

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 7:00 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 202

Re: HDD long-term data storage with ensured integrity

Am 10.04.2024 um 13:10 schrieb David Christensen: On 4/9/24 17:08, piorunz wrote: On 02/04/2024 13:53, David Christensen wrote: Does anyone have any comments or suggestions regarding how to use magnetic hard disk drives, commodity x86 computers, and Debian for long-term data storage with ensur

Re: HDD long-term data storage with ensured integrity

On 2024-04-10, David Christensen wrote: >> >> I use Btrfs, on all my systems, including some servers, with soft Raid1 >> and Raid10 modes (because these modes are considered stable and >> production ready). I decided on Btrfs not ZFS, because Btrfs allows to >> migrate drives on the fly while par

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Wed 10 Apr 2024 at 12:33:21 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root roo

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Apr 10, 2024, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2024-01-0

Re: HDD long-term data storage with ensured integrity

On 4/9/24 17:08, piorunz wrote: On 02/04/2024 13:53, David Christensen wrote: Does anyone have any comments or suggestions regarding how to use magnetic hard disk drives, commodity x86 computers, and Debian for long-term data storage with ensured integrity? I use Btrfs, on all my systems, inc

inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

Hi, On one machine, I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket and on another one, I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2024-01-05 16:54:09 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.

Re: Testing amd64 netinst LUKS+LVM install broken

On 2024-04-10 at 02:39, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:51:26PM -0700, Craig Hesling wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having an issue with the guided partitioner in the Debian >> testing amd64 installer. Specifically, the "Guided - use entire >> disk and set up encrypted LVM"