On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:19:20PM -0700, Jon Folsom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In a fresh installation of Bookworm, up-to-date as of today, there is a
> problem with CUPS printer configuration. I'm not sure which package to file
> a bug report against. I'll give a summary here; please let me know which
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:17:34PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:55:12PM -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> > Setting up mysql-common (8.0.34-1debian11) ...
>
> This package did not come from Debian.
[…]
> If your third-party MySQL packages are not working, y
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:55:12PM -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> Setting up mysql-common (8.0.34-1debian11) ...
This package did not come from Debian. That's not a Debian version
string (*none* of them have that pattern, with the literal word "debian"
in between numbers), and besides, look
*I try to update, upgrade my operating system but i get the following
error:*
Setting up mysql-common (8.0.34-1debian11) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative path /etc/mysql/my.cnf.fallback
doesn't
exist
dpkg: error processing package mysql-common (--configure):
installed mysql-common pack
Hello,
In a fresh installation of Bookworm, up-to-date as of today, there is a
problem with CUPS printer configuration. I'm not sure which package to file
a bug report against. I'll give a summary here; please let me know which
package I should reference using `reportbug`.
I have a network printe
> I would like to discover which currently installed packages in Bullseye (11)
> will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian repository) in Bookworm
> (12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
> It might be that there is a list of the more than 6,296 packages removed as
> obsolete (
Dear community,
I encountered an issue while upgrading the 'util-linux' package using Apt - it
hanged until I terminated it by force. This was resolved by commenting out
lines from dpkg's corresponding postinst script which tries to start
fstrim.timer. Namely this one:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/util-li
On Thu 20 Jul 2023 at 14:31:43 (-0500), kjohn...@eclypse.org wrote:
> I would like to discover which currently installed packages in Bullseye (11)
> will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian repository) in Bookworm
> (12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
>
> It might be that ther
On 2023-07-20 14:31 -0500, kjohn...@eclypse.org wrote:
> I would like to discover which currently installed packages in
> Bullseye (11) will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian
> repository) in Bookworm (12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
>
> It might be that there is a list of
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:31:43 -0500
wrote:
> I would like to discover which currently installed packages in
> Bullseye (11) will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian
> repository) in Bookworm (12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
You can get some of that from the release notes.
-
kjohn...@eclypse.org wrote:
> I would like to discover which currently installed packages in Bullseye (11)
> will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian repository) in Bookworm
> (12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
>
> It might be that there is a list of the more than 6,296 pack
I would like to discover which currently installed packages in Bullseye (11)
will be obsolete (no longer available from a Debian repository) in Bookworm
(12) _before starting the upgrade process_.
It might be that there is a list of the more than 6,296 packages removed as
obsolete (source: Debi
On Thu 20 Jul 2023 at 16:36:44 (+0530), Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> I want to have other users run my python script on their computers,
> that don't have python installer, as a standalone binary/executable.
>
> I searched the debian-user ML with the string, "standalone python
> binary executable" but w
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, Susmita/Rajib wrote:
I want to have other users run my python script on their computers,
that don't have python installer, as a standalone binary/executable.
This is the wrong list. It's a 12 year old question. A Google search would
have given you
https://stackoverflow
Hi Shawn,
this sounds like a bug in the cloud images.
Not quite sure, why they need the netdev (system) group, but if that
user is created by them, they should do so as a system user.
Could you please inform the cloud image maintainers?
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Cloud
https://salsa.debian
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 04:36:44PM +0530, Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> My dear Illustrious leaders and senior List Maintainers of Debian Users ML,
Is there some reason that you only want answers from "leaders" and
"senior List Maintainers" as opposed to the vast majority of list
subscribers, like y
Hi everyone, trying to figure out if this is a bug or just a misunderstanding.
I’m attempting to install Gnome on the generic cloud init image of Debian 12
using the package task-gnome-desktop and it’s failing because on the cloud
images the netdev group is created with a GID > 999. This causes
My dear Illustrious leaders and senior List Maintainers of Debian Users ML,
I want to have other users run my python script on their computers,
that don't have python installer, as a standalone binary/executable.
I searched the debian-user ML with the string, "standalone python
binary executable"
18 matches
Mail list logo
