tomas@... composed on 2023-02-10 06:47 (UTC+0100):
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 16:22:52 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> > has worked very well since redhat 5.0 in 1998. The only thing I do is
>> > a chattr +i on resolv.conf so network mangler can't putz with it. And
>> That kind of quick&dirty ha
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:16:49PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> gene heskett wrote:
> >
> > Chuckle... I might, but there also several switches in this lashup, the main
> > one claims to be managed but the other 2 are just glorified hubs. There's
> > even another router out in the shed but its runn
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:46:51PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/9/23 04:13, Anssi Saari wrote:
[...]
> > I don't know why though. The other IPv6 access I have is through a VPN
> > and there, for privacy, of course my connection is NATted to the same
> > exit IPv6 address as everyone else's.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 04:22:52PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > has worked very well since redhat 5.0 in 1998. The only thing I do is
> > a chattr +i on resolv.conf so network mangler can't putz with it. And
>
> That kind of quick&dirty hack is fairly dangerous in the long run: as
> they accu
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 05:17:42PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/9/23 15:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
> Maybe I am the last on the planet still using hosts files [...]
Nonsense. I do use /etc/hosts profusely. If you have the right
incantation in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as Greg has said a coupl
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:32:46PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/9/23 07:53, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 07:32:18AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > (I have no idea what mdns4_minimal is, but Debian put it there, and it
> > > hasn't caused a problem
On 2023-02-09 22:09, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2023-02-09 at 21:39, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm trying to use a Linksys AE1200 wifi usb dongle as a second network
connection for my Bookworm workstation. The device shows up in lsusb but
not in ip link.
According to what I've found, it needs the brcmfmac
On 2023-02-09 22:07, piorunz wrote:
On 10/02/2023 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
Interestingly the device works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
the computer that used to use it. That really only required
downloading the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac
module. That package
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:55 PM Default User
wrote:
> Hello to all!
>
> I just got a brand new Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 laptop. Came
> with Windows (ugh!) preinstalled.
> My old Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3542 laptop (made in 2014) just died.
> So this one should work, right?
>
> No.
>
On 2023-02-09 at 21:39, Gary Dale wrote:
> I'm trying to use a Linksys AE1200 wifi usb dongle as a second network
> connection for my Bookworm workstation. The device shows up in lsusb but
> not in ip link.
>
> According to what I've found, it needs the brcmfmac driver module, which
> seems to
On 10/02/2023 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
Interestingly the device works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
the computer that used to use it. That really only required downloading
the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac module. That
package no longer exists in Bookworm.
All y
I'm trying to use a Linksys AE1200 wifi usb dongle as a second network
connection for my Bookworm workstation. The device shows up in lsusb but
not in ip link.
According to what I've found, it needs the brcmfmac driver module, which
seems to be in the 6.1 kernel and loaded:
$ lsmod | grep br
On 2023-02-08 10:55, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2023-02-08 09:07, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2023-02-08 00:55, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 08.02.2023 09:07, Gary Dale wrote:
I thought this would be easier than it's turned out to be. There
are Internet posts going back years about support for this dev
On 2023-02-09 03:30, Anssi Saari wrote:
Gary Dale writes:
I thought this would be easier than it's turned out to be. There are Internet
posts going back years about support for this device but nothing recent -
including a 5 year old Ubuntu post saying it works. Other wifi devices seem to
be
Hello to all!
I just got a brand new Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 laptop. Came with
Windows (ugh!) preinstalled.
My old Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3542 laptop (made in 2014) just died.
So this one should work, right?
No.
Unfortunately the new 3511 is quite different from the old 3542. I
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 05:17:42PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Maybe I am the last on the planet still using hosts files, but I doubt that
You are not. Some of my systems at work use them. Technically, they
*all* do if you count the mandatory entries for the NIS servers.
> I also think it woul
On 2/9/23 17:41, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 10/2/23 05:32, Michel Verdier wrote:
Le 9 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
And where is that info published? Up till now I was not aware of an
ipv6 equ
to 192.168.xx.xx addresses. That could make the cheese quite a bit less
binding. :o)>
You coul
On 2/9/23 16:33, Michel Verdier wrote:
Le 9 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
And where is that info published? Up till now I was not aware of an ipv6 equ
to 192.168.xx.xx addresses. That could make the cheese quite a bit less
binding. :o)>
You could find a nice list here:
https://www.apni
On 10/2/23 05:32, Michel Verdier wrote:
Le 9 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
And where is that info published? Up till now I was not aware of an ipv6 equ
to 192.168.xx.xx addresses. That could make the cheese quite a bit less
binding. :o)>
You could find a nice list here:
https://www.ap
On 2/9/23 15:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:47:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
you refuse to answer the question asked. from that machine to any other
machine on my net "ssh -Y othermachines' alias as shown in the hosts file..
response was not found. Ditto for a ping unless
Le 9 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
> And where is that info published? Up till now I was not aware of an ipv6 equ
> to 192.168.xx.xx addresses. That could make the cheese quite a bit less
> binding. :o)>
You could find a nice list here:
https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/faqs/what-is-an-ip-addre
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 04:22:52PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > has worked very well since redhat 5.0 in 1998. The only thing I do is
> > a chattr +i on resolv.conf so network mangler can't putz with it. And
>
> That kind of quick&dirty hack is fairly dangerous in the long run: as
> they accu
> has worked very well since redhat 5.0 in 1998. The only thing I do is
> a chattr +i on resolv.conf so network mangler can't putz with it. And
That kind of quick&dirty hack is fairly dangerous in the long run: as
they accumulate, they increase the risk that one of them will lead to
a completely
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:47:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> you refuse to answer the question asked. from that machine to any other
> machine on my net "ssh -Y othermachines' alias as shown in the hosts file..
> response was not found. Ditto for a ping unless I gave ping the actual ipv4
> addr
On 2/9/23 15:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:02:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Just last week I added another bpi5, copied the /etc/hosts file and
restarted networking. It could NOT find the other machines on my net UNTIL I
added that search directive to resolv.conf. This n
gene heskett wrote:
>
> Chuckle... I might, but there also several switches in this lashup, the main
> one claims to be managed but the other 2 are just glorified hubs. There's
> even another router out in the shed but its running as a hub, radio turned
> off just as are all the others here. They
On 2/9/23 07:53, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 07:32:18AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
(I have no idea what mdns4_minimal is, but Debian put it there, and it
hasn't caused a problem yet so I left it alone.)
This is a zeroconf thingy. My box hasn't that, because I banne
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:02:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Just last week I added another bpi5, copied the /etc/hosts file and
> restarted networking. It could NOT find the other machines on my net UNTIL I
> added that search directive to resolv.conf. This net is about 50/50 buster
> and bull
On 2/9/23 07:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:54:01AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Where you run a dns of sorts, I don't, resolv.conf says check host first,
then query the router which forwards it to the nameserver at my isp.
Gene, we've been over this MANY times in the last s
On 2/9/23 04:13, Anssi Saari wrote:
jeremy ardley writes:
In the case of adding IPv6 without NAT, then without a firewall, external
baddies can connect unsolicited to your internal devices. Some of your devices
will
have their own personal firewalls already, e.g. any windows machine. Some
w
On 2/9/23 03:33, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:00:24AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
This would suggest that the record for yahoo is available, but the
v6 connectivity is not.
Show us the result of 'ip addr list' on your box...
Cheers
ip addr list.{Munged}
1: lo:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 23:32, Tixy wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 11:38 +0100, Dariusz wrote:
> > Hi, is there any chance for WiFi firmware-atheros for Bookworm in the
> > estimated time?
> If you mean firmware-atheros appears to be missing, it could be that
> it's moved from the 'non-free' secti
On 09/02/2023 01:23, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 22:07:37 +0700
Max Nikulin wrote:
Does it work if you pass a USB device to a Linux
guest (e.g. boot some live image)?
Yes. I can hand a USB memory stick to a Debian guest, Debian installer,
bullseye and bookworm. Host is bullseye.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 08:11:15AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:52:42PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Just out of curiosity: does your box have one of those funny link-local
> > IPv4 169.254.xxx.yyy addresses?
>
> Nope.
[...]
> inet6 fe80::1a60:24ff:f
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:52:42PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 07:32:18AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > (I have no idea what mdns4_minimal is, but Debian put it there, and it
> > hasn't caused a problem yet so I left it alone.)
>
> This is a zeroconf th
"Alexander V. Makartsev" writes:
> Good to hear you've made it working.
> You might want to walk an extra mile and setup DKMS [1][2] for it, so it will
> automatically re-compile and re-install itself after every kernel image
> update.
>
>
> [1] https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/dkms/dkms.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 07:32:18AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
> (I have no idea what mdns4_minimal is, but Debian put it there, and it
> hasn't caused a problem yet so I left it alone.)
This is a zeroconf thingy. My box hasn't that, because I banned Avahi
and its ilk long ago.
Just out o
jeremy ardley writes:
> On 9/2/23 17:13, Anssi Saari wrote:
>> If forwarding is not enabled, then the LAN IPv6 hosts are just as
>> isolated from incoming traffic from the internet as hosts behind NAT.
>>
> If you don't have IPv6 forwarding on the router then none of your
> internal hosts will be
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 11:38 +0100, Dariusz wrote:
> Hi, is there any chance for WiFi firmware-atheros for Bookworm in the
> estimated time?
If you mean firmware-atheros appears to be missing, it could be that
it's moved from the 'non-free' section of the archive, to the new
section 'non-free-firm
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:54:01AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Where you run a dns of sorts, I don't, resolv.conf says check host first,
> then query the router which forwards it to the nameserver at my isp.
Gene, we've been over this MANY times in the last several years. I'll
repeat it once mor
Hi, is there any chance for WiFi firmware-atheros for Bookworm in the
estimated time?
regards
--
Pozdrawiam
Dariusz Kaminski
tel. +48 22 783 3956
On 08.02.2023 20:55, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2023-02-08 09:07, Gary Dale wrote:
The journalctl command returns nothing.
That's strange. Is it possible you've forgot that pound ("#") sign means
"run as root"?
Found a github repository that compiles on Bullseye at
https://github.com/morrownr/88x
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:13:04AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:
> jeremy ardley writes:
[...]
> > The other option of NAT for your IPv6 is frowned on
>
> I don't know why though. The other IPv6 access I have is through a VPN
> and there, for privacy, of course my connection is NATted to the same
>
On 9/2/23 17:13, Anssi Saari wrote:
If forwarding is not enabled, then the LAN IPv6 hosts are just as
isolated from incoming traffic from the internet as hosts behind NAT.
If you don't have IPv6 forwarding on the router then none of your
internal hosts will be able to communicate on IPv6 beyo
jeremy ardley writes:
> In the case of adding IPv6 without NAT, then without a firewall, external
> baddies can connect unsolicited to your internal devices. Some of your
> devices will
> have their own personal firewalls already, e.g. any windows machine. Some
> won't, e.g. a printer. In the
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:00:24AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > This would suggest that the record for yahoo is available, but the
> > v6 connectivity is not.
> >
> > Show us the result of 'ip addr list' on your box...
> >
> > Cheers
> ip addr list.{Munged}
>
> 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc
Gary Dale writes:
> I thought this would be easier than it's turned out to be. There are Internet
> posts going back years about support for this device but nothing recent -
> including a 5 year old Ubuntu post saying it works. Other wifi devices seem
> to be recognized out of the box or with a
On 2/9/23 00:42, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:54:54PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
This machine is on bullseye, and when I installed, I noted that networking
worked over ipv4 but have noted jst now that responses to the ipv6 versions
of both ping6 and traceroute6 have changed
48 matches
Mail list logo
