gene heskett wrote:
> On 11/16/22 14:09, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:03:20PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > > I have removed the execute perms from that utility and restarted the
> > > > job.
> > >
> > > Why not simply *remove* the unattended-upg
On 11/16/22 14:17, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:03:20 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
Please relay to the devs that this utility is dangerous, and needs the
ability to scan the system for stuff that cannot be interrupted, and
exit quietly if it finds one of the un-interruptables runn
On 11/16/22 14:09, Dan Ritter wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:03:20PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
I have removed the execute perms from that utility and restarted the job.
Why not simply *remove* the unattended-upgrades package? It sounds like
your system is one that sh
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:03:20 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
> Please relay to the devs that this utility is dangerous, and needs the
> ability to scan the system for stuff that cannot be interrupted, and
> exit quietly if it finds one of the un-interruptables running.
Did you have Unattended-Upgrade
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:03:20PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > I have removed the execute perms from that utility and restarted the job.
>
> Why not simply *remove* the unattended-upgrades package? It sounds like
> your system is one that should not be using it.
I bet
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:03:20PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Please relay to the devs that this utility is dangerous, and needs the
> ability to scan the system for stuff that cannot be interrupted, and exit
> quietly if it finds one of the un-interruptables running.
>
Gene
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:03:20PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> I have removed the execute perms from that utility and restarted the job.
Why not simply *remove* the unattended-upgrades package? It sounds like
your system is one that should not be using it.
Yep, confirming I see it again -- thanks, folks!
On 11/16/22 13:25, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/16/22 11:57, Luna Jernberg wrote:
It's not just you! fasttrack.debian.net is down.
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/fasttrack.debian.net?proto=https
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:56 PM Boyan Penkov
On 11/16/22 11:57, Luna Jernberg wrote:
It's not just you! fasttrack.debian.net is down.
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/fasttrack.debian.net?proto=https
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:56 PM Boyan Penkov wrote:
Hello folks,
Is https://fasttrack.debian.net/ down?
Its ok here and now...
Che
Greetings all;
Please relay to the devs that this utility is dangerous, and needs the
ability to scan the system for stuff that cannot be interrupted, and
exit quietly if it finds one of the un-interruptables running.
The instant example is an arm system, and it was running octoprint on a
job
On 16/11/2022 13:55, Thomas George wrote:
I am giving up and will proceed with the netinst. Thanks everyone for
the many helpful comments and recommendations.
I stripped the spaces from the fingerprint and equated it RSA key. They
matched. So every thing is correct until the last step
Dragon
Good to let users of gpg know credentials have no web of trust so
verification of credentials will remain limited until further public and
official notice. Public and official notice ought to include an
announcement email to all debian email lists in the event these
credentials are ever added to a
-- Forwarded message -
From: Boyan Penkov
Date: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: FastTrack?
To: Luna Jernberg
Lol -- yep...
Thanks, I'l wait a bit here...
Cheers!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:57 AM Luna Jernberg wrote:
>
> It's not just you! fasttrack.debian.net is do
It's not just you! fasttrack.debian.net is down.
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/fasttrack.debian.net?proto=https
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:56 PM Boyan Penkov wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Is https://fasttrack.debian.net/ down?
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Boyan Penkov
>
I am giving up and will proceed with the netinst. Thanks everyone for
the many helpful comments and recommendations.
I stripped the spaces from the fingerprint and equated it RSA key. They
matched. So every thing is correct until the last step
Dragonette:/home/tom/Downloads/debian# gpg2 --ver
Hello folks,
Is https://fasttrack.debian.net/ down?
Cheers!
--
Boyan Penkov
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:12:26AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:09:16AM -0800, Joe B wrote:
> > Hello, This is an old thread about 2003ish i found it browsing the lists, i
> > noticed that your post dosen't have the >> next to the quote you have pipes
> > |
> > on all o
On 2022-11-16, David Christensen wrote:
>
> Of course, a reverse operation is desirable -- e.g. "restore".
Very, very desirable.
Hi,
i managed to produce a rare self-misattribution by copy+paste:
-
the program gpg writes about the Debian CD signing key DA87E80D6294BE9B :
> > > WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > > There is
Hi,
the program gpg writes about the Debian CD signing key DA87E80D6294BE9B :
> > > WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > > There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner
I wrote:
> > This is a security usability problem. How is a non-expert to know that
Hi Thomas,
Here's some feedback while looking at things from 10,000 feet. There
are several problems with processes and documentation.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 3:14 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Thomas George wrote:
> > I am going to erase every thing I have done and start over.
>
> There's no ne
On 2022-11-15, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this module causes delays when booting and I'm finding this in dmesg:
>
>
> [ 14.889003] mei_me :00:16.0: hw_reset failed ret = -62
Aren't you 'hw' yourself? Or is that a mere coincidence I would've done
well to ignore? (Or is the machine trying to tell
On 11/16/22 09:13, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Thomas George wrote:
I am going to erase every thing I have done and start over.
There's no need for starting over. The SHA512SUM file is meanwhile
authenticated by your run of:
gpg2 --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS
[...]
gpg: Good signa
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:09:16AM -0800, Joe B wrote:
> Hello, This is an old thread about 2003ish i found it browsing the lists, i
> noticed that your post dosen't have the >> next to the quote you have pipes |
> on all of the quotes. how did you do that?
It would be an option in one's MUA (Mail
Joe B wrote:
> Hello, This is an old thread about 2003ish i found it browsing the lists, i
> noticed that your post dosen't have the >> next to the quote you have pipes |
> on all of the quotes. how did you do that?
>
> I'm trying to find a solution to the >> > that other people can view normal
Hello, This is an old thread about 2003ish i found it browsing the lists, i
noticed that your post dosen't have the >> next to the quote you have pipes |
on all of the quotes. how did you do that?
I'm trying to find a solution to the >> > that other people can view normally
when looking through
Hi,
Thomas George wrote:
> I am going to erase every thing I have done and start over.
There's no need for starting over. The SHA512SUM file is meanwhile
authenticated by your run of:
> > gpg2 --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS
> > [...]
> > gpg: Good signature from "Debian CD signing key
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
