Re: LibreOffice - any way to recover not saved changes to the file?

2022-09-23 Thread piorunz
On 24/09/2022 01:38, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote: did you realize that, if the backup copy fails for any reason, also the document cannot be saved and thus *all* work is lost? I experienced this behaviour recently to my dismay (not to say anger). I never used Backup copy feature, I just enabled

Re: question re tar

2022-09-23 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 19:18:35 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > I think the question was about a way/place/method to manually add such > headers from within Gmail, so that they can be present even when > replying to a message from within the digest, so that replies can be > made correctly while subscrib

Re: LibreOffice - any way to recover not saved changes to the file?

2022-09-23 Thread Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ
On Freitag, 23. September 2022 09:28:12 -04 piorunz wrote: > On 13/09/2022 20:47, Juan R.D. Silva wrote: > > I was pissed off to find out that autosave is desabled by default. I > > used not to care. Looks like now I want to enable it. 😄 > > Same! I just realized that AutoRecovery is disabled by d

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Alex King
On 24/09/22 03:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:22:31AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: 'man bash' cites Brian Fox and Chet Ramey as the authors, and gives an E-mail address for each. (It's possible that they may be the active upstream maintainers, as well.) Chet Ramey is the

Re: question re tar

2022-09-23 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-09-23 at 16:24, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > jr wrote: > >> I [...] cannot find an obvious (any!) place where headers could be set [...] >> I [...] hope that someone can/will supply Gmail specific instructions > > The normal way to participate is to subscribe your mail address at >

Re: question re tar

2022-09-23 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, jr wrote: > I [...] cannot find an obvious (any!) place where headers could be set [...] > I [...] hope that someone can/will supply Gmail specific instructions The normal way to participate is to subscribe your mail address at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ or by sending a mail to

mail headers not set (cf question re tar)

2022-09-23 Thread jr
hi, a single reply re the mail headers issue. On Thursday, 22 September 2022 at 09:20:06 UTC+1, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > ... > Your mails lack headers like "In-Reply-To:" or "References:", ... On Thursday, 22 September 2022 at 09:30:05 UTC+1, Tixy wrote: > ... > For a lot (most?) of us, your mes

Re: Dash man page not correct?

2022-09-23 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-09-23 at 13:20, Perry Smith wrote: > I have Debian bullseye installed in a container. My reading of the man > page[1] > is to use the -i flag to get dash to read $HOME/.profile. But that doesn’t > seem > to work for me. Instead, -l needs to be used. At least, that seems to be > tru

Dash man page not correct?

2022-09-23 Thread Perry Smith
I have Debian bullseye installed in a container. My reading of the man page[1] is to use the -i flag to get dash to read $HOME/.profile. But that doesn’t seem to work for me. Instead, -l needs to be used. At least, that seems to be true for me using Docker. Does this seem to be correct? If

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-09-23 at 12:02, Emanuel Berg wrote: > The Wanderer wrote: > >> That's maintainership history, with E-mail addresses attached. > > There should be no history entries in the man pages that relates to > practical aspects that are no longer operational. The E-mail address doesn't relate to

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Emanuel Berg
Greg Wooledge wrote: >> 'man bash' cites Brian Fox and Chet Ramey as the authors, >> and gives an E-mail address for each. (It's possible that >> they may be the active upstream maintainers, as well.) > > Chet Ramey is the current upstream bash maintainer. > Brian Fox has not been involved with ba

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Emanuel Berg
The Wanderer wrote: > That's maintainership history, with E-mail > addresses attached. There should be no history entries in the man pages that relates to practical aspects that are no longer operational. Commands, examples that once worked but are now removed, options that are obsolete/deprecat

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-09-23 at 11:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:22:31AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > >> 'man bash' cites Brian Fox and Chet Ramey as the authors, and gives >> an E-mail address for each. (It's possible that they may be the >> active upstream maintainers, as well.) > > C

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:22:31AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > 'man bash' cites Brian Fox and Chet Ramey as the authors, and gives an > E-mail address for each. (It's possible that they may be the active > upstream maintainers, as well.) Chet Ramey is the current upstream bash maintainer. Brian

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-09-23 at 11:07, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/exif/exif.1.en.html >> >>AUTHOR >>exif was written by Lutz Mueller >> and numerous contributors. >>This man page is Copyright © 2002-2012 Thomas Pircher, >>Dan Fandrich

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Emanuel Berg
Greg Wooledge wrote: > https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/exif/exif.1.en.html > >AUTHOR >exif was written by Lutz Mueller > and numerous contributors. >This man page is Copyright © 2002-2012 Thomas Pircher, >Dan Fandrich and others. > > This isn't a contact address for bug re

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote: > The fix in this case would amount to removing that entry from > the roff source. Let's be clear. We're talking about the exif(1) man page, as shown here? https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/exif/exif.1.en.html AUTHOR exif w

Re: exif --remove not idempotent, and a Debian man page bug

2022-09-23 Thread Emanuel Berg
David Wright wrote: >> But: isn't it still a bug in the distribution man page to >> refer to mail address that bounces? > > I hope the maintainers (Debian's) have better things to do Are you saying incorrect information in the man pages are OK in Debian? > than trawl through email addresses in m

Re: LibreOffice - any way to recover not saved changes to the file?

2022-09-23 Thread piorunz
On 13/09/2022 20:47, Juan R.D. Silva wrote: I was pissed off to find out that autosave is desabled by default. I used not to care. Looks like now I want to enable it. 😄 Same! I just realized that AutoRecovery is disabled by default, and backup copy feature is also disabled by default. Now I ena

Re: LibreOffice - any way to recover not saved changes to the file?

2022-09-23 Thread Chris Mitchell
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:37:14 +0200 (CEST) local10 wrote: > I actually have it disabled on purpose. The reason is I don't always > want changes to be autosaved because sometimes the changes make the > document worse. I wonder if there's some change tracking option in LO > that would allow to see h

Re: Re: Re: apt-get dist-upgrade keeping back some packets

2022-09-23 Thread Gionatan Danti
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:51:15 +0200 Gionatan Danti wrote: Using libsystemd0 as an example, apt-cache policy shown the installed packages with score 100, and an available update with score 500. Still, the update was not installed until I manually specified the package on the apt-get dist-upgrade