On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:10:52PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:05:46PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:48 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > > > Yes, no problems accessi
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 06:47:46PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome. Both
> > 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome version.
>
> Wait, wait, wait, wait.
>
> I am *so* con
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:09:51AM +0200, Ángel wrote:
> On 2022-08-27 at 20:32 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > > Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and
> > > chrome. Both 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome ve
On Tue 23 Aug 2022 at 20:36:39 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Tue 23 Aug 2022 at 10:19:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > FF's ability to print has improved a lot recently. Not perfect, mind.
>
> Perhaps you would expand on this? Previous drawbacks?
The main problem was overlong pages, which would
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:05:46PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:48 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > > Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome.
> > Both
> > > 10 and 11 hav
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:48 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome.
> Both
> > 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome version.
>
> Wait, wait, wait, wait.
>
> I am *so* confused rig
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome. Both
> 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome version.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
I am *so* confused right now. Is the Debian system the WEB SERVER, or
is it the WEB BROWS
On 2022-08-27 at 20:32 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> > Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and
> > chrome. Both 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome version. I'm not
> > seeing any version change notes for Chrome
Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome. Both 10
and 11 have the latest Chrome version. I'm not seeing any version change notes
for Chrome or Debian 11 that appear to affect this .asp behavior. Not to say I
haven't missed something.
TM
On 8/27/22 12:16, to...@tu
On 8/27/22 12:21, Stefan Monnier wrote:
What sort of hoops would I have to take a running swan dive thru to
have cura, on this machine, directly drive /sshnet/rock64/dev/ttyACM0,
my Prusa MK3S+ printer? I'm already logged into it over my local net
twice and it would sure save me a lot of sneakern
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:28:38PM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> Yes, no problems accessing the .asp pages with Debian 10 and chrome. Both
> 10 and 11 have the latest Chrome version. I'm not seeing any version change
> notes for Chrome or Debian 11 that appear to affect this .asp behavior. Not
>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 10:53:18AM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
> Understood.
>
> But it works with Debian 10 and not with Debian 11, so my main question is
> 'what changed?'
Does it /still/ work with Debian 10, though?
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Understood.
But it works with Debian 10 and not with Debian 11, so my main question is 'what
changed?'
TM
On 8/26/22 12:53, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:37:41AM -0600, tony mollica wrote:
Good morning (Mountain time).
Here's the problem I'm having. Debian is so stabl
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 at 01:30, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:46:17AM +1000, David wrote:
> > I think there might be one remaining aspect still mysterious, so there
> > might be yet another factor beyond the FIVE you identified ...
> >
> > The fact that this statement, first sho
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:46:17AM +1000, David wrote:
> I think there might be one remaining aspect still mysterious, so there
> might be yet another factor beyond the FIVE you identified ...
>
> The fact that this statement, first shown by Tim, does NOT error:
>
> $ ( bash -uc : ; : )
(insid
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 at 00:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 09:52:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I also can't explain this (still inside the ssh localhost session):
> >
> > unicorn:~$ (bash -c 'declare -p PS1')
> > declare -- PS1="\\h:\\w\\\$ "
> > unicorn:~$ (bash -cu 'dec
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 09:52:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> I also can't explain this (still inside the ssh localhost session):
>
>
> unicorn:~$ (bash -c 'declare -p PS1')
> declare -- PS1="\\h:\\w\\\$ "
> unicorn:~$ (bash -cu 'declare -p PS1')
> /etc/bash.bashrc: line 7: PS1: unbound variab
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 09:07:49PM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> Further to my longer reply on this list, there are three separate network
> configuration & management services that can be running at the same time on
> a debian system
>
> * networking.service
> * systemd-networkd.service
> * Ne
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 05:12:57PM +1000, David wrote:
> I have modified my ssh environment so that it is not the default.
> But I do see a similar error message, using ssh from stable Debian 11.
>
> [david@kablamm ~]$ ( bash -cu : )
> [david@kablamm ~]$ ssh kablamm
> Linux kablamm 5.10.0-16-amd64
Greetings all;
My local home network is all behind a router running dd-wrt. sitting in
this chair,
3 rooms away from a rock64 running armbian, I can see the rock64's
/dev/ttyACM0, owned
by root:dialout. I am a member of that group and logged into it from
here. My home net
is 100% host file b
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:11:47AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 27 Aug 2022 at 00:23:10 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On 8/26/22 20:35, David wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 10:27, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > I get these results as well, with Debian 11's packaged bash.
> > > Yeah, s
On 27/8/22 8:25 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 11:55:44AM -, Curt wrote:
On 2022-08-27, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
I'd appreciate any suggestions about how to diagnose or cure the
problem. I have set VERBOSE=yes in /etc/default/networking
First of all ensure NetworkManag
On 27/8/22 7:55 pm, Curt wrote:
On 2022-08-27, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
I'd appreciate any suggestions about how to diagnose or cure the
problem. I have set VERBOSE=yes in /etc/default/networking
First of all ensure NetworkManager is really dead.
Your advice and the advice of Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 11:55:44AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-08-27, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd appreciate any suggestions about how to diagnose or cure the
> >> problem. I have set VERBOSE=yes in /etc/default/networking
> >>
> > First of all ensure NetworkManager is really dead.
>
> Y
On 2022-08-27, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>>
>> I'd appreciate any suggestions about how to diagnose or cure the
>> problem. I have set VERBOSE=yes in /etc/default/networking
>>
> First of all ensure NetworkManager is really dead.
Your advice and the advice of Andrew M.A. Cater appear
to be antithetic
On Fri 26 Aug 2022 at 22:37:08 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 03:06:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > In Debian 11/bullseye my system keeps reporting timeouts while trying
> > to bring up the first non-loopback interface. According to ip, the
> > interface actually is
Hello,
> Il giorno 26 ago 2022, alle ore 19:31, piorunz ha scritto:
>
> On 26/08/2022 10:18, rudu wrote:
>
>> You should be right, but after booting on both 5.10 kernels I found in
>> my repositories :
>> ii linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64 5.10.106-1 amd64 Linux 5.10
>> for 64-bit PCs
Ross Boylan writes:
> In Debian 11/bullseye my system keeps reporting timeouts while trying
> to bring up the first non-loopback interface.
I wonder why it is that you have a script for wpa_supplicant if you
don't have wireless interfaces?
Assuming that's not the problem, I guess you'll need to
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 16:49, Tim Woodall wrote:
> This just gets weirder and weirder.
>
> It looks like it's related to logging in with ssh:
[..]
> apt-mirror@aptmirror17:~$ ( bash -cu : )
> apt-mirror@aptmirror17:~$
> apt-mirror@aptmirror17:~$ ssh aptmirror17
> Last login: Sat Aug 27 06:23:1
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:49:17AM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 11:22:09AM +1000, David wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 10:27, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > Has anyone managed to reproduce the OP's results, either
30 matches
Mail list logo
