On 7/30/22 11:00 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 05:55:23PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Can someone please help me diagnose why dynupdater is not seeming to update
my ip address so I cna access my local computer from somewhere else.
ps ax |grep dyn
5237 ? Sl 170:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 05:55:23PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Can someone please help me diagnose why dynupdater is not seeming to update
> my ip address so I cna access my local computer from somewhere else.
>
> ps ax |grep dyn
> 5237 ? Sl 170:43 dyn_updater
> 5269 ? Sl
Can someone please help me diagnose why dynupdater is not seeming to
update my ip address so I cna access my local computer from somewhere else.
ps ax |grep dyn
5237 ? Sl 170:43 dyn_updater
5269 ? Sl 5:38 /usr/bin/dyn_updater --daemon start
719685 pts/2 R+ 0:00
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > > Logging in as root has become taboo. Sudo is the prefered mechanism for
> > > running administrator functions. I have root set t
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 22:26 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> Rumour goes that the processor in the stick/card can cope better with
> FAT. I don't know whether it's true, though.
A long time ago I heard something along the lines that the first blocks
in the storage device (where the the FAT woul
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 09:37:37PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> pe...@easthope.ca writes:
>
> > David,
> > thanks for the reply.
> >
> > From: David Wright
> > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:29 -0500
> > > When you copy files that have varied permissions onto the FAT, you may
> > > get warnin
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:13:55 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * In Linux, an ext file system avoids those complications. To my
> knowledge, all SD cards are preformatted with a FAT. Therefore ext
> requires reformatting.
Not quite. The preparation of any storage medium requires at least two
s
pe...@easthope.ca writes:
David,
thanks for the reply.
From: David Wright
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:29 -0500
> When you copy files that have varied permissions onto the FAT, you may
> get warnings about permissions that can't be honoured. (IIRC, copying
> ug=r,o= would not complain,
On Sat 30 Jul 2022 at 20:21:00 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > > Logging in as root has become taboo. Sudo is the prefered mechanism for
> > > running adm
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > Logging in as root has become taboo. Sudo is the prefered mechanism for
> > running administrator functions. I have root set to nologin with a null
> > passwor
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> Logging in as root has become taboo. Sudo is the prefered mechanism for
> running administrator functions. I have root set to nologin with a null
> password to force sudo usage.
This makes entering single-user mode ("rescue m
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:08 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> > Open the Terminal
> > Become root by running su
> > Try to run ldconfig -> "Command not found"
> > Try to run /sbin/ldconfig -> execution successful
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/N
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 09:33:17AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From:
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 06:22:53 +0200
> > No. A FAT file system has no permissions (and no user/group ownership).
> > All is faked one layer above.
>
> Understood.
>
> Aren't we saying the same thing in two wa
David,
thanks for the reply.
From: David Wright
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:29 -0500
> When you copy files that have varied permissions onto the FAT, you may
> get warnings about permissions that can't be honoured. (IIRC, copying
> ug=r,o= would not complain, whereas u=r,go= would.)
Pr
From:
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 06:22:53 +0200
> No. A FAT file system has no permissions (and no user/group ownership).
> All is faked one layer above.
Understood.
Aren't we saying the same thing in two ways. In natural language, 777
just means anyone can read & write & execute. 555 mea
From:
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 06:22:53 +0200
> No. A FAT file system has no permissions (and no user/group ownership).
> All is faked one layer above.
Understood.
Aren't we saying the same thing in two ways. In natural language, 777
just means anyone can read & write & execute. 555 jus
Anssi Saari (12022-07-21):
> Well, upgrading that to current Debian could be one way forward. There
> are tools in Debian you can use to weed out the proprietary stuff if
> that's a concern. Upgrades in Debian work in case you're unaware but
> follow the release notes.
Or I could debootstrap a bra
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 23:10:33 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> This machine has got as far as apt-get upgrade with the recent point
> release, so I've yet to dist-upgrade for the new kernel and reboot.
> At the moment it shows:
>
> $ /sbin/needrestart
> Scanning processes...
> Your outdated processe
On 30/07/22 10:20, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 04:30:19PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
My thought is to configure rsyslog to create extra logfiles, equivalent to
syslog and auth.log (the two files that logcheck monitors by default), which
only log messages at priority 'warn
19 matches
Mail list logo
