On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:35:50 -0600
"c. marlow" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought
> that I would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried
> TDE before.
>
> And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
> Konq
Hans wrote:
> Reading these, and I am also very old school, with my first linux
> installation
> of SuSE 6.0 in 1986, I am asking myself: What is better, working fast or
> working with nice tools?
1986 seems to be a bit too early to me, since the first SUSE Linux (1.0)
was released 1994.
S.U.S.
deloptes composed on 2022-01-20 23:20 (UTC+0100):
> Hans wrote:
>> Reading these, and I am also very old school, with my first linux
>> installation of SuSE 6.0 in 1986, I am asking myself: What is better,
>> working fast or working with nice tools?
> according to this article https://en.wikiped
Hans wrote:
> Reading these, and I am also very old school, with my first linux
> installation of SuSE 6.0 in 1986, I am asking myself: What is better,
> working fast or working with nice tools?
according to this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUSE_Linux
SuSE Linux 6.0 was released on 199
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2022, 21:51:18 CET schrieb gene heskett:
Reading these, and I am also very old school, with my first linux installation
of SuSE 6.0 in 1986, I am asking myself: What is better, working fast or
working with nice tools?
I prefer those tools, which does the job best: Somet
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 3:35:57 PM EST Felix Miata wrote:
> gene heskett composed on 2022-01-20 14:49 (UTC-0500):
> > On Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:35:50 -0600 c. marlow wrote:
> >> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought
> >> that I would nuke and pave give TDE
gene heskett composed on 2022-01-20 14:49 (UTC-0500):
> On Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:35:50 -0600 c. marlow wrote:
>> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought
>> that I would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried TDE
>> before.
>> And I am wondering
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:35:50 AM EST c. marlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought
> that I would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried TDE
> before.
>
> And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
c. marlow wrote:
> And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
> Konqueror, which ain't worth a dang!
the erason many use TDE is
- it is very small in size
- it is very reliable (things just work)
even the bugs are well known and constantly fixed
So may be you are mor
On 2022-01-20, Siard wrote:
> Bob Bernstein wrote:
>> Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
>> packages.
>>
>> My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
>> Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost one hundred per
>> cent text -- and then use O
On 1/20/22, Dan Ritter wrote:
> c. marlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought that I
>>
>> would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried TDE before.
>>
>> And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
>> Konqu
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
> packages.
>
> My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
> Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost one hundred per
> cent text -- and then use OCR to produce pages from which I can
c. marlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought that I
> would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried TDE before.
>
> And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
> Konqueror, which ain't worth a dang!
I w
Tried to send this message a month ago but couldn't it accepted by the
list server due to the way it authenticates. Trying it again now that
I've switched hosts to one that claims it accepts the list server's
null-message test.
I've also had to do the uninstall, reboot and reinstall one more t
Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
packages.
My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost one hundred per
cent text -- and then use OCR to produce pages from which I can
copy 'n paste snippets of text
Hi,
Yes, I know that in previous emails I was using LXDE, but I thought that I
would nuke and pave give TDE a try since I had never tried TDE before.
And I am wondering what other file managers work with TDE 14 besides
Konqueror, which ain't worth a dang!
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu 20 Jan 2022 at 09:50:01 (+), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 06:50:06PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > I hate to douse the party, but all 127.0.0.0/8 addresses are defined to be
> > loop back. So no network interface card or network stack on top of it
> > should wr
On Sun 02 Jan 2022 at 20:49:12 (-0600), David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 18 Dec 2021 at 11:08:37 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Today I rebooted my machine for the first time in quite a while, after
> > the kernel update that was released along with Debian 11.2.
>
> Mine's a new installation. I've
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:54:22AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought
> > in a new version of google-chrome-stable
> >
> > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from
> > Google
Hi. When I shutdown or halt my laptop, I see error messages like:
[FAILED] Failed unmounting /root.
[⋮]
[FAILED] Failed unmounting /var/cache.
[⋮]
[ OK ] Reached target Unmount All Filesystems.
[ OK ] Reached target Final Step.
Starting halt...
My Nextclo
The Wanderer writes:
> On 2022-01-19 at 19:08, Richmond wrote:
>
>> I see debian 10's chromium is currently on version 90.0.4430.212
>> (Developer Build), whereas google-chrome is on Version 97.0.4692.99
>> (Official Build) (64-bit). Does that mean it is out of date and has
>> security vulnera
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 06:50:06PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
I hate to douse the party, but all 127.0.0.0/8 addresses are defined to be
loop back. So no network interface card or network stack on top of it
should write anything to the wire or air to that address.
…that's entirely consiste
22 matches
Mail list logo
