Thomas George wrote:
> Thanks, this fixed my problem and as Greg recommended I have reset mkdir
> ownership and options
If I were you, I would be very careful using root
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 5:18 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
> (Is there a reason why the line after the quote and before your new
> text, in both cases where that happened, consisted of a string of 11 tab
> characters instead of being empty? I had to delete the tabs manually in
> order to avoid having it
Thanks, this fixed my problem and as Greg recommended I have reset mkdir
ownership and options
On 11/5/21 7:35 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 6/11/21 7:17 am, Thomas George wrote:
when installing debian I entered eight digits as the root password.
The instillation completed successfully. Later I
So I'm trying to use a fedora Podman image on my Debian 11 machine but
for some reason DNS lookups do not seem to be working in the container
environment. Specifically:
$ podman run --rm -it fedora:latest
# dnf install gzip
[...]
Fedora 35 - x86_640.0 B
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:35:22AM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 6/11/21 7:17 am, Thomas George wrote:
> > I have found mkdir in /usr/bin and changed the ownership to root:tom and
> > given it rwx permissions but this does not solve the problem.
> Try
>
> sudo passwd root
>
> And reset the ro
Brian writes:
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 17:02:01 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:04:17PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 13:43:29 +, Tixy wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM
On 6/11/21 7:17 am, Thomas George wrote:
when installing debian I entered eight digits as the root password.
The instillation completed successfully. Later I tried to become root
but the eight digits didn't work and many permutations also didn't work.
I have used sudo successfully with many c
when installing debian I entered eight digits as the root password. The
instillation completed successfully. Later I tried to become root but
the eight digits didn't work and many permutations also didn't work.
I have used sudo successfully with many commands including mkdir but
sudo tar fails
(Is there a reason why the line after the quote and before your new
text, in both cases where that happened, consisted of a string of 11 tab
characters instead of being empty? I had to delete the tabs manually in
order to avoid having it mess up quoting in this reply.)
On 2021-11-05 at 19:03, Feli
The Wanderer composed on 2021-11-05 18:25 (UTC-0400):
> There's a specific kernel-command-line parameter (on top of 'nomodeset')
> for disabling KMS with certain types of Intel integrated GPU; I don't
> remember it off the top of my head, but I believe it involves the string
> 'i915'.
On 2021-11-05 at 18:14, Mark Copper wrote:
> Where to start diagnosing a problem like this?
At first blush: look into ways to disable kernel modesetting.
The details tend to vary depending on the GPU involved, but one thing
they usually have in common is adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel command
Where to start diagnosing a problem like this?
Minimal install -- no desktop.
No "oops" in syslog though there are some warnings.
System seems to shut down properly when power button pressed.
Yesterday I could even ssh in, but that facility disappeared.
Asrock H570M-ITX/ac with Intel i3-10100.
On 10/19/21 16:21, Grzesiek wrote:
On 10/18/21 5:35 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:55:45 +0200
Grzesiek wrote:
Hi there,
On some of machines I use, after opening of Firefox I get empty browser
window (with menus, decorations etc) but nothing else is displayed. Its
impossible to op
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 17:02:01 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:04:17PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 13:43:29 +, Tixy wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM Greg Wooledge w
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 07:43:22 (-0700), Peter Ehlert wrote:
> On 11/5/21 4:50 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> >
> > I did some test by installing 2 identical virtualbox instances
> > (EFI turned on) with the same netinst image
> > .
> >
> > I typically use XFCE, so I wanted to test if
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Can it be that obexd is allergic to symbolic links ?
>
>
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/cannot-receive-file-over-bluetooth/1813/3
> points to
>
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/bluez.git/tree/obexd/plugins/filesystem.c#n95
> which spews -EPERM if not obex_o
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 16:44:04 +, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 16:28:36 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
> > wrote:
> > > hv3
> >
> > This is a web browser written in TCL/tK. What I suspect is happening is
>
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> In the absence of a useful error message, you could either source-dive
> into obexd and try to figure out what it's actually doing... or you could
> *guess* (as I am currently guessing) that it's complaining about
> too-loose permissions, and then look at all the permissions
Hi,
deloptes wrote:
> lstat("/home", {st_mode=S_IFLNK|0777, st_size=10, ...}) = 0
> readlink("/home", "home-lisa/", 4095) = 10
Can it be that obexd is allergic to symbolic links ?
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/cannot-receive-file-over-bluetooth/1813/3
points to
https://git.kerne
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> WHAT application? And how is THAT creature spawned?
Sorry for confusion. For testing I run it on the command line, but it is
meant to be spawned from one BT manager application. It is spawned as
process the same way I start it in the command line.
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:24:38PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> I now used strace
> writev(2, [{iov_base="obexd[23074]: PUT(0x2), {iov_base="\n", iov_len=1}], 2) = 40
> sendto(3, "<31>Nov 5 18:04:33 obexd[23074]"..., 59, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0)
> = 59
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/home/user/Downloads/20211105_
David Wright wrote:
> Because both tests are run by hand, that does make it easier to strace
> what's going on in more detail than the debug output. For example, the
> open's flags are listed.
I forgot to mention that home is actually a link to home-lisa which is the
mount point for the NFS share
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:00:43PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > So, never mind. Continue whatever other investigations you have lined
> > up.
>
> Ah yes, obexd is meant to be run at user level. In my case it is started by
> a master application, but anyway thank you for th
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:04:17PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 13:43:29 +, Tixy wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Is "Debian desktop environment" identical to "GNOME
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> So, never mind. Continue whatever other investigations you have lined
> up.
Ah yes, obexd is meant to be run at user level. In my case it is started by
a master application, but anyway thank you for the effort.
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 16:28:36 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> > hv3
>
> This is a web browser written in TCL/tK. What I suspect is happening is
> it's being pulled in to satisfy a dependency on "www-browser" virtua
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
hv3
This is a web browser written in TCL/tK. What I suspect is happening is
it's being pulled in to satisfy a dependency on "www-browser" virtual
package by one of the desktop metapackages.
libsqlite3-tcl
libtcl8.6
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 11:55:19 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 02:46:18PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > > Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > Check whether the systemd unit file is restricting network access for
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 13:43:29 +, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > > Is "Debian desktop environment" identical to "GNOME" upon installation?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Right now, for
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 02:46:18PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > Check whether the systemd unit file is restricting network access for
> > > the service/process.
> >
> > ??? How do I do this - a hint woul
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 02:46:18PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > Check whether the systemd unit file is restricting network access for
> > the service/process.
>
> ??? How do I do this - a hint would be helpful.
Start by figuring out the name of the service.
Then try "syst
On 11/5/21 4:50 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
Hi,
I did some test by installing 2 identical virtualbox instances (EFI
turned on) with the same netinst image .
I typically use XFCE, so I wanted to test if leaving "Debian desktop
environment" marked would affect or not my XFCE ins
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Check whether the systemd unit file is restricting network access for
> the service/process.
??? How do I do this - a hint would be helpful.
thanks in advance
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 07:47 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > > Is "Debian desktop environment" identical to "GNOME" upon installation?
> >
> >
> >
> > Right now, for the regular official installers (and also for the
> > unofficial in
On Fri 05 Nov 2021 at 12:50:23 +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did some test by installing 2 identical virtualbox instances (EFI turned
> on) with the same netinst image .
>
> I typically use XFCE, so I wanted to test if leaving "Debian desktop
> environment" marked would
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 7:21 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Is "Debian desktop environment" identical to "GNOME" upon installation?
>
>
>
> Right now, for the regular official installers (and also for the
> unofficial installer with non-free firmware), that default task happens
> to be GNOME.
>
>
> Is "Debian desktop environment" identical to "GNOME" upon installation?
Assuming you install with one of the REGULAR installers (not one that
contains the word "Live" anywhere in its name): yes.
Selecting "Debian desktop environment" in the installer simply acts
as an alias for whichever deskto
Hi,
I added a few CCs, and added below a quote that I should have added to
the original mail.
On 11/5/21 12:50, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
Hi,
I did some test by installing 2 identical virtualbox instances (EFI
turned on) with the same netinst image .
I typically use XFCE, so I
Hi,
I did some test by installing 2 identical virtualbox instances (EFI
turned on) with the same netinst image .
I typically use XFCE, so I wanted to test if leaving "Debian desktop
environment" marked would affect or not my XFCE installation.
It does.
a)
| [ ] Debian desktop environment
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:32:27AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Burhan Hanoglu wrote:
>
> > Could be something about that NFS mount. To narrow down; point it to
> > /home/user/something that is not on NFS but on the local FS instead
> > and see what happens.
>
> Hi,
> yes it looks like it is somehow
(Sorry, this should have gone to the list in the first place.)
Please search the log for module nvidia.
grep -i -C 3 nvidia /var/log/Xorg.0.log
If you have installed package nvidia-driver in stable or testing, I
can't imagine that it is too old for any software. Nouveau should be
blacklisted by i
Hi all,
I was told to "update the DirectX/OpenGL driver" when I tried to use some
software.
One example is
Renderer: Error creating Canvas3D graphics context
I have general problems with the graphic rendering.
$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeF
Luis Mochan wrote:
> After a recent update/upgrade in debian/bookworm my bluetooth
> earphones and my bluetooth earphones stopped working.
> I found a solution in the discussion of at
>
>
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997862&archived=no&mbox=no&mboxmaint=no
>
> related to bug
Burhan Hanoglu wrote:
> Could be something about that NFS mount. To narrow down; point it to
> /home/user/something that is not on NFS but on the local FS instead
> and see what happens.
Hi,
yes it looks like it is somehow related, because on a local FS even with
same directory permissions (700)
45 matches
Mail list logo
