Adding this up here as a quick read: If this was installation via
debs, I'm out of the conversation. If it was about untarring [zipped
files] and you can repeatedly reproduce the issue now that you have
seen this, PLEASE don't share the package name(s) publicly. They could
be... dissected and then
On 7/21/21, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 12:04 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>> On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>>
>> frank@fedora ~$ stat /
>>File: /
>>Size: 4096Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
>> Device: 806h/2054d Inode: 2 Li
Thank Georgi!
the tricky part of my search for ideal adapter(needn't non-free firmware)
isthat many vendors claim they support linux, but i'm afraid they require
non-free firmware
is there some easy way to find out if it requires non-free firmware?
Thomas Schmitt [2021-07-21 20:11:15] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Plain old HDDs and SSDs also work for "immutable" backups: just don't
>> keep them connected to the host after you've done the backup.
> But how do you keep the system from messing them up during the first
> backup after the mal
On 2021-07-21 12:05, Reco wrote:
As always, any attempt on improving Debian is welcome, regardless of
the
outcome. It's not like Debian needs an improvement IMO, but
nevertheless.
Personally I liked it when it was files and documentation.
The internet distribution of things is obviously handy
Hi,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Of course, if the time between the moment the malware takes
> control and the moment when you notice it is longer than your rotation
> you might be in trouble, indeed (tho that depends on the details of how
> the malware operates w.r.t removable media).
With Write-Once
Thomas Schmitt [2021-07-21 19:00:48] wrote:
> James H. H. Lampert wrote:
>> "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how? Optical media?
> Yes. BD-R single layer are affordable and can take 25 GB each. With some
> compression you can put the whole operating system and the most important
> user
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 03:48:08PM -0500, Michael Morgan wrote:
> I need some help here. I worked in a university and have a linux (debian 9)
> machine with DHCP. For some reason I needed a static IP and two weeks ago
> the university sent someone who helped me set up the static IP. From what I
> s
Dear friends,
I need some help here. I worked in a university and have a linux (debian 9)
machine with DHCP. For some reason I needed a static IP and two weeks ago
the university sent someone who helped me set up the static IP. From what I
saw the file they modified is the "/etc/network/interfaces
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 12:27 PM Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:36:37AM -0700, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> > "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how?
>
> ...
> OS/400 was before my time, but I have a limited experience with z/VM
> which ran at z9 mainframe about 10 years ag
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:00:04 +0300
Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:38:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
...
> > Most, yes. But the pwn2own hackers, for example, seem to pretty
> > routinely get RCE on the major browsers, so I wouldn't bet my data that
> > ransomware authors won't as well:
> >
On 21/07/21 11:39 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote:
No, a bind mount doesn't take a device name as an argument. It takes
two directory names. From the man page:
mount --bind|--rbind|--move olddir newdir
It's used when you've already got the device mounted somewhere (the first
directory), and y
On 22/07/21 3:38 am, Reco wrote:
One sure way to beat ransomware is to
take immutable backups
That's fine if keeping access to your data is all you care about.
With the more modern ransomware that threatens to publish your (and/or
your customers') data, not so much.
Richard
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:38:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > > https://hacked.com/linux-ransomware-notorious-cases-and-ways-to-protect/
> > > >
> > > > Requires Java to be installed. A rare case on a Linux *desktop*.
> > >
> > > Rare? I don't have statistics, but on one of my Linux desktops,
On 7/18/2021 9:36 AM, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
On 7/18/21 10:07 AM, john doe wrote:
Debians,
I have a LAMP configured at home but now I would like to make this LAMP
publickly available to the world.
As it was suggested on this list, it is not reasonable to make my LAMP
available online (securi
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:38:30 +0300
Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:16:46 +0300
> > Reco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:32:26AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:46:59 +0300
> > >
On 7/21/21 12:24 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:04:13PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
frank@fedora ~$ stat /
File: /
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 806h/2054d Inode: 2 Links: 18
Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid
Hi,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Plain old HDDs and SSDs also work for "immutable" backups: just don't
> keep them connected to the host after you've done the backup.
But how do you keep the system from messing them up during the first
backup after the malware took over ?
Reco wrote before i asked a
Hi.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:12:52PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-07-21 12:36 p.m., James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> > "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how? Optical media?
> > Enormous decks of Hollerith cards? Enormous reels of punched paper
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:36:37AM -0700, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how?
In a dull enterprise world they usually used tape libraries for that.
It's not popular these days, but still used here and there.
"Cloud backups" are getting their share, alth
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 12:57 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:39:49PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> > > Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: ( 1000/ frank)
>
> > Actually, access 555 means everyone can Read and Execute, but nobody can
> > Update.
> >
> > R
Hi,
On 2021-07-21 12:36 p.m., James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how? Optical media?
> Enormous decks of Hollerith cards? Enormous reels of punched paper tape?
>
There's only one real type of very effective immutable backup : Stone,
Pick and Hammer And
Hi,
James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> "Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how? Optical media?
Yes. BD-R single layer are affordable and can take 25 GB each. With some
compression you can put the whole operating system and the most important
user data onto a single medium.
BD-R is also usabl
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:39:49PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> > Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: ( 1000/ frank)
> Actually, access 555 means everyone can Read and Execute, but nobody can
> Update.
>
> Root usually overrides that, which could explain why it still works.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 12:12 PM Frank McCormick
wrote:
> On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick <
> debianl...@videotron.ca> wrote:
> >> Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye.
> >>
> >>
> >> Setting
On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 12:04 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick
> > wrote:
> > > Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye.
> > >
> > >
> > > Setting up systemd (24
"Immutable backups." Interesting concept. But how? Optical media?
Enormous decks of Hollerith cards? Enormous reels of punched paper tape?
So far as I'm aware, there is *only one* operating system currently in
wide use, that has never been successfully infected with malware outside
of laborato
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:04:13PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> frank@fedora ~$ stat /
> File: /
> Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
> Device: 806h/2054d Inode: 2 Links: 18
> Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 1000/ frank)
On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick
wrote:
Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye.
Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / →
/run during canonicalization of /run. Detect
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 10:38 AM Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:16:46 +0300
> > Reco wrote:
> >
> >
> > browsers are just full of vulnerabilities,
>
> True. Every version of Chromium and Firefox fixes at least one.
> Most of said v
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 07:36:09AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
The goalposts were moved in the text that was omitted up there. "Such a
role" refers to the hypothetical generic use of gnome-www-browser to
act as a virtual package (replacing x-www-browser) in all contexts,
not just the dependency
Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> Numbers show that I was incorrect. Let's call it "unlikely" instead of
> "rare". Let the popcon graphs speak for themselves:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firefox-esr
> vs
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?pa
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:16:46 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:32:26AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:46:59 +0300
> > > Reco wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > You cannot catch
Tras la llegada de la Reforma Laboral se han estado modificando ciertas cosas
en los diferentes procesos laborales por parte de las autoridades...
Especialización en el
NUEVO MODELO DE INSPECCIÓN LABORAL EN MÉXICO
Online en Vivo
28 y 29 de Julio 2021
Sabias que... uno de los principales cambios
On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick
wrote:
> Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye.
>
>
> Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / →
> /run during canonicalization of /run. Detected unsafe path transition
> / → /run during
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:16:46 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:32:26AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:46:59 +0300
> > Reco wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > You cannot catch a ransomware cryptolocker using Linux on a desktop,
> >
> > Of course you can,
Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye.
Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / →
/run during canonicalization of /run. Detected unsafe path transition /
→ /run during canonicalization of /run/lock. Detected unsafe path
transition /
Hi.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 07:36:09AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:05:10PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:45:07AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:34:50PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > > One would think that gnome-ww
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Reco
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 at 5:09 AM
> > From: "Reco"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: How do I mount the USB stick containing the installer in
> > Rescue Mode?
> >
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Reco
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 at 5:09 AM
> > From: "Reco"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: How do I mount the USB stick containing the installer in
> > Rescue Mode?
> >
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:05:10PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:45:07AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:34:50PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > One would think that gnome-www-browser virtual package would fit such
> > > role perfectly. I mean, if GNOME DE h
Hi Reco
Thanks for your help.
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 at 5:09 AM
> From: "Reco"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How do I mount the USB stick containing the installer in Rescue
> Mode?
>
> > > What you actually need is to bind mount the directory with packages into
> > >
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:45:07AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:34:50PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > One would think that gnome-www-browser virtual package would fit such
> > role perfectly. I mean, if GNOME DE has some special requirement for a
> > browser, and Debian alre
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:34:50PM +0300, Reco wrote:
One would think that gnome-www-browser virtual package would fit such
role perfectly. I mean, if GNOME DE has some special requirement for a
browser, and Debian already has such aptly named virtual package -
surely it can be considered as a su
Hi.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:17:26PM +0200, Christian Britz wrote:
> > In my case it is meta package gnome-core. It is a pity that it
> > doesn't have an alternative dependency on www-browser, this would be
> > satisfied
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:17:26PM +0200, Christian Britz wrote:
In my case it is meta package gnome-core. It is a pity that it doesn't
have an alternative dependency on www-browser, this would be satisfied
by google-chrome-stable, which I prefer over chromium.
www-browser is not required to b
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:32:26AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:46:59 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > You cannot catch a ransomware cryptolocker using Linux on a desktop,
>
> Of course you can, although it's certainly much less likely than when
> using Windows.
47 matches
Mail list logo
