On 3/31/21 1:33 PM, David Christensen wrote:
$ host -v -t A www.debian.org 192.168.1.254
Dan -- did you run the above test? This may help isolate if the problem
is Debian 10 or your AT&T gateway.
David
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:48:09PM -0400, Dan Norton wrote:
> # cat /etc/resolv.conf
> domain attlocal.net
> search attlocal.net
> nameserver 1.1.1.1
> nameserver 1.0.0.1
> ...and this works very well. I like it because it cuts out more
> of google's monitoring of my browsing (I use Brave browser a
Alexander V. Makartsev on Sat, 3 Apr 2021 01:17:59 +0500 wrote:
"On 02.04.2021 22:56, Dan Norton wrote:
Alexander V. Makartsev wrote Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:16:08 +0500:
"Is "192.168.1.254" an IP address of your DSL modem?
If you don't need to resolve hostnames from you local network, like
"somepc1.a
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:36:51PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, April 02, 2021 04:35:58 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >2) would the caching feature be bypassed if your computer used the
> > >public
> > >
> > > DNS name servers (e.g., 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4, and 1.1.1.1)? (Or if t
On Friday, April 02, 2021 05:15:55 PM Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 03.04.2021 01:15, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Sort of building on this question, and just trying to educate myself, if
> > the
> >
> > DSL modem had a caching nameserver:
> > 1) would your computer need to specify the I
On Friday, April 02, 2021 04:35:58 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:15:07PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Sort of building on this question, and just trying to educate myself, if
> > the
> >
> > DSL modem had a caching nameserver:
> >1) would your computer need to sp
On 03.04.2021 01:15, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Sort of building on this question, and just trying to educate myself, if the
DSL modem had a caching nameserver:
1) would your computer need to specify the IP of that modem (presumably)
192.168.1.254 to take advantage of the caching?
Most of SOH
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:15:07PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sort of building on this question, and just trying to educate myself, if the
> DSL modem had a caching nameserver:
>
>1) would your computer need to specify the IP of that modem (presumably)
> 192.168.1.254 to take advanta
On 02.04.2021 22:56, Dan Norton wrote:
Alexander V. Makartsev wrote Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:16:08 +0500:
"Is "192.168.1.254" an IP address of your DSL modem?
If you don't need to resolve hostnames from you local network, like
"somepc1.attlocal.net" and only want to access the Internet, you can
confi
On Friday, April 02, 2021 01:56:19 PM Dan Norton wrote:
> Alexander V. Makartsev wrote Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:16:08 +0500:
>
> "Is "192.168.1.254" an IP address of your DSL modem?
> If you don't need to resolve hostnames from you local network, like
> "somepc1.attlocal.net" and only want to access th
Alexander V. Makartsev wrote Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:16:08 +0500:
"Is "192.168.1.254" an IP address of your DSL modem?
If you don't need to resolve hostnames from you local network, like
"somepc1.attlocal.net" and only want to access the Internet, you can
configure one or more of the public DNS server
David Wright wrote on Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:50:56 -0500:
"I don't recall your answering Alexander's question: what benefit are
you getting from those two lines? Do you have a number of machines
at home that are being placed in that domain, whose names you
resolve with att's help?"
I don't know, exce
On Wed 31 Mar 2021 at 17:05:57 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
> The option I favor is that the scan is controlled by your own computer,
> but you can trigger new scans by hitting buttons on the scanner
> (i.e. the button-presses get sent to your computer who then decides
> what action to take
Paul M Foster writes:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:46:09PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
[...]
> pdflatex is provided by package texlive-latex-base.
>
> Some hints about which packages might be needed can be seen in pandoc's
> "Suggests":
>
> ~$ aptitude show pandoc
[snip]
Thanks. When I used "-t
On Fri 02 Apr 2021 at 15:27:48 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 02.04.2021 06:11, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > On 2021-04-01 3:51 a.m., Brian Potkin wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Charlie,
> > >
> > > It would appear that you are not subscribed to debian-user. Have you
> > > seen all the replies to
On 02.04.2021 14:23, William Torrez Corea wrote:
Actually i'm moving/migrating from the old iptables/xtables (legacy)
world to the new nftables framework.
I execute step by step the migration process:
1. generate a translation of an iptables/ip6tables command to know
the nftables equivale
On 4/2/21 12:23 PM, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> Actually i'm moving/migrating from the old iptables/xtables (legacy)
> world to the new nftables framework.
>
> I execute step by step the migration process:
>
> 1. generate a translation of an iptables/ip6tables command to know the
> nftable
On 02.04.2021 06:11, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2021-04-01 3:51 a.m., Brian Potkin wrote:
Hello Charlie,
It would appear that you are not subscribed to debian-user. Have you
seen all the replies to your post that await you there?
Yes, I have. I just haven't had time to act on them. I did down
Actually i'm moving/migrating from the old iptables/xtables (legacy) world
to the new nftables framework.
I execute step by step the migration process:
1. generate a translation of an iptables/ip6tables command to know the
nftables equivalent
2. Translate the whole ruleset in a single ru
19 matches
Mail list logo
