Markdown previewer

Dear Colleagues, Can you please advise a good GUI Markdown previewer? Many editors (vim, mousepad) can highlight Markdown syntax, but it's a different matter. I'd like the previewer to display rendered Markdown nicely with fonts, hyperlinks, numbered lists etc. -- Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE http:

Re: "Yay for Debian" origin?

Never heard that kind of file.. Anyway, try to check the metadata inside that file, search md5sum hash file on internet. Maybe you can get something.. -- Email : Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

Joe wrote: > It may not be long before vendors are ranked or even excluded according > to their virtue-signalling activities rather than their products. Yes, I also think this might be the next step ... cause no one is biting on the adds anyway and there are also too many people trying to manipul

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

ghe2001 wrote: > How about DDG as the default, and Google when necessary. yes - this is the present setting here Things I found yesterday in Google, I can not find today and DDG anyway :) I guess Google has already lost track of the data and may be algorithm long time ago, but it's still workin

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 2:42 PM, deloptes wrote: > This was in the beginning. Then it became business and now it is political > and I am not sure anymore if this is exactly what I want, but as said > technical

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:42:48 +0100 deloptes wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > >> Hm. Good point. Of course, Google has a lot more resources than > >> DDG. My hypothesis is that the advantage from that is rather > >> marginal and that they get most of their advantage from search > >> context. Of course

Re: Installationsproblem

Julia, Kurz, Das hat vielleicht zwei Gründe. Zuerst, man braucht nur Video- Stärke höher zu wenden, brighter auf Englisch. Oder vielleicht werden ein DNS-server nicht fand auf Netz. Also probieren Netzwerk config und ISP. HTH Nikko On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 1:06 PM Julia Volovik wrote: > Sehr

Re: Google vs. DDG

On 3/16/21 10:42 PM, deloptes wrote: It is not only resources, it is the algorithm and the personal data in question  - today's news included reference to "privacy labels" : "DuckDuckGo uses App Store privacy labels to call out Google for ‘spying’ on users"  

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

Celejar wrote: >> Hm. Good point. Of course, Google has a lot more resources than DDG. >> My hypothesis is that the advantage from that is rather marginal and >> that they get most of their advantage from search context. Of course, >> I may be wrong (as nearly always ;-) > > It's certainly hard t

Re: Installationsproblem

Am Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:48:43 + (UTC) schrieb Julia Volovik : > Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, > ich habe ein Problem mit meinem Notebook nach der Installation. > Ich habe mit Rufus ein Boot USB erstellt (Debian Version ohne Internet > Anschluss).Auf dem Notebook gab es vorher Windows 7. Es ha

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:49:10AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100 > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > [...] And I do usually access Google without being logged in, with > > > most cookies blocked, NoScript, etc., so in general

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100 wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key > > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn't > > work well for me in certain areas

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: [...] > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn't > work well for me in certain areas of interest to me. Perhaps I'm simply > not sufficiently s

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 15:05:44 +0100 wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 02:47:23PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > > This is nonsense. "The best" without any context is just meaningless. > > > > > > > Come on, you yourself write below why. > > [...] > > > Me too - doin

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

On 16/03/2021 12:20, songbird wrote: Nicholas Geovanis wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 1:50 PM Stefan Monnier wrote: ... FWIW And MIPS was there even a bit earlier with their R4000 (tho the software support for it only appeared some years later: they first wanted to have an installed base to whi

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 1:50 PM Stefan Monnier > wrote: ... >> FWIW And MIPS was there even a bit earlier with their R4000 (tho the >> software support for it only appeared some years later: they first >> wanted to have an installed base to which to deploy the software), w

Debian VMs on a routed libvirt IPv6 ULA network are not exchanging neighbor sollicitations with the host

Hello, we have the following setup: - a libvirt/KVM virtualization physical host running Debian 10 - Debian 10 and RHEL 8/CentOS 8 VMs as guests Guest VMs usually have two (virtio) network interfaces: - a static public interface (IPv4+IPv6 or IPv6 only, usually enp1s0), which access internet via

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 15 mar 21, 11:19:55, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > > Last I heard Debian works on the M1 already :-), but its Emacs package > > doesn't :-( > > No surprise considering Emacs is itself a full OS :p > > (sorry, could not resist

Re: [EVEN MORE OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

Christian Groessler wrote: > On 3/15/21 10:47 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> On Lu, 15 mar 21, 20:24:56, Sven Hartge wrote: >>> (I still vividly remember using memmaker and manual ordering the drivers >>> in config.sys and autoexec.bat to shave another 2KB from the lower >>> memory so the IPX drive