Hi,
lars.fran...@telia.com wrote:
> I was trying to register on the user forum.
If we continue to discuss this, please Cc debian-user@lists.debian.org
because there might be others who know more than i do.
Hopping around in forums.debian.net i got to
"HOWTO contact forum admins"
http://foru
On 9/16/20 6:33 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> Anyone here have any experience with Amazon Workspaces' Linux client?
> https://clients.amazonworkspaces.com/ It looks like it's for Ubuntu
> 18.4. Will Debian Buster be close enough?
>
> I hesitate to install a binary blob from Amazon without first chec
David Wright composed on 2020-09-15 21:38 (UTC-0500):
> I ought to have guessed—I don't know how you keep track of so many!
I have a spreadsheet for tracking several things, such as dates of last
update/upgrade, video card installed, which DE. Each disk's partition inventory
is
comprised mostly
David Wright composed on 2020-09-15 18:50 (UTC-0500):
> But also bear in mind that not so many people have actually run the
> debian-installer itself without Recommended packages being installed.
> I certainly never have (I don't know how to do it), even though at
> one time I ran an already insta
Anyone here have any experience with Amazon Workspaces' Linux client?
https://clients.amazonworkspaces.com/ It looks like it's for Ubuntu
18.4. Will Debian Buster be close enough?
I hesitate to install a binary blob from Amazon without first checking
here.
Thank you.
--
Does anybody read signat
I have a fresh install of Buster which is running MATE as the Desktop
Environment. It has taken me until now to get it working, without
messing up my current Stretch install on the same machine. The next
thing that I want to do is replace systemd with sysvinit. I am not
trying to start a fla
On Tue 15 Sep 2020 at 14:42:11 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2020-09-15 12:32 (UTC-0400):
>
> > Felix's first post came from, I don't quite get.
>
> Fallible memory. I use multiple distros, and do a lot more upgrading than new
> installs. openSUSE, last I installed, a mon
On 9/12/20 12:29 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2020-09-11 22:03 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there any option to have 'dpkg --get-selections' NOT include
automatically installed packages?
No, dpkg has no notion of automatically installed packages, that is an
apt concept.
Otherwise, all packa
On Tue 15 Sep 2020 at 21:23:20 (+0200), Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> Brian writes:
> > On Mon 14 Sep 2020 at 08:12:50 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > The Debian desktop environment installs task-desktop. This package
> > recommends desktop task packages. task-gnome-desktop is the first one
>
On Tue 15 Sep 2020 at 21:23:20 +0200, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Mon 14 Sep 2020 at 08:12:50 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > The Debian desktop environment installs task-desktop. This package
> > recommends desktop task packages. task-gnome-desktop is the first one
Brian writes:
> On Mon 14 Sep 2020 at 08:12:50 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> The Debian desktop environment installs task-desktop. This package
> recommends desktop task packages. task-gnome-desktop is the first one
> listed, so it will be the one installed. In that sense, the installer
> does k
Thanks Reco,
I don't know how you keep up after all these years seen you here on the
debian list.
Congrats.
Beco.
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 11:36, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:19:39AM -0300, Beco wrote:
> > Is this pam module deprecated?
>
> Yes, it was removed fr
Nate Bargmann writes:
> I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am
> unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am
> going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN.
> What I am concerned about is the remote possibility of theft and
David Wright composed on 2020-09-15 12:32 (UTC-0400):
> Felix's first post came from, I don't quite get.
Fallible memory. I use multiple distros, and do a lot more upgrading than new
installs. openSUSE, last I installed, a month ago, puts something on each of
tty1-12. 1 is the installer itself, i
Hi,
Lars Fransén wrote:
> I have created an account, user name LarsGIF, e-mail address
> lars.fran...@telia.com.
The subscription page of this list
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
does not ask for a username, only for a mail address.
So you probably applied somewhere else. Where exactly
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 18:23:07 +0200
Lars Fransén wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created an account, user name LarsGIF, e-mail address
> lars.fran...@telia.com. I am not receiving any mail to activate the
> account.
An account for what, exactly? The mailing list? If you get this then
you're probably
Hello,
I have created an account, user name LarsGIF, e-mail address
lars.fran...@telia.com.
I am not receiving any mail to activate the account.
I have made several attemts to force a send and I have looked in different
folders in my mail client. Please help.
Best regards
Lars
Skickades från
On Tue 15 Sep 2020 at 04:39:49 (+1000), David wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 04:27, David wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 00:10, David Wright wrote:
> > > On Mon 14 Sep 2020 at 19:48:37 (+1000), David wrote:
>
> > > > To explore and confirm and maybe learn something from
> > > > smarter peopl
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:19:39AM -0300, Beco wrote:
> Is this pam module deprecated?
Yes, it was removed from main archive back in 2018 - [1].
> I can't find the package that provides it on
> debian buster.
There's no package in buster that provides the PAM module or ConsoleKit
it
Dear debians,
Is this pam module deprecated? I can't find the package that provides it on
debian buster.
And I get a lot of logs:
CRON: PAM adding faulty module: pam_ck_connector.so
SSHD: PAM adding faulty module: pam_ck_connector.so
unable to dlopen(pam_ck_connector.so): /lib/security/pam_ck_co
On 15/09/2020 10:44, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Another choice would be to run Debian stable, but don't install Debian's
> version of nginx. Use upstream's releases, compile them yourself, and
> update them yourself whenever you need to (for security reasons or
> otherwise).
If one chooses to do so,
On 15/09/2020 10:38, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> No: no new version.
>
> If you're unhappy with that, think about these choices:
>
> - install upcoming Debian 11 (Testing, Bullseye) and live with the changes
> of packages and possible errors in the system. Release date unknown.
>
> - install Debi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> No: no new version.
>
> If you're unhappy with that, think about these choices:
>
> - install upcoming Debian 11 (Testing, Bullseye) and live with the changes
> of packages and possible errors in the system. Release date unknown
Hi Revanth,
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the lat
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1.18.x) to be
Hi Klaus,
Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1.18.x) to be available in
>Ideally, this restriction should be based on
the public key of the pair but I've not seen in sshd_config(5) a way for
the Match directive to use the public key as its trigger
Not an expert but did you look at the certificate based authentication? You
can define your own certificate authority and
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am
> unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am
> going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN.
Use Wireguard. It's available in newer kernels and in backports.
Hi All.
I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am
unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am
going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN.
What I am concerned about is the remote possibility of theft and
therefore exposing my
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:13:04AM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
> 1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patches. So, if
> any
On 9/6/20 11:17 AM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run VB 16.1.14 r140239 on my laptop under Debian Buster.
After sucessfully signing vboxdrv, vboxnetflt and vboxnetadp I
installed the extension package.
Now I have to additionally sign vboxpci.
However, this module was not installe
Hi Revanth,
as you might have found out now, the Debian Security team is backporting
security patches to older versions of OpenSource software, and Debian 10
isn't insecure.
The advantage of backporting is, that you don't have to adapt config files
to latest syntax on an update, nor introduce inc
Hi.
Please do not top post.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:13:04AM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html)
> Nginx 1.14.x is no longer suppor
Hi Klaus,
1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patches. So, if
any security Vulnerabilities arise then system would be at hig
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
>
> We have a system running on Debian 10 with Nginx v1.14.2, GNOME Evolution
> v3.30.5-1.1 installed along with other packages.
>
[...]
> When can we expect latest versions of Nginx and GNOME Evolution to be
> available in Debian 10 ?
Which security bugs do you thi
37 matches
Mail list logo
