Hi,
11 juin 2020 à 02:56 de f...@blakemfg.com:
> On 6/10/20 1:10 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this
>> problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be
>> reported
>> somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 07:27:08AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote:
>
> > It helps create a positive community. Constantly attacking people
> > because you think they're in some way wrong does not.
>
> Who is giving you the right to judge others? This beeing asked politely!
OK
> I
Michael Stone wrote:
> It helps create a positive community. Constantly attacking people
> because you think they're in some way wrong does not.
Who is giving you the right to judge others? This beeing asked politely!
I am honestly fed of this. When I read following:
There is no dilemma
On 2020-06-10 10:13, Matthew Campbell wrote:
I ran a read test first to look for bad sectors on the new hard drive to see if it was damaged by the shipping process.
I use the manufacture toolkit to test and verify drives.
Now I am writing to each sector, after looking around on the drive to i
On 6/10/20 1:10 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this
problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be reported
somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system for some obscure reason
So, with current buster, the installed
On 2020-06-10 07:00, Michael Stone wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:22:39PM +, Matthew Campbell wrote:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb ibs=4096 count=976754646
This command line gets data in 4k chunks from /dev/zero and then writes
them to the disk in 512 byte chunks. That's pretty much th
On 6/10/20 12:10 PM, Henning Follmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:53:53AM -0700, Gary L. Roach wrote:
On 6/10/20 5:17 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On dimanche 7 juin 2020 21:14:20 CEST Gary L. Roach wrote:
I recently up graded this system to Bullseye and then ran into trouble
with the lac
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> It helps create a positive community. Constantly attacking people because
> you think they're in some way wrong does not.
Yes. That is true. What is the link with the current sub-discussion?
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this
problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be reported
somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system for some obscure reason
So, with current buster, the installed version of Thunderbird is 68.8.0.
I have
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> > Because the police raiding my house for dealing drugs is not a
> > realistic threat. Looking at my drives for running Tor could be.
>
> I have tried to explain that your threat assessment is inadequate, y
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 09:51:37PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
Interacting in a polite fashion shouldn't require a paycheck.
What does politeness have to do with it?
It helps create a positive community. Constantly attacking people
because you think they're in
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> Interacting in a polite fashion shouldn't require a paycheck.
What does politeness have to do with it?
We can very politely explain to somebody that their question makes no
sense.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 09:24:08PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
l0f...@tuta.io (12020-06-10):
It's the usual dilemma on mailing-lists/forums:
* Are the respondents supposed to answer the OP question directly without
hindsight (potential XY problem sometimes - http://xyproblem.info/)?
* Or are
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 09:20:50PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
* Are the respondents supposed to answer the OP question directly without
hindsight (potential XY problem sometimes - http://xyproblem.info/)?
* Or are they expected to put the issue into perspective and challenge it? I
know it ca
l0f...@tuta.io (12020-06-10):
> It's the usual dilemma on mailing-lists/forums:
> * Are the respondents supposed to answer the OP question directly without
> hindsight (potential XY problem sometimes - http://xyproblem.info/)?
> * Or are they expected to put the issue into perspective and challen
Hi,
10 juin 2020 à 20:51 de mst...@debian.org:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:02:13PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
>> Both l0f4r0 and I have asked why the OP
>> is zeroing the drive, but no reply yet. Perhaps you can suggest an
>> answer.
>>
> I don't really care why the OP is doing it. I can think
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:53:53AM -0700, Gary L. Roach wrote:
> On 6/10/20 5:17 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > On dimanche 7 juin 2020 21:14:20 CEST Gary L. Roach wrote:
> > > I recently up graded this system to Bullseye and then ran into trouble
> > > with the lack of Qt4 and had to re-install
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:02:13PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
I tried to make clear that my use case differed from that of the OP,
in case you missed that. Just before lockdown (=lockout). I borrowed
an AIO computer and, to make room, returned a 2006 vintage tower that
would no longer pass its PO
Perfil técnico, experiencia, trato con la gente, liderazgo, entre otros…
HABILIDADES DIRECTIVAS para el
GERENTE DE SISTEMAS
(Chief Information Officer)
30 de Junio 2020 / Online en Vivo
¡DESARROLLA LAS HABILIDADES PARA DIRIGIR PERSONAS, TOMAR DECISIONES
Y GARANTIZAR LA INFORMACIÓN Y LA INFRAE
On 6/10/20 5:17 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On dimanche 7 juin 2020 21:14:20 CEST Gary L. Roach wrote:
I recently up graded this system to Bullseye and then ran into trouble
with the lack of Qt4 and had to re-install Buster. The installation
went fine until kde desktop tried to start. The syste
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 12:01 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 12:05:57 (-0400), Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > Something that has always bugged me (and #debian hasn't yet answered)
> >
> > What establishes the IPv6 loopback ::1 address, and why is there no need
> > for "iface lo inet6 l
On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 10:14:02 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:01:13PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Mon 08 Jun 2020 at 20:22:39 (+), Matthew Campbell wrote:
> > > I bought a new 4 terrabyte hard drive that is connected with a
> > > USB cable using USB2. It took a
On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 12:05:57 (-0400), Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Something that has always bugged me (and #debian hasn't yet answered)
>
> What establishes the IPv6 loopback ::1 address, and why is there no need
> for "iface lo inet6 loopback" in /etc/network/interfaces?
AFAICT there's code in linu
I wipe a new drive for two reasons.
1) I like to make sure it's nice and clean which makes me comfortable. It
bothers me if I don't.
2) I can make a reasonable determination about which sectors were used when
setting up the partition table(s) and any boot loaders so I know which sectors
were u
Something that has always bugged me (and #debian hasn't yet answered)
What establishes the IPv6 loopback ::1 address, and why is there no need
for "iface lo inet6 loopback" in /etc/network/interfaces?
-Jim P.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:53:17PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 iun 20, 10:00:48, Michael Stone wrote:
IME performance peaks at 16-64k. Beyond that things don't improve, and can
potentially get worse or cause other issues.
Even so, bs=1M is easy to remember and type ;)
I don't fin
On Mi, 10 iun 20, 10:00:48, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> IME performance peaks at 16-64k. Beyond that things don't improve, and can
> potentially get worse or cause other issues.
Even so, bs=1M is easy to remember and type ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signa
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:01:13PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 08 Jun 2020 at 20:22:39 (+), Matthew Campbell wrote:
I bought a new 4 terrabyte hard drive that is connected with a USB
cable using USB2. It took about 32 hours to read every sector on the
drive to look for bad sectors.
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:22:39PM +, Matthew Campbell wrote:
I bought a new 4 terrabyte hard drive that is connected with a USB cable using
USB2. It took about 32 hours to read every sector on the drive to look for bad
sectors. I started blanking the sectors using /dev/zero last Friday night
Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> Because the police raiding my house for dealing drugs is not a
> realistic threat. Looking at my drives for running Tor could be.
I have tried to explain that your threat assessment is inadequate, you
do not want to listen. Fine, keep wasting your time on your own
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:33 PM Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> > Except wiping a disk is trivial. Just start the job and come back
> > later to a clean disk. It's not like you have to wipe it by hand. I do
> > it routinely before I put a disk to use that's going to be
On 2020-06-10 at 09:27, Nicolas George wrote:
> The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
What's with the stray 1, here?
>> I subscribe to probably dozens of mailing lists, and I don't know
>> of any way to configure things to add that header with a proper
>> value automatically on a per-mailing-list basis. O
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:17 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> > Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's
> a
> > misuse of the reply-to header.
>
> A misuse that works, compared to non-misuses that regularly bring back
> "don't cc me" subth
Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> Except wiping a disk is trivial. Just start the job and come back
> later to a clean disk. It's not like you have to wipe it by hand. I do
> it routinely before I put a disk to use that's going to be used for a
> couple of years.
There is no "except" about: define
The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
> I subscribe to probably dozens of mailing lists, and I don't know of any
> way to configure things to add that header with a proper value
> automatically on a per-mailing-list basis. Otherwise, I'd probably have
> done this years ago, unless other considerations (e.g.,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:14 PM Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> > Too bad if you end up in a routine police investigation and they find
> > child pornography when scanning the disks for deleted files.
> >
> > "Must have been the previous owner" is a valid defense, but I
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's a
misuse of the reply-to header.
A misuse that works,
Except for the things that it breaks, and the cases for which it doesn'
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's a
> misuse of the reply-to header.
A misuse that works, compared to non-misuses that regularly bring back
"don't cc me" subthreads. At some points, the religion of "properly"
using headers need
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Instead of writing this periodically, you could include:
Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
in your headers just like I did. Properly configured mailing-list
software does it by default for subscribed users, but Debian is an
exce
On dimanche 7 juin 2020 21:14:20 CEST Gary L. Roach wrote:
> I recently up graded this system to Bullseye and then ran into trouble
> with the lack of Qt4 and had to re-install Buster. The installation
> went fine until kde desktop tried to start. The system froze with the
> following message:
>
Anders Andersson (12020-06-10):
> Too bad if you end up in a routine police investigation and they find
> child pornography when scanning the disks for deleted files.
>
> "Must have been the previous owner" is a valid defense, but I'd rather
> not end up having to use it.
Ah, but maybe the previo
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Jude DaShiell (12020-06-09):
> > High security operations do this routinely. They properly don't trust
> > parts are as labeled from manufacturers especially manufacturers that
> > send any of their stuff or get any of their stuff from Chin
On 09.06.20 23:55, Default User wrote:
(...)
Now, a final note.
When I did my main install, it was a day or two before the release of
Buster 10.0. I immediately upgraded to Unstable. But it is still
originally based upon Stretch. It was set up with both root and user
passwords. And I use good
43 matches
Mail list logo
