(I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users
lists.)
Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us
Anyone using it?
Issues?
Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories?
On 2020-02-29 20:20, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 27 Feb 2020 at 17:13:26 (-0500), John Kaufmann wrote:
On 2020-02-27 09:41, Lee wrote:
[The free/non-free distinction] ... is well-explained, and in fuzzy principle I
like the explanation. In functional terms, it only became an issue for me when
On Thu 27 Feb 2020 at 17:13:26 (-0500), John Kaufmann wrote:
> On 2020-02-27 09:41, Lee wrote:
> > On 2/27/20, John Kaufmann wrote:
>
> > > ... I'm beginning to get a sense
> > > that debian.org has /way/ over-complicated the installation images.
> >
> > I think they don't do a good job of explai
On Sat 29 Feb 2020 at 19:17:39 (+0100), Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> I have an encrypted (LUKSv2) LVM setup with a separate unencrypted /boot/
> partition. When I install a new kenrel in the system, the following symlinks
> are
> created in the root directory (/):
>
> # ls -al /
> ...
>
songbird wrote:
> Keith Christian wrote:
> > Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> > similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> > native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
> >
> > I realize that software has been installed ou
I have an encrypted (LUKSv2) LVM setup with a separate unencrypted /boot/
partition. When I install a new kenrel in the system, the following symlinks are
created in the root directory (/):
# ls -al /
...
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2020-02-14 17:22:18 initrd.im
On 2/29/2020 6:20 PM, deloptes wrote:
> john doe wrote:
>
>> I would rather look there to get it working with your current setup.
>>
>
> looks like dnsmasq is more cooperative - I don't know how to do it with the
> current setup :/
>
>>> It seems however dnsmasq does the job
>>> with just few lines
john doe wrote:
> I would rather look there to get it working with your current setup.
>
looks like dnsmasq is more cooperative - I don't know how to do it with the
current setup :/
>> It seems however dnsmasq does the job
>> with just few lines in the configuration.
>> So I am wondering if I c
On 2/29/2020 4:08 PM, deloptes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running isc-dhcp-server, bind9 and tftp-hpa. All machines can do
> diskless boot (i386, amd64 and rpi3) except rpi4. I couldn't bring the dhcp
> and tftp server to work together.
I would rather look there to get it working with your current setu
Keith Christian wrote:
> Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
>
> I realize that software has been installed outside of APT's purview
> sinc
Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
...
> I activelly follow the development of some programs in diverse areas
> (ham radio, astronomy, emulators, etc), and new versions usually
> appears in unstable months after release. The more prominent example
> is the kernel itself. Current version is 5.5.7, but unstabl
Hi,
I am running isc-dhcp-server, bind9 and tftp-hpa. All machines can do
diskless boot (i386, amd64 and rpi3) except rpi4. I couldn't bring the dhcp
and tftp server to work together. It seems however dnsmasq does the job
with just few lines in the configuration.
So I am wondering if I can allocat
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:46:27AM -0700, Keith Christian wrote:
> Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
dh-make-perl, gem2deb,
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 7:08 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > It's just like the machine is
> > suddenly being powered by an 8080 instead of an E3815...
>
> Lacking any ideas what might be the problem, i'd try Live ISOs of
> Debian 9 and Debian 8 whether their systems show
Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
I realize that software has been installed outside of APT's purview
since the beginnings of Debian, but I
I have a friend who works as a system administrator that always says:
Debian Stable --> Debian Server
Debian Testing --> Debian Desktop Moderate
Debian Unstable --> Debian Desktop Fast
Being Moderate and Fast the speed at you will eat new bugs.
As time goes by, I'm more and more agree with him.
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 02:31:25PM +0100, gru...@mailfence.com wrote:
> how can i find what package is responsible for installing a file. for example
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config. apt-file returns nothng and dpkg -S returns
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
how can i find what package is responsible for installing a file. for
example /etc/ssh/sshd_config. apt-file returns nothng and dpkg -S returns
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
on another note, is there a mailing list just for the package manager?
Hi,
G.W. Haywood wrote:
> It's just like the machine is
> suddenly being powered by an 8080 instead of an E3815...
Lacking any ideas what might be the problem, i'd try Live ISOs of
Debian 9 and Debian 8 whether their systems show the same problem.
Older ISOs are at
https://cdimage.debian.org/m
Hi there,
Thanks Dan and Greg (again), Stefan, Tixy, Thomas, and as before keep
those ideas coming. I'm still baffled but we'll get there. I have to
say that I'm well impressed by the quality of all the responses, and
even where some of the suggestions have been to try things that I've
already
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Sam wrote:
> Thanks for your points of view! I agree that Stable comes at a cost, and of
> course if I ever were to set up a server Debian would probably be my choice.
>
> Regarding derivatives, I know about Ubuntu, Mint, etc., but I don't exactly
> like
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:49:28AM +0100, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> deloptes wrote:
> > +1 :( and I am not using standard port 22, so they scanned all 3 ports
> > and found out what is open (well filtered) and now are trying to do brute
> > force on SSH. Others are trying to exploit apache/php &
22 matches
Mail list logo
