On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 22:23:20 +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:09:20 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 20:33:12 +0100, Joe wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:07:36 +0100
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Ease up? Perhaps.
> > > >
> > > > The "in gener
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:09:20 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 20:33:12 +0100, Joe wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:07:36 +0100
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Ease up? Perhaps.
> > >
> > > The "in general" is interesting and informative. Suppose the USPS,
> > > Royal Mail or
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Franklin, Jason wrote:
I'm working on a project that requires me to debug a running screen locker.
Currently, my workflow involves switching between the screen locker and virtual
console #1 (/dev/tty1) using Ctrl-Alt-F1 and Ctrl-Alt-F7. This way, I can
Greetings,
I'm working on a project that requires me to debug a running screen locker.
Currently, my workflow involves switching between the screen locker and virtual
console #1 (/dev/tty1) using Ctrl-Alt-F1 and Ctrl-Alt-F7. This way, I can
interact with the screen locker until I hit a break p
On Mi, 21 aug 19, 20:07:36, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 13:19:32 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> > Please ease up! I do not advocate this in general and I made
> > the limited use very clear. If a local plumber with 5 employees
> > uses this just for his business no freedom of speech
On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 20:33:12 +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:07:36 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> >
> > Ease up? Perhaps.
> >
> > The "in general" is interesting and informative. Suppose the USPS,
> > Royal Mail or Deutsche Post etc decided the point of origin or the
> > destination for
On 2019-08-21 20:07, Brian wrote:
The epitomy of this is the discrimination against dynamic addresses.
Want
to be a mail second class citizen on the Net? Easy; don't have a static
address. Want to be homeless and send or receive a letter - Royal Mail
will not stop you. Email is a solution which
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:07:36 +0100
Brian wrote:
>
> Ease up? Perhaps.
>
> The "in general" is interesting and informative. Suppose the USPS,
> Royal Mail or Deutsche Post etc decided the point of origin or the
> destination for a mail was a criterion in their delivery policy? What
> a world we
On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 13:19:32 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 08:38:13PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 20 Aug 2019 at 14:43:08 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > >
> > > In some cases I block complete regions (geoip blocking). This
> > > obviously works onl
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:51:35 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 02:44:22 PM Joe wrote:
> > I would be. Every day I read an email from my server listing every
> > sender's email address where my server has refused to accept the
> > mail and which were sent to one of the t
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:12:59PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:58:05 -0400
> Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I also block constantcontact and mailchimp, because they are basically
> > commercial spamming services and anyone can add anyone on any mailing list.
>
> See, t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 05:21:14PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:46:11AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:42:43PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > >On Tue 20/Aug/2019 19:26:23 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
> > >>>If you are not spamming people
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:51:22PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:45:52PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > I was referring to "add your MTA for no good reason".
> > That is vague and really not true.
>
> Why do you think that? Your ability to find out why a specific dom
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 07:43:26AM +1000, elvis wrote:
>
> > No need to. I have a single question - do you use SpamAssassin or Rspamd?
> >
> >
> >
> I installed postgrey, my spam went from maybe 10 a day (that were caught by
> spammassain) to maybe 1 or 2 a month.
>
postgrey has some severe
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 08:38:13PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 20 Aug 2019 at 14:43:08 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > In some cases I block complete regions (geoip blocking). This
> > obviously works only for "local" mailservers.
> > But if you business doesn't have international
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 02:44:22 PM Joe wrote:
> I would be. Every day I read an email from my server listing every
> sender's email address where my server has refused to accept the mail
> and which were sent to one of the three real names my server deals
> with.
So, is that from your own ema
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 23:11:27 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
As an example, see https://www.spamhaus.org/dbl/ and "RHSBL"
These lists are used for content inspection
So you didn't look for what RHSBL means? The level of "my experie
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 23:11:27 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:10:08PM +0300, Reco wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 08:39:43PM +0300, Reco wrote:
Unless a blacklist adds victims by AS number, a change of M
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:46:11AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:42:43PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> >On Tue 20/Aug/2019 19:26:23 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
> >>>If you are not spamming people you also will not end up on a blacklist.
> >>
> >>Well, actual real-world
Total story not understood but it seems as if apt had got the new kernel
package before the notification if the security issues. It just needed
a reboot. I suppose I must have assumed it was a new issue
Thank you for the support which eventually led me to the solution.
==John ffitch
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43:18AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> wooledg:~$ ls -l /etc/environment.d
> total 8
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20 Aug 21 10:18 11-foo.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Feb 9 2019 90qt-a11y.conf
> wooledg:~$ cat /etc/environment.d/90qt-a11y.conf
> QT_ACCESSIBILITY=1
> woole
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:42:43PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 19:26:23 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
If you are not spamming people you also will not end up on a blacklist.
Well, actual real-world experience shows that to not be true.
You should (noisily) bring out that
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:19:07AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 02:48:45AM +, Vipul wrote:
> > I asked this on #gnome:gnome.org they said try ~/.config/environment.d/
Further investigation of this thing. So far, I am not impressed.
The first thing I attempted was to
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 19:26:23 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
>> If you are not spamming people you also will not end up on a blacklist.
>
> Well, actual real-world experience shows that to not be true.
You should (noisily) bring out that case!
Blacklists have to balance between reliability and comple
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 02:48:45AM +, Vipul wrote:
> (output is empty string that means TEST_BASH variable is unset. see
> below output of hd command)
>
> $ hd <<< "$TEST_BASH"
> 0a|.|
> 0001
I prefer printf %s "$variable" | od -tx
Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-20:
> mm/memory.o: warning: objtool: remap_pfn_range()+0xd5: unsupported
> intra-function call
>
> that it's part of linux-kbuild-4.19 package maybe I should submit a bug
> report to this package or is another one a better choice?
Hi Franco,
Should you submit a bug re
26 matches
Mail list logo
