Gene Heskett wrote:
> Its good that we can fix it, BUT IF you are going to restrict where we
> keep logfiles like this then FIX the /var/log perms so that fetchmail,
> procmail, spamassassin, clamav and its ilk, running as the user can
> access /var/log to keep its logs. Debian's legendary parano
On 13.08.19 00:38, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Its good that we can fix it, BUT IF you are going to restrict where we
> keep logfiles like this then FIX the /var/log perms so that fetchmail,
> procmail, spamassassin, clamav and its ilk, running as the user can
> access /var/log to keep its logs. Debi
On 2019-08-13 00:38 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[rant skipped]
> So just where in tunket _are_ we supposed to be able to keep our logs
> then? A place that Just Works would sure be appreciated.
Putting them under /home is fine, see this comment in
/lib/systemd/system/logrotate.service:
,
| #
On 2019-08-13 06:59 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> phi...@treads.nz [2019-08-13T09:30:34+12] wrote:
>
>> I just updated from Debian 8 to 9 and I'm getting the following error.
>> I'm guessing it's something to do with permissions?
>>
>> Something to do with the create 640 root adm?
>>
>> /etc/cro
On Monday 12 August 2019 23:59:39 Teemu Likonen wrote:
> phi...@treads.nz [2019-08-13T09:30:34+12] wrote:
> > I just updated from Debian 8 to 9 and I'm getting the following
> > error. I'm guessing it's something to do with permissions?
> >
> > Something to do with the create 640 root adm?
> >
>
phi...@treads.nz [2019-08-13T09:30:34+12] wrote:
> I just updated from Debian 8 to 9 and I'm getting the following error.
> I'm guessing it's something to do with permissions?
>
> Something to do with the create 640 root adm?
>
> /etc/cron.daily/logrotate:
> error: unable to open /home/philip/lo
>> btw which option should i add to mplayer command line
>> so that it play only audio part (not video part) of a file?
$ mplayer -novideo file
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:13:33 + (UTC)
Long Wind wrote:
> i want to run adobe pdf reader on jessie for amd64
> the last adobe reader 4 unix is for 32bit, i'm afraid it can't run on 64bit
> system
You want to research multiarch -- multiple architectures. But your CPU
MUST support 32-bit emula
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 05:04, Lee wrote:
> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:56:46PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> What's the difference between ${d} and "${d}"? Or is that a bashism
>> also? (all my scripts use /bin/sh so I'm pretty clueless wrt bash)
> >
> > For more deta
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:40:03 +0200, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> You
> could start by telling us which DM it is (lightdm, gdm3, sddm, etc.).
gdm3
And I don't know to let the limits take effect within this environment.
Regards
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:40:03 +0200, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> You
> could start by telling us which DM it is (lightdm, gdm3, sddm, etc.).
gdm3
And I don't know to let the limits take effect within this environment.
Regards
--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:40:03 +0200, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> You
> could start by telling us which DM it is (lightdm, gdm3, sddm, etc.).
gdm3
And I don't know to let the limits take effect within this environment.
Regards
--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
Afternoon,
I just updated from Debian 8 to 9 and I'm getting the following error.
I'm guessing it's something to do with permissions?
Something to do with the create 640 root adm?
/etc/cron.daily/logrotate:
error: unable to open /home/philip/logs/access.log.1 for compression
error: unable to
On 12/8/19 11:23 pm, Keith Steensma wrote:
The same thing happens if I fill in 'root' as the login even though a
'root' login is not permitted in the default 'sshd_config'
configuration. Even when I change the configuration to allow for
'root' login, 'root' can never login.
Try a local
On 2019-08-12 15:45, Keith Steensma wrote:
Just shows SSH started and stopped.?? I may have to modify the start up
routine to include something.
I think I might have had an issue going from windows putty to Linux with
the windows line endings in the public key.
I think I've changed the encodi
On Lu, 12 aug 19, 08:23:17, Keith Steensma wrote:
> I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and found
> that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm doing
> something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no modification.
>
> With Secure Shell server i
On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:56:46PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> What's the difference between ${d} and "${d}"? Or is that a bashism
>> also? (all my scripts use /bin/sh so I'm pretty clueless wrt bash)
>
> This applies to both sh and bash.
>
> An unquoted substitution,
On Lu, 12 aug 19, 08:49:34, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> The other tip about kernel install selection is to install something
> like kernel-i386 or kernel-x86 without all of the long version numbers
> as suffixes in their names.
This is a good idea in general. For the amd64 architecture the package
nam
On Lu, 12 aug 19, 08:38:47, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> I don't have any kind of statistics for how many programs use one vs.
> the other. It's not trivial to find out.
/etc/localtime gets many more hits on https://codesearch.debian.net, if
you consider this to be a relevant metric.
FWIW, accord
Martin McCormick wrote:
> The tesseract utility flawlessly converted the sample jpg
> in to ASCII text so I tried that
> other Linux box's VGA port. This certainly looks like not much
> of anything but I was happy to get it:
>
> Debian GNU/Linux 10 audios tty
>
> audio3 login: [43431.2943
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:56:46PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> What's the difference between ${d} and "${d}"? Or is that a bashism
> also? (all my scripts use /bin/sh so I'm pretty clueless wrt bash)
This applies to both sh and bash.
An unquoted substitution, like $d or ${d}, undergoes several steps. T
On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:37:16PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:19:45PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> >> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> >> > P.S. it would also have been possible to work around the carriage
>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:37:16PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:19:45PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> >> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >> > P.S. it would also have been possible to work around the carriage
> >> > return
> >> > issues with IFS, but
On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:19:45PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> > P.S. it would also have been possible to work around the carriage
>> > return
>> > issues with IFS, but your dos2unix approach is perfectly valid as well.
>>
>> Just ou
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:19:45PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > P.S. it would also have been possible to work around the carriage return
> > issues with IFS, but your dos2unix approach is perfectly valid as well.
>
> Just out of curiosity - how?
while IFS=$' \t\r\n' r
On 8/12/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 02:10:06PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>> Thanks to all that shared their expertise.
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>> while IFS= read -r d
>> do
>> cd "${d}_apo-3k9b"
>> echo "${d}_apo-3k9b"
>> echo "${d}_apo-3k9b.dpf"
>> /home/com
Dan Ritter writes:
> fswebcam is a package that captures images from V4L2 devices.
> It's command-line driven and has a few useful features like
> resizing, averaging multiple frames, and skipping early frames
> for devices that take a while to focus. It writes JPEG or PNG.
>
> Remember to make y
I recently installed buster on a machine so that I could install kodi
on it for the purpose of playing Internet content on my lounge AV
setup. It all worked fine with a regular monitor.
On trying to get it connected to the AV setup today, I get a rather
strange problem. All text mode display is ab
On 8/12/2019 4:42 PM, Keith Steensma wrote:
>
>
> On 8/12/2019 9:18 AM, john doe wrote:
>> On 8/12/2019 3:23 PM, Keith Steensma wrote:
>>> I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
>>> found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
>>> doing someth
On 8/12/2019 9:34 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Keith Steensma wrote:
On 8/12/2019 9:23 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and found
that both version seem to have the same
On 8/12/2019 4:34 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Keith Steensma wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/12/2019 9:23 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and found
that both version seem t
Is there anything useful in /var/log/sshd.log?
Bruce
On 8/12/19 9:23 AM, Keith Steensma wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
doing something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no m
On 8/12/2019 9:18 AM, john doe wrote:
On 8/12/2019 3:23 PM, Keith Steensma wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
doing something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no modification.
On Mon 12 Aug 2019 at 07:59:03 (+), Long Wind wrote:
>
> for reason i don't know, i see your reply just an hour ago, sorry for delay!
>
> i'm not sure if power key is key on keyboard or button on PC case
If the one on the PC case got stuck, I would expect the machine to
power down. So look
On 2019-08-12 15:22, Keith Steensma wrote:
Using
"PermitRootLogin Yes"
"PubkeyAuthentication yes"
and a SSH key created under putty and placed in the proper location in
the 'root' directory, still gives a "Server refused our Key"
I can't remember.
perhaps you have to restart sshd after changing
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
>
>
> On 8/12/2019 9:23 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
> > > I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
> > > found
> > > that both versio
Keith Steensma wrote:
>
>
> On 8/12/2019 9:23 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
> > > I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
> > > found
> > > that both version seem to have the same problem. It's li
On 8/12/2019 9:23 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and found
that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm doing
something wrong. But these are fre
On 08/12/2019 09:39 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 02:10:06PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Thanks to all that shared their expertise.
#!/bin/bash
while IFS= read -r d
do
cd "${d}_apo-3k9b"
echo "${d}_apo-3k9b"
echo "${d}_apo-3k9b.dpf"
/home/comp/Apps/
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Keith Steensma wrote:
> I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and found
> that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm doing
> something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no modification.
>
> With Secure
On 8/12/2019 3:23 PM, Keith Steensma wrote:
> I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
> found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
> doing something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no modification.
>
> With Secure Shell server installe
On 2019-08-12 14:33, Judah Richardson wrote:
Try logging in as a user that has sudo power.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 08:31 Keith Steensma
wrote:
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
doing some
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 02:10:06PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Thanks to all that shared their expertise.
>
> #!/bin/bash
> while IFS= read -r d
> do
> cd "${d}_apo-3k9b"
> echo "${d}_apo-3k9b"
> echo "${d}_apo-3k9b.dpf"
> /home/comp/Apps/Autodock/autodock4 -p "${d}_apo-3k9b.
Try logging in as a user that has sudo power.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 08:31 Keith Steensma
wrote:
> I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
> found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
> doing something wrong. But these are fresh installs -
> Il giorno dom 11 ago 2019 alle ore 05:30 Hongyi Zhao
> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I added the following lines into /etc/security/limits.conf:
> >
> > * - nofile 65535
> > root - nofile 65535
> >
> >
> > But it still not take effect for the normal user.
How are you logging in? How are you c
I've installed both Version 9.9 (OldStable) and 'Buster' (Stable) and
found that both version seem to have the same problem. It's like I'm
doing something wrong. But these are fresh installs - no modification.
With Secure Shell server installed and running on port 22 (or any other
port of yo
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:38:47AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:16:04PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > If you're desparate to get the timezone altered earlier in your
> > installation process, you could always do it manually: try switching
> > to VC2 and editing the file
The other tip about kernel install selection is to install something
like kernel-i386 or kernel-x86 without all of the long version numbers
as suffixes in their names. You get those kernels by default unless you
run install with expert operational in which case you then get presented
with all of t
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:16:04PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> If you're desparate to get the timezone altered earlier in your
> installation process, you could always do it manually: try switching
> to VC2 and editing the file /target/etc/timezone to the string UTC
> (the alternatives are simply
yes
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
You have updated /etc/apt-get/sources.list and replaced testing with
buster in all locations too and this failure continues?
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, john wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:12:39
From: john
To: Holger Skidzun
Cc: debian-user@lists.de
You have updated /etc/apt-get/sources.list and replaced testing with
buster in all locations too and this failure continues?
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, john wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:12:39
From: john
To: Holger Skidzun
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade ?
Resent-Dat
Since installing buster on a new laptop I have noticed that selected text
doesn't show as highlighted.
I have had no such problems with stretch, but they were upgrades in-place
from previous installations--buster was installed new.
I am using the same .emacs.d for customizations
Thanks.
Best re
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 01:11:43PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> The internet download speed as measured by (speedtest.net) is ~15 Mbps
> when I try to connect from my desktop. From a different machine (my
> laptop), I get around ~30-40 Mbps. Could you please tell me how to fix
> this?
>
> Ne
No I did not; I checked that again kjust niw but sill no upgrade.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Holger Skidzun wrote:
Did you by chance forgot apt-get update?
Cheers, Holger
Mit freundlichem Gruß!
Le 12 août 2019 à 12:35, John a écrit :
I received a notification from the Debian security list sayin
Did you by chance forgot apt-get update?
Cheers, Holger
Mit freundlichem Gruß!
> Le 12 août 2019 à 12:35, John a écrit :
>
> I received a notification from the Debian security list saying that
> there were a number of fixes to the kernel and saying I should update
> my buster system; "For the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:35:34AM +0100, John wrote:
> I received a notification from the Debian security list saying that
> there were a number of fixes to the kernel and saying I should update
> my buster system; "For the stable distribution (buster), these
> problems have been fixed in version
I received a notification from the Debian security list saying that
there were a number of fixes to the kernel and saying I should update
my buster system; "For the stable distribution (buster), these
problems have been fixed in version 4.19.37-5+deb10u2."
However apt does not seem to know about t
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 04:44:32PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
[...]
> So, "Linux MD RAID 10" can be RAID 1, RAID 10, or something totally
> different.
>
>
> Co-opting and redefining standard terms is bad engineering.
To be honest, and as I remember, the term RAID-10 was doomed from the
ge
On 11/08/2019 21:48, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 20:19:07 +0100
> Paul Sutton wrote:
>
>> To reply to my previous post. I did a little more digging and have
>> produced a 2nd blog post with the results :
>>
>> http://zleap.net/lxde-menu-2/
>>
>> Still got a few questions presented at the
59 matches
Mail list logo
