Re: [fixed] Re: Numeric keypad not working on Gnome lock screen

2019-07-01 Thread andreimpopescu
On Lu, 01 iul 19, 17:23:41, Steven Post wrote: > > The issue disappeared after removing 'zoom' (a meeting application) and > its dependency ibus. This would be worth a bug report against ibus. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser signature.asc Description: PGP sig

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread David Wright
On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 15:56:14 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 01 July 2019 09:33:35 David Wright wrote: > > On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 06:05:52 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Hesk

Buster RC2 , KDE , icons's untuitive interactions.

2019-07-01 Thread aprekates
KDE Plasma 5.14.5 I drag and drop a menu entry (e.g: firefox) on the desktop and i choose a copy to be made. I notice that the icon will have a (!) on it until i execute it first. ( why is the '!' needed?) So : $ cd Desktop $ ls -rw-r--r--  1 chomwitt chomwitt 5,0K Μαΐ   2  2018 org.kde.kcalc.d

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Matthew Crews
On 7/1/19 10:24 AM, Default User wrote: > Hi. > > Easy question, maybe hard to answer . . .  > > Is someone has an existing conventional Unstable setup (nothing exotic > in hardware or software), what if any special actions should be taken > before, during, or after the impending release of the n

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Ansgar
Default User writes: > Or something like > systemd infects the distribution or its rate of metastasis accelerates, I think we should make systemd mandatory; it would help make Debian a more welcoming distribution by making toxic people hopefully finally go away. Ansgar

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 11:18:18PM +0200, deloptes wrote: > Joe wrote: > > > Presumably, apt-get will be dropped one day, but apt is already the > > preferred system, with more functionality than apt-get. > > AFAIK apt is frontend to apt-get, or I am wrong? They're both front-ends to the APT lib

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread deloptes
Joe wrote: > Presumably, apt-get will be dropped one day, but apt is already the > preferred system, with more functionality than apt-get. AFAIK apt is frontend to apt-get, or I am wrong?

Re: Update Stretch to Buster sources.list file

2019-07-01 Thread bw
In-Reply-To: <7f9ebbad-9966-ab81-ca75-8b6fb5154...@disroot.org> >What is the best way to edit the above anything from the 0ad reference >and below, or should I comment these out and once buster is out add in >the correct lines from the various source websites (e.g for 0ad the >website will have t

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:25:17PM +0100, Joe wrote: > Presumably, apt-get will be dropped one day, but apt is already the > preferred system, with more functionality than apt-get. For GNU's sake, _dselect_ is still packaged! I can't imagine apt-get going anywhere, so long as Debian lives. Not i

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Joe
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:34:55 -0400 Default User wrote: > > Well, a recent thread about encrypted file systems got me to thinking. > > What if a new Stable release introduces a major change to the existing > distribution technology or methodology? > > For example, a new default filesystem is in

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 03:56:14PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: Whole filesystem encryption would be a total non-starter for me. File by file with different passwd's according to whats in the file would make far more sense to me. Thats my $0.02. In which case none of cryptsetup/luks/dm-crypt, ec

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Dan Ritter
Default User wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 13:51 Brian wrote: > > What if a new Stable release introduces a major change to the existing > distribution technology or methodology? > > For example, a new default filesystem is introduced. Or something like > systemd infects the distribution or it

Re: Choice of VMs under i386 Stretch?

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Matthew Crews wrote: > On 7/1/19 10:35 AM, Curt wrote: >> On 2019-07-01, Matthew Crews wrote: >>> >>> At a cursory glance, it does NOT appear that DVD-1 contains any VM Host >>> software, other than perhaps nspawn (which is part of Systemd). >> >> Isn't nspawn a chroot container?

Re: Re: Please consider unblocking Chromium and linux packages for Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Carl Fink
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:17:45PM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > For newbies peeking in, every single one of those 91 incoming > *upgraded* packages is OVERWRITING... OBLITERATING.. the otherwise > stable packages that Developers manually tweaked especially for one's > currently installed Debia

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 July 2019 09:33:35 David Wright wrote: > On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 06:05:52 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > >At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug.

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 July 2019 09:14:07 Curt wrote: > On 2019-07-01, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug. That last is > >> > going to cos

Update Stretch to Buster sources.list file

2019-07-01 Thread Paul Sutton
Hi When updating from Stretch to Buster I know that I need to change references in the sources.list file Mine is below # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.5.0 _Stretch_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20180714-10:25]/ stretch contrib main non-free # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.5.0 _Stretch_ - Offic

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Default User
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 13:51 Brian wrote: > On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 13:24:48 -0400, Default User wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Easy question, maybe hard to answer . . . > > > > Is someone has an existing conventional Unstable setup (nothing exotic in > > hardware or software), what if any special actions

Re: Choice of VMs under i386 Stretch?

2019-07-01 Thread Matthew Crews
On 7/1/19 10:35 AM, Curt wrote: > On 2019-07-01, Matthew Crews wrote: >> >> At a cursory glance, it does NOT appear that DVD-1 contains any VM Host >> software, other than perhaps nspawn (which is part of Systemd). > > Isn't nspawn a chroot container? > Indeed, but depending on the needs, it mi

Re: Choice of VMs under i386 Stretch?

2019-07-01 Thread Linux-Fan
Richard Owlett writes: [...] On 06/30/2019 10:44 AM, Linux-Fan wrote: Matthew Crews writes: On 6/30/19 5:34 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm considering using a VM for some experiments. > Although my web searches have turned up articles about particular > aspects of particular VMs, I've found

Re: Re: Please consider unblocking Chromium and linux packages for Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On 7/1/19, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:13:00PM +0200, Rodrigo Olmos wrote: >> > For security critical packages like web browsers I would always >> > recommend getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security >> > ASAP. >> >> What would be the best procedure as of

Re: How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Brian
On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 13:24:48 -0400, Default User wrote: > Hi. > > Easy question, maybe hard to answer . . . > > Is someone has an existing conventional Unstable setup (nothing exotic in > hardware or software), what if any special actions should be taken before, > during, or after the impendin

Re: Choice of VMs under i386 Stretch?

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Matthew Crews wrote: > > At a cursory glance, it does NOT appear that DVD-1 contains any VM Host > software, other than perhaps nspawn (which is part of Systemd). Isn't nspawn a chroot container? > Hope this helps. >

How Buster release may affect Unstable?

2019-07-01 Thread Default User
Hi. Easy question, maybe hard to answer . . . Is someone has an existing conventional Unstable setup (nothing exotic in hardware or software), what if any special actions should be taken before, during, or after the impending release of the new Stable? (inb4: 1 - RTFM 2 - RTF release notes)

Re: Choice of VMs under i386 Stretch?

2019-07-01 Thread Matthew Crews
On 6/30/19 12:12 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 06/30/2019 10:44 AM, Linux-Fan wrote: >> Matthew Crews writes: >>> Are you asking what virtual machine hosts are available on Debian? > > *explicitly* So clearly I struck a nerve, and I apologize. The way you asked your question was somewhat unclear

Re: Debian Perl or Brew Perl for production application?

2019-07-01 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
I have worked in a couple places that prefer ActiveState perl. https://www.activestate.com/products/activeperl/ On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 11:37 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Didar, > > Quoting Didar Hossain (2019-07-01 18:22:18) > > I am developing a perl application to be deployed on a production

Re: Debian Perl or Brew Perl for production application?

2019-07-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Didar, Quoting Didar Hossain (2019-07-01 18:22:18) > I am developing a perl application to be deployed on a production > Debian Stable VM. So far, my approach has been to use the debian perl > packages (perl modules) and stay within those facilities. I am the > sole system operator and wanna

Re: Debian Buster RC 2 wont start GUI on a Radeon HD 5750

2019-07-01 Thread aprekates
Is that sth that can be corrected , or is happening due to legal issues ? But in the installer there is the option to use non-free packages. So shouldnt that be reported as an issue? Alexandros On 1/7/19 1:41 μ.μ., basti wrote: Hello, you need: firmware-amd-graphics *and* firmware-linux-nonfr

Re: Debian Perl or Brew Perl for production application?

2019-07-01 Thread tomas
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:52:18PM +0530, Didar Hossain wrote: > Hi, > > I am developing a perl application to be deployed on a production Debian > Stable > VM. So far, my approach has been to use the debian perl packages (perl > modules) and > stay within those facilities. I am the sole system

Debian Perl or Brew Perl for production application?

2019-07-01 Thread Didar Hossain
Hi, I am developing a perl application to be deployed on a production Debian Stable VM. So far, my approach has been to use the debian perl packages (perl modules) and stay within those facilities. I am the sole system operator and wannabe developer, there are no teams of sysadmins or developers.

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> > >> > For whatever it's worth, when I upgraded this machine from stretch to >> > buster a couple months ago, it continued using eth0 as the interface >> > name without any immediately obvious issues. I did the conversion to >> > "predictable interface names

[fixed] Re: Numeric keypad not working on Gnome lock screen

2019-07-01 Thread Steven Post
(Please keep me in CC, as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list) On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 14:56 +0200, Steven Post wrote: > On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 22:15 +0200, Steven Post wrote: > > (Please keep me in CC, as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list) > > > > On Sun, 2019-06-23 at 19:16 +0300, andreimp

Re: [OT] USB stick failure is bizarre

2019-07-01 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:36:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > I have an 8GB USB stick that seems to have suffered a "brain > transplant" and I wondered if the symptoms are as bizarre as > they seem. When inserted, udev fills out the usual symlinks > for by-id and by-path, but any att

Re: Fwd: alternative Firmware for BMC's

2019-07-01 Thread Dan Ritter
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I don't know how many people are aware of what the BMC is / does -- after a > little googling, my tentative understanding is that this is the "extra" > miroprocessor that is now included in some (Intel and maybe AMD?) CPUs? > > What are you trying to do with it? > >

Re: OT:hardware query

2019-07-01 Thread Dan Ritter
mick crane wrote: > On 2019-07-01 11:05, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > Would seem that a processor without integrated graphics might be > > > better ? > > > > It's irrelevant: hardly any Steam games will play acceptably > > using integrated graphics. > > what I meant was not much point having integ

Re: Fwd: alternative Firmware for BMC's

2019-07-01 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > short question: when I read [1] (sorry just in german), it says that several > vendors install their own BMC software up there. So I ask myself which one? I guess you will have to find a place where big iron is more on topic. For us small iron owners there is still AMT if we want it scary:

Re: apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread David Wright
On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 13:45:30 (+), Fabian peter Hammerle wrote: > > Presumably by employing the same method that linux-image uses: > > by moving/copying the version number into the packages' names, > > foo-1 and foo-2. > > Thanks for your suggestion > > We are using CI/CD pipelines that depl

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:15:50PM -, Curt wrote: > On 2019-07-01, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:47:35AM -, Curt wrote: > >> Another, less serious, gotcha for those inveterate upgraders and newbies > >> who don't read the release notes is that > >> '/etc/udev/rules.d/

Re: Re: Please consider unblocking Chromium and linux packages for Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:13:00PM +0200, Rodrigo Olmos wrote: > > For security critical packages like web browsers I would always recommend > > getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security ASAP. > > What would be the best procedure as of today to have v75 instead of > v73 on str

[OT] USB stick failure is bizarre

2019-07-01 Thread David Wright
I have an 8GB USB stick that seems to have suffered a "brain transplant" and I wondered if the symptoms are as bizarre as they seem. When inserted, udev fills out the usual symlinks for by-id and by-path, but any attempt to use the stick results in "No medium found". The output from /run/udev/data

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:47:35AM -, Curt wrote: >> Another, less serious, gotcha for those inveterate upgraders and newbies >> who don't read the release notes is that >> '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' is no longer a valid >> mechanism for d

Re: Fwd: alternative Firmware for BMC's

2019-07-01 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:48:50AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I don't know how many people are aware of what the BMC is / does -- after a > little googling, my tentative understanding is that this is the "extra" > miroprocessor that is now included in some (Intel and maybe AM

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:47:35AM -, Curt wrote: > Another, less serious, gotcha for those inveterate upgraders and newbies > who don't read the release notes is that > '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' is no longer a valid > mechanism for defining device names. For whatever it's wo

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:14:07PM -, Curt wrote: >>The second triad of NUMBER % RANK columns corresponds to the number of people >>using the package regularly* and by that metric ecryptfs-utils beats encfs by >>a >>relative long shot (1066 to 630, 0.5

Re: Fwd: alternative Firmware for BMC's

2019-07-01 Thread rhkramer
I don't know how many people are aware of what the BMC is / does -- after a little googling, my tentative understanding is that this is the "extra" miroprocessor that is now included in some (Intel and maybe AMD?) CPUs? What are you trying to do with it? If you're setting up a computer that hap

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:14:07PM -, Curt wrote: The second triad of NUMBER % RANK columns corresponds to the number of people using the package regularly* and by that metric ecryptfs-utils beats encfs by a relative long shot (1066 to 630, 0.58% to 0.34%). "relative" to what? That's what t

AW: apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread Fabian peter Hammerle
Hi David, > Presumably by employing the same method that linux-image uses: > by moving/copying the version number into the packages' names, > foo-1 and foo-2. Thanks for your suggestion We are using CI/CD pipelines that deploy multiple versions / debian packages per day. So appending version s

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 08:33:35AM -0500, David Wright wrote: The grey area is for me is the relative benefit of encrypting file by file compared with the whole partition. Assuming that there's just one passphrase involved in each scenario, is more protection given by the former method? After all

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread David Wright
On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 06:05:52 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > >At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug. That last is going > > > to cost too many that can't ignore

Re: apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread David Wright
On Mon 01 Jul 2019 at 07:32:20 (+), Fabian peter Hammerle wrote: > I set up an APT repository containing 2 packages: foo and bar > > The repository contains 2 versions of foo: 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 > and 2 versions of bar: 3.0.0 and 4.0.0 > > foo 1.0.0 depends on bar 3.0.0 > foo 2.0.0 depends on ba

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-07-01, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug. That last is going >> > to cost too many that can't ignore it and don't have unencr

Re: Update Two Problems

2019-07-01 Thread Stephen P. Molnar
On 07/01/2019 08:31 AM, Sven Hartge wrote: Stephen P. Molnar wrote: More serious. however is the other error: [Connecting to prod.debian.map.fastly.net (2a04:4e42:3e::204)] Your system thinks to have IPv6 connectivity while it has not. Find out why this is the case and you solve this prob

Re: Replacing nvidia card, with Amd - can no longer boot.

2019-07-01 Thread Sarunas Burdulis
On 6/30/19 2:09 PM, Esteban L wrote: > ... > What I don't know is how to solve this issue had the nvidia card failed > :-( i couldn't do much of anything. Try booting from some live Linux media (CD, USB), with AMD card installed. chroot to your system and do the same uninstall "trick". -- Sarun

Re: Update Two Problems

2019-07-01 Thread Sven Hartge
Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > More serious. however is the other error: > [Connecting to prod.debian.map.fastly.net (2a04:4e42:3e::204)] Your system thinks to have IPv6 connectivity while it has not. Find out why this is the case and you solve this problem. A different (unelegant) workaround wou

Update Two Problems

2019-07-01 Thread Stephen P. Molnar
I found it necessary to reinstall Debian Stretch on my primary computer and encountered two problems. The first problem was that the installer failed to verify updates at the uchicago mirror and commented out the applicable lines in the fstab. I can live with that as I use the v-9-9-0 is fr t

Re: Debian Buster RC 2 wont start GUI on a Radeon HD 5750

2019-07-01 Thread basti
Hello, you need: firmware-amd-graphics *and* firmware-linux-nonfree I had a similar Problem last week. Best Regards, On 01.07.19 12:19, aprekates wrote: > I used the installer with the firmware included. > > I had to search it for an hour and the package > that was needed is: firmware-linux-no

Re: OT:hardware query

2019-07-01 Thread mick crane
On 2019-07-01 11:05, Dan Ritter wrote: Would seem that a processor without integrated graphics might be better ? It's irrelevant: hardly any Steam games will play acceptably using integrated graphics. what I meant was not much point having integrated graphics as chip without integrated grap

Re: Re: Please consider unblocking Chromium and linux packages for Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Rodrigo Olmos
> For security critical packages like web browsers I would always recommend > getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security ASAP. What would be the best procedure as of today to have v75 instead of v73 on stretch? I tried pinning v75 from unstable but it suggests huge changes (91

Debian Buster RC 2 wont start GUI on a Radeon HD 5750

2019-07-01 Thread aprekates
I used the installer with the firmware included. I had to search it for an hour and the package that was needed is: firmware-linux-nonfree Alexandros

AW: apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread Fabian peter Hammerle
Hi Tomás, Thank you very much for suggesting `--allow-downgrades` and your additional explanations. Unfortunately, I get the same error as before: ``` $ sudo apt-get install --allow-downgrades foo=1.0.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Do

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 July 2019 03:52:55 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > >At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug. That last is going > > to cost too many that can't ignore it and don't have unencrypted > > backups. Thats going to be a lot

Re: OT:hardware query

2019-07-01 Thread Dan Ritter
mick crane wrote: > On 2019-06-29 17:17, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Martin Smith wrote: > > > On 28/06/2019 17:11, mick crane wrote: > > General advice: > > > > - look for a generic PC, avoiding laptops and anything described > > as "mini". > > > > - Don't obsess over CPUs. The last 8 years have on

Re: apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread tomas
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:32:20AM +, Fabian peter Hammerle wrote: > Dear Debian Users, > > I set up an APT repository containing 2 packages: foo and bar > > The repository contains 2 versions of foo: 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 > and 2 versions of bar: 3.0.0 and 4.0.0 [...] > I get the same result whe

Fwd: alternative Firmware for BMC's

2019-07-01 Thread Stefan K
Hello everybody, So I don't get any answers from the debian-user-german mailinglist I ask you ;) short question: when I read [1] (sorry just in german), it says that several vendors install their own BMC software up there. So I ask myself which one? OpenBMC doesn't really seem to work yet and I

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: At this point, I'd call it a buster delaying bug. That last is going to cost too many that can't ignore it and don't have unencrypted backups. Thats going to be a lot of very bad PR. It's the release teams call, generally speaking,

Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster

2019-07-01 Thread Curt
On 2019-06-30, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 30/06/19 11:52, Curt ha scritto: > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928956 >> >> Due to #765854 ecryptfs-utils has been removed from Buster. >> The kernel module (ecryptfs.ko) is still built but depending on the >> upgrade path us

apt-get install refuses to installs older versions of dependencies

2019-07-01 Thread Fabian peter Hammerle
Dear Debian Users, I set up an APT repository containing 2 packages: foo and bar The repository contains 2 versions of foo: 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 and 2 versions of bar: 3.0.0 and 4.0.0 foo 1.0.0 depends on bar 3.0.0 foo 2.0.0 depends on bar 4.0.0 I can easily install the latest version of foo via ```