On 3/25/2019 5:38 AM, mick crane wrote:
> Is there any text editor, preferably in a terminal that has the facility
> to protect lines in the document, not the document itself ?
> I've got 2 blocks of "code" that look similar and I keep editing the
> wrong one and then it doesn't work.
Not strictly
Martin McCormick wrote:
> deloptes writes:
>> I just wonder why one would do that, but it is again your business.
>
> In all but a very small handful of countries around the
> world, the hobby of amateur radio exists and it's justification
> for existence is to allow people to self-train as to h
t...@t8w.de wrote:
> due to a graphics card change in a few days, which will allow me to
> properly use virtualization, I wanted to check a few things. First check,
> starting the pc without the current dedicated graphics card, failed really
> unexpectedly, because the integrated graphics card of
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 9:38 PM mick crane wrote:
> Is there any text editor, preferably in a terminal that has the facility
> to protect lines in the document, not the document itself ?
> I've got 2 blocks of "code" that look similar and I keep editing the
> wrong one and then it doesn't work.
>
On 25.03.19 04:38, mick crane wrote:
> Is there any text editor, preferably in a terminal that has the facility to
> protect lines in the document, not the document itself ?
> I've got 2 blocks of "code" that look similar and I keep editing the wrong
> one and then it doesn't work.
The only thing
Even if it's not possible to colorize that block, hash marks could be
used on beginnings of lines to make those lines comments. Then save the
document. Then grep -v "^#" file >file2
That should remove your protected block from the saved file. Now, edit
file2. When finished, go into the original
On 3/25/19, mick crane wrote:
> Is there any text editor, preferably in a terminal that has the facility
> to protect lines in the document, not the document itself ?
> I've got 2 blocks of "code" that look similar and I keep editing the
> wrong one and then it doesn't work.
I don't know of that
Is there any text editor, preferably in a terminal that has the facility
to protect lines in the document, not the document itself ?
I've got 2 blocks of "code" that look similar and I keep editing the
wrong one and then it doesn't work.
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:53:10 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 20 Mar 2019 at 18:21:20 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:00:12 -0400 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 02:10:57 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > > Actually I don't call youtube-dl as above, be
deloptes writes:
> I just wonder why one would do that, but it is again your business.
In all but a very small handful of countries around the
world, the hobby of amateur radio exists and it's justification
for existence is to allow people to self-train as to how
electronic communication
Hey,
due to a graphics card change in a few days, which will allow me to properly use
virtualization, I wanted to check a few things. First check, starting the pc
without
the current dedicated graphics card, failed really unexpectedly, because the
integrated graphics card of my intel processor wa
On 24/03/19, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
> Hi. I'm stuck in the DC and it's getting cold!
>
> I'm trying to install debian-9.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso using the
> non-graphical installer. All is fine till I hit the 'configure apt'
> stage, when it simply hangs at 'scanning the
Hi. I'm stuck in the DC and it's getting cold!
I'm trying to install debian-9.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso using the
non-graphical installer. All is fine till I hit the 'configure apt'
stage, when it simply hangs at 'scanning the mirror'.
I can still ping the network. I've tried three different mirrors.
Mimiko wrote:
> I came across a problem when booting. In the server is installed 4
> disks connected to raid controller and 2 disks connected to
> motherboard sata interfaces. During booting disks connected to raid
> controller are detected before md raid assembling process, while the 2
> disks c
Martin McCormick wrote:
> Apparently, the flush after each new cycle of data isn't
> taxing the system too much as the output looks correct. This is
> a 600 MHZ Pentium which would have gone in to the recycle bin
> years ago if not for Linux. Older systems like this tend to
> accentuate the effe
info writes:
> Why can I not fint "en_DK.UTF-8 UTF-8" when I install a normal os from
> you (it is not a server version)??
>
> I know that I can set it after the installation, but it is not the same!!
You have to generate all locales you want to use. Run
dpkg-reconfigure locales
and
hello.
I came across a problem when booting. In the server is installed 4 disks connected to raid controller and 2 disks connected to motherboard sata
interfaces. During booting disks connected to raid controller are detected before md raid assembling process, while the 2 disks connected to
mot
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:50PM -0600, ghe wrote:
But when I'm looking to connect a cable, the location of the port on the
outside of the box is much more useful to me than the address number on
the bus.
Unfortunately, the software doesn't know what was written on the outside
of the box.
On Sunday 24 March 2019 14:25:47 Martin McCormick wrote:
> David Wright writes:
> > On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 18:23:47 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:27:01AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 17:45:50 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > >
>
David Wright writes:
> On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 18:23:47 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:27:01AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 17:45:50 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > Reading the OP's problem, I wonder how you're meant to detect
> >
On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 17:40:43 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. März 2019, 17:15:29 CET schrieb Reco:
> > No, this is done by udev. It can be disabled, it can be configured, and
> > it can be left as is.
> >
> I know, that the old style can be kept by either using udev (withg persistent-
>
On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 23:29:07 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2019-03-23 23:03 (UTC-0400):
>
> > On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 04:39:21 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> The ATX is on the left when looking at the rear from the rear with
> >> the slot openings facing up. ghe wante
On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 18:23:47 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:27:01AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 17:45:50 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Reading the OP's problem, I wonder how you're meant to detect
> > "any whiff of a problem" [...]
On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 20:14:18 (+0100), Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, David Wright wrote:
>
> > almost invariably up-to-date enough, and I don't have to check
> > for upgradesthey just appear, like mainstream updates.
>
> what do you mean by "enough" ?
Because it downloads all
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:34:42 +0100 (CET)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, riveravaldez wrote:
Maybe worth mentioning: youtube-dl, exceptionally useful and simple CLI tool.
useful and simple... but it works only for urls with alphanumeric c
On 3/24/19, Hans wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. März 2019, 10:56:10 CET schrieb Reco:
>> Hi.
>>
> Hi,
>> > Ok, a new question: But, if I want someone give the opportunity, to go
>> > to
>> > the web with tor and I want to let him use my computer as a proxy, then
>> > he may use my privoxy on port 8
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2019, 10:56:10 CET schrieb Reco:
> Hi.
>
Hi,
> > Ok, a new question: But, if I want someone give the opportunity, to go to
> > the web with tor and I want to let him use my computer as a proxy, then
> > he may use my privoxy on port 8118 and can use it?
>
> As long as y
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:44:39AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. März 2019, 10:19:59 CET schrieb Reco:
> > Hi.
> >
>
> Hi Reco,
>
> thanks for the fast response. Most of this I understood.
>
> > If you need to use Tor and you have a browser which supports SOCKS proxy
>
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2019, 10:19:59 CET schrieb Reco:
> Hi.
>
Hi Reco,
thanks for the fast response. Most of this I understood.
> If you need to use Tor and you have a browser which supports SOCKS proxy
> - then you need to use only Tor. Privoxy is redundant here.
Did I understand you c
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:10:22AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I want to use privoxy with tor. Reading the documentation of privoxy let me
> confuse. As the documentation is telling, the browser shall use 127.0.0.1 and
> port
> 8118 as proxy for http and ssl,
That's Privox
Hi folks,
I want to use privoxy with tor. Reading the documentation of privoxy let me
confuse. As the documentation is telling, the browser shall use 127.0.0.1 and
port
8118 as proxy for http and ssl, the docu also is telling, that port 9050 (or
9150) by
using tor shall also work.
In my con
deloptes composed on 2019-03-24 07:21 (UTC+0100):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Time can't change motherboard components' relative physical positions.
> this is true, but to conclude that the numbering of the ethernet devices
> depends on the position of the ATX or whatever is a bit too much.
Keyword
32 matches
Mail list logo
