Dear Sir/Madam
First thanks for your time.
I have an Acer laptop (Aspire E1, x64, amd i7, ram 16, vga 2).
My base tasks are using virtual machines.
I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of Bios boot is “Legacy”.
I gonna change my HDD to SSD & install just Debian 9.8 (so need at lea
On 3/10/19 3:53 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 13:18:54 -0400, deb wrote:
Crumogeon tip: It is no longer 1972. If you have nothing nice or at least
helpful to say on a USER list, say nothing at all.
All the responses were helpful. You just have to fit them into your
World View and
> OP has a point though. The real world happens to have a huge amount of
> heterogeneous networks, and asking for tools to keep those systems safe
> is legitimate.
I did not perceive the OP's request to be about the case where you
administer lots of machines and you want to use a Debian machine as
On Mon 11 Mar 2019 at 20:30:55 +0100, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion it
Citation, please.
[Snip]
> What do you think about this ?
Nothing to do with Debian.
--
Brian.
Curt wrote:
> I don't believe he did, actually. I believe that's what Reco wrote.
but there is no secure OS, as soon as you get connected to the network, and
if you have a server with multiple users ... well. We used to put sensitive
servers in DMZ aside of the user network - for a good reason.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:30:55 +0100
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion
> it is not so easy to state it. Of course current cloud offer of MS
> Office for $12 per month would means one tryllion a year if 7 billion
> people would
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time vulnerability
>> itself...
>> Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
>
> My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under no
> delusion in this respect). Just that instead of kee
Hello,
Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion it
is not so easy to state it. Of course current cloud offer of MS Office
for $12 per month would means one tryllion a year if 7 billion people
would subscribe. That would be insane. But in fact if 100 million would
subscr
On 03/11/2019 03:45 PM, Brian wrote:
NULL set
On Mon 11 Mar 2019 at 13:48:04 -0400, deb wrote:
>
> re: Canonical being a great company as postured by one here:
>
>
> * They have already been caught selling search results to Amazon.
>
> * the board let go ALL non-corporate members - the People's voice.
>
> * they sleep with Microsof
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:59:25 -0400
deb wrote:
> On 3/11/19 2:47 PM, Joe wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
> > deb wrote:
> >
> >> I saw this question come up
> >>
> >> and it set off bells.
> >>
> >>
> >> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
> >>
> >> That i
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 14:13 -0400, deb wrote:
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
>
>
> *MY* Assumptions:
>
> * MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4 format
On 11.03.2019 23:13, deb wrote:
>
>
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
>
>
> *MY* Assumptions:
>
> * MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4 formatted).
>
> * many p
On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 09:21:37 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm running Stretch with MATE desktop.
>
> If I submit a sub-string of a filename to "MATE Search Tool", *ANY*
> hit reports the full path to the target. That is *GOOD*!
>
> HOWEVER, if I'm exploring a specific directory with Caja an
On 3/11/19 2:47 PM, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
deb wrote:
I saw this question come up
and it set off bells.
Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
That it was not yet supported (?) .
I don't think that has been true for several years, though it
> There is a spectrum of Windows software than runs between evil malware
> and legitimate programs, it isn't just black and white, and many
Agreed, but I doubt A/V software will know where to draw the line.
Stefan
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
deb wrote:
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
I don't think that has been true for several years, though it certainly
was at o
On Sat 09 Mar 2019 at 20:31:36 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 08/03/2019 à 04:15, David Wright a écrit :
> > On Thu 07 Mar 2019 at 23:12:29 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > > Le 07/03/2019 à 20:23, David Wright a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > A filesystem
> > > > that has a label, has that labe
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:53:39 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time
> > vulnerability itself...
> > Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
>
> My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under
> no delusion in
I saw this question come up
and it set off bells.
Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
That it was not yet supported (?) .
*MY* Assumptions:
* MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4 formatted).
* many portable 1-5TB drives making the rounds, formatted with
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:45:28 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I think the premises of your syllogism might lead some to another
> > conclusion---that the livelihood of the AV software houses depends
> > upon the innate insecurity of the Windows OS.
>
> Hmm... they don't actually need that: they
Bob Weber writes:
> On 3/10/19 5:20 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Since a recent update, my /var/log/syslog is getting spammed with huge
> numbers of messages of the form
>
> Mar 10 14:02:25 snowball systemd-udevd[18681]: Process '/sbin/mdadm
> --incremental --export /dev/sda3 --offroot
> /dev/d
> re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time vulnerability
> itself...
> Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under no
delusion in this respect). Just that instead of keeping your A/V
up-to-date, the GNU
re: Canonical being a great company as postured by one here:
* They have already been caught selling search results to Amazon.
* the board let go ALL non-corporate members - the People's voice.
* they sleep with Microsoft of E-E-E fame.
* The owner is hell bent on getting to IPO lev
On 3/10/19 1:33 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote:
deb writes:
Starting assumption: I do want to run A/V.
* I get that it may actually INCREASE attack surface.
* But I have Windows & Mac stuff going back and forth to Debian 9.8
and just want to check.
When you say going back and forth, do you
On 3/10/19 5:20 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Since a recent update, my /var/log/syslog is getting spammed with huge
numbers of messages of the form
Mar 10 14:02:25 snowball systemd-udevd[18681]: Process '/sbin/mdadm
--incremental --export /dev/sda3 --offroot
/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3000DM001-1ER166_Z
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희
wrote:
> Dear Brad,
>
> On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > [...snip...]
> >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
> >
> > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.
On 3/10/19, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm running Stretch with MATE desktop.
>
> If I submit a sub-string of a filename to "MATE Search Tool", *ANY* hit
> reports the full path to the target. That is *GOOD*!
>
> HOWEVER, if I'm exploring a specific directory with Caja and then search
> for the *IDEN
> I think the premises of your syllogism might lead some to another
> conclusion---that the livelihood of the AV software houses depends upon
> the innate insecurity of the Windows OS.
Hmm... they don't actually need that: they only need people to
think that they're vulnerable (regardless if their
On 2019-03-11, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
>> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
>> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
>
> This is misleading: all OSes are somewhat
I use clamav along with clamav-unofficial-sigs, Sanesecurity and Securiteinfo
(which I pay for)
Secondly, I use “Bitdefender Security for Mail Servers – Linux”, again which I
pay for.
I use clamav-milter and the bdmilterd to scan mail using clamav and Bit
Defender.
I must say that it was pret
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, 03:45 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Default User wrote:
>
> > I will just have to either ignore the problem and pretend it doesn't
> > exist, or just purge the minissdpd package completely, and hope
> > nothing really needs it. Decisions, decisions . . .
>
> "Nothing really needs it
> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
This is misleading: all OSes are somewhat insecure, in practice.
The question is what
Bonjour,
Nous vous prions de trouver en pièce jointe votre facture.
Nous restons à votre disposition pour tout renseignement complémentaire.
Bien cordialement
Yoann Mallet
Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
N'attendez plus, cela ne prend que quelques secondes !https://omegaenergysyste
On 2019-03-11, Paul Sutton wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2019 15:04, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> deb wrote:
>>
>>> a. What does the group suggest running on debian beyond
>>> - chkrootkit
>> Useless.
>>
>>> - rkhunter
>> Crap, unmaintained.
>>
>> Both tools produce more false positives than finding anyth
On 10/03/2019 15:04, Sven Hartge wrote:
> deb wrote:
>
>> a. What does the group suggest running on debian beyond
>> - chkrootkit
> Useless.
>
>> - rkhunter
> Crap, unmaintained.
>
> Both tools produce more false positives than finding anything, just
> creating a false sense of security
On 2019-03-11, deloptes wrote:
> deb wrote:
I don't believe he did, actually. I believe that's what Reco wrote.
>> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
>> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
>> it's considered wise here to use a
Default User wrote:
> I will just have to either ignore the problem and pretend it doesn't
> exist, or just purge the minissdpd package completely, and hope
> nothing really needs it. Decisions, decisions . . .
"Nothing really needs it." is the answer here. It speeds up some
operations in some c
deb wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
If you have windows users in your network, the best is to pay for a server
deb wrote:
> ClamAV
I recall 15y ago we integrated kasperky into ClamAV. Easy to integrate and
easy to use. Worked great. I left this company couple of years later, but
it will not surprise me if they are still using the same setup.
40 matches
Mail list logo
