Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

On 1/8/19 10:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Jude DaShiell composed on 2019-01-09 00:04 (UTC-0500): lsblk -l -o name,label | sort | script I tried exactly that on Buster multiple times, and always get the following: root@gb250:~# NAME LABEL bash: NAME: command not found root@gb250:~# sda bash: sda

Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

Jude DaShiell composed on 2019-01-09 00:04 (UTC-0500): > lsblk -l -o name,label | sort | script I tried exactly that on Buster multiple times, and always get the following: root@gb250:~# NAME LABEL bash: NAME: command not found root@gb250:~# sda bash: sda: command not found root@gb250:~# sda10

Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

DUH ;/ I was so focused on lsblk demonstrating with its graphical output that it COULD do what I wanted that I didn't think about an external sort, Thank you On 01/08/2019 11:04 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote: lsblk -l -o name,label | sort | script On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Richard Owlett wrote: Date:

Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

lsblk -l -o name,label | sort | script On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Richard Owlett wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:56:39 > From: Richard Owlett > To: debian-user > Subject: Taming the "lsblk" command > Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:57:05 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Wh

Re: kernel regression from stable to testing (acpi lid / EEEpc 1215p)

Hi, On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:44:04 +0100 Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 07/01/19 20:09, Michael Lange ha scritto: > > > > Since the error message looks different from yours I guess that this > > is probably a completely different issue, though. > > Most likely you're right, however there was quite a

Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

Hi. On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:56:39PM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I wish to feed the output of "lsblk -l -o name,label" to a script which > *DEPENDS* on input being in strict alpha-numeric order. > > How? lsblk(8): lsblk -l -x name -o name,label Reco

Taming the "lsblk" command

When I do >lsblk -o name,label I get a nice graphical result in _STRICT_ *ALPHA_NUMERIC* order. However when I do > lsblk -l -o name,label I get > sdc14 good-fvwm > sdc15 tst_mysql > sde > sde1 debian-2-go > sr0 > sdc16 tst_mariadb > sdc17 dummy > sdc18 target I wish to feed the output

Re: OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:57:00 +0100 basti wrote: > > Perhaps I will try this one. > > https://www.sabrent.com/product/BK-PCBS/2-5-ssd-sata-hard-drive-desktop-3-5-sata-bay-converter-mounting-kit/ > > And write some feedback next weeks. > I've just bought a USB drive enclosure from them, which

Re: The Dark Mod on Stretch?

Hi. On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:22:53AM -0500, Boyan Penkov wrote: > Hello, > > Anybody here play http://www.thedarkmod.com/main/ > ? I wish ☹ > have folks been able to get 2.07 to compile on Stretch, under only 64-bit? I could try if you provide me t

Re: OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

basti wrote: > > > On 08.01.19 20:06, Joe wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:29:39 +0100 > > basti wrote: > > > >> Hallo, > >> we have some Fujitsu TX 150 Server with 3,5" HDD and want to install > >> SSD's (2,5"). We are looking for an adapter usable for HDD Caddy > >> FSC A3C40056861 or A3C400

Re: OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

On 08.01.19 20:06, Joe wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:29:39 +0100 > basti wrote: > >> Hallo, >> we have some Fujitsu TX 150 Server with 3,5" HDD and want to install >> SSD's (2,5"). We are looking for an adapter usable for HDD Caddy >> FSC A3C40056861 or A3C40032808. >> >> All I have found is

Re: /dev/disk/by-id/ in testing

Le 08/01/2019 à 12:51, Johan en Katrien Dewaele a écrit : Only the location of my boot-disk is identified by "ID" in lilo, seems it is not possible to do this by UUID in lilo. I wrote previously in this thread : This is because the UUID is only part of filesystem metadata and cannot be used

Re: OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:29:39 +0100 basti wrote: > Hallo, > we have some Fujitsu TX 150 Server with 3,5" HDD and want to install > SSD's (2,5"). We are looking for an adapter usable for HDD Caddy > FSC A3C40056861 or A3C40032808. > > All I have found is an Howto to glue the SSD into the A3C4005686

Re: OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

basti wrote: > Hallo, > we have some Fujitsu TX 150 Server with 3,5" HDD and want to install > SSD's (2,5"). We are looking for an adapter usable for HDD Caddy > FSC A3C40056861 or A3C40032808. > > All I have found is an Howto to glue the SSD into the A3C40056861 but I > think it's not an good id

Re: /dev/disk/by-id/ in testing

Johan en Katrien Dewaele wrote: > Thinking of switching to grub2 to avoid these problems. > good thinking

OT: HDD Adapter for fujitsu Server 2,5" to 3,5"

Hallo, we have some Fujitsu TX 150 Server with 3,5" HDD and want to install SSD's (2,5"). We are looking for an adapter usable for HDD Caddy FSC A3C40056861 or A3C40032808. All I have found is an Howto to glue the SSD into the A3C40056861 but I think it's not an good idea if I must change the SSD

Re: kernel regression from stable to testing (acpi lid / EEEpc 1215p)

Il 07/01/19 20:09, Michael Lange ha scritto: Since the error message looks different from yours I guess that this is probably a completely different issue, though. Most likely you're right, however there was quite a big rewrite of ACPI in 4.10 and I wouldn't rule it out completely. I bel

Re: Upgrade Problem

On 2019-01-07 02:56, John Crawley wrote: On 06/01/2019 00.26, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, January 04, 2019 08:21:30 PM David Wright wrote: On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 14:02:27 (-0500), Stephen P. Molnar wrote: Having babbled for the last two paragraphs, I'll close buy saying that I will

The Dark Mod on Stretch?

Hello, Anybody here play http://www.thedarkmod.com/main/ ? have folks been able to get 2.07 to compile on Stretch, under only 64-bit? Cheers! -- Boyan Penkov www.boyanpenkov.com

Re: Why choose Debian on server

On 2019-01-05, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I think the question about is it on purpose on the part of stackexchange In researching this bug, I recently discovered bugzilla.mozilla.org itself triggers the bug. Just drumming up business, as it were, I guess. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi