Indeed some are virtual or pure virtual (although i dont know the diff)
But also there are packages like 'ergo' which look normal
and the only relation i think found (reason to display it) is because
libstd++6 depends on it.
Also listed packages like 'wink' not in the repos any more.
On 22/12/
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200
aprekates wrote:
> In my case both:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> and
>
> $ dpkg -l 'w*'
>
> will report the same list
>
Hi!
I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are
packages, dpkg knows about providing some virtual packages,
that something
In my case both:
$ dpkg -l w*
and
$ dpkg -l 'w*'
will report the same list
# dpkg -l w*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
> >
> > $ dpkg -l
> >
> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
> >
> > But if i run:
> >
> > $ dpkg -l w*
> >
> > i will get a dozen also of
On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
>
> $ dpkg -l
>
> will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
>
> But if i run:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
>
> So i dont understand the logic of
In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
$ dpkg -l
will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
But if i run:
$ dpkg -l w*
i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
So i dont understand the logic of altering the output when
i use a pattern . I would expect to see only 'ii'
On 12/21/2018 10:35 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Stefan,
Am 2018-12-20 hackte Stefan Monnier in die Tasten:
It's too easy to click it by mistake.
I want to turn off not just the misfeature but also the popup.
I found after a long search in a bunch of forum articles and in
bugzilla (YES,
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> ~/.cache/mozilla//cache2/entries/
>
> 26 GByte in 186.713 files!
>
> I have 18 profiles and the whole
> ~/.cache/mozilla/
> has currently 38GByte in total.
Cool - so you suffer multiple personality disorder :) ... 18 of them
I found only two here and size is 1.1
Than
On 12/16/18, Long Wind wrote:
> On Sunday, December 16, 2018 7:07 PM, Eike Lantzsch
> wrote:
>
> Usually I don't reply AOL but in this case I second that.
> I'm an unhappy Firefox-user on Debian and am looking for alternatives.
> Yes, I do have many tabs open, 'cause I need them. I got plenty
Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: deloptes
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>> I have no .mozilla file.
>> But the Diskspace is realy 26 GByte.
> it is not a file - it is directory and how do you know it is 26GB -
~/.cache/mozilla//cache2/entries/
26 GByte in 186.713 files!
I have 18 profiles and
Hello Stefan,
Am 2018-12-20 hackte Stefan Monnier in die Tasten:
>
> It's too easy to click it by mistake.
> I want to turn off not just the misfeature but also the popup.
I found after a long search in a bunch of forum articles and in
bugzilla (YES, it is a very well known bug!)
about:config :
> [...]
So, this is not an Ubuntu mailing list, right?
>[quote] Ubuntu Forums has a strict zero-tolerance policy when it comes
>to
>posting dangerous commands.
Oh... Aren't that the people who have
$ sudo chmod 777 /etc/passwd; gedit /etc/passwd
all over their Wiki :D?
-nik
12 matches
Mail list logo
