-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:52:55PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
[...]
> Running a browser as root? Same as above, but worse.
Well, the cryptocurrency miner might have the chance to run
faster then ;-)
Cheers
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
Hi all,
I recently started using the Include directive in my .ssh/config file -
so all the definitions are now in .ssh/config.d/.
Now bash completion of hostnames no longer works. Is this expected
behaviour? Anyone know how to fix it, without reverting to a single file?
I couldn't work out how t
On 14/05/18 07:44, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 05/13/2018 09:09 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:18:26AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>> The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning
>>> sudo &/or /
On Sun 13 May 2018 at 14:44:14 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 05/13/2018 09:09 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:18:26AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>The underlying problem is not understanding what I read conc
On Sun 13 May 2018 at 19:08:48 (+0200), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 13/05/2018 à 17:18, David Wright a écrit :
> >On Fri 11 May 2018 at 15:13:04 (-0500), Kent West wrote:
> >>
> >>That's good to know. I guess my source material (
> >>https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/01/25/uefi-boot-how-does-that-
On Sun 13 May 2018 at 08:18:26 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning sudo &/or
> /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
>
> Only *ONE* individual has physical access to my _personal_ machine.
Not an unusual view. Generally advanced by pe
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> The bad log has two suspicious lines before that range:
> [6.997775] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=abcd, idProduct=1234
> [7.000181] usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
> SerialNumber=3
> Looks much like phony default values.
> They are
Have any spam filters attempted to use neural networks? How well did
that work out?
Nicolas George:
> Gregory Seidman (2018-05-13):
>> Spamassassin has a Bayesian classifier (a standard AI technique) in
>> addition to its rules-base classification.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. But as I explained,
Gregory Seidman (2018-05-13):
> Spamassassin has a Bayesian classifier (a standard AI technique) in
> addition to its rules-base classification.
Thanks for the pointer. But as I explained, I already use bogofilter,
which is already a Bayesian filter (and IIRC much lighter than
Spamassassin). But B
Spamassassin has a Bayesian classifier (a standard AI technique) in
addition to its rules-base classification. You train it on positive (spam)
and negative (non-spam) messages. I've been using it for at least a decade
and I've been very happy with its increasing accuracy as I retrain it on
correct
On 05/13/2018 09:26 AM, bw wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
The result I wish to achieve is to click on the icon for either GParted or
Synaptic *WITHOUT* being asked for a password (either root's or user's).
I've found vague hints that adding a line to my local /etc/sudoers
On 05/13/2018 09:09 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:18:26AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning
sudo &/or /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
Only *ONE* individual
On 05/13/2018 09:12 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 13/05/2018 18:48, Richard Owlett wrote:
The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning
sudo &/or /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
Only *ONE* individual has physical access to my _personal_ machine.
Therefore, a
Hi,
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> (full files sent off-list)
Received.
> Hmm. The bad log has
>
> [7.015708] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas
> [ 25.552030] random: crng init done
It is quite sparse from that point on:
[ 29.034207] usb 1-2: reset high-speed USB device number 2
Le 13/05/2018 à 17:18, David Wright a écrit :
On Fri 11 May 2018 at 15:13:04 (-0500), Kent West wrote:
That's good to know. I guess my source material (
https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/01/25/uefi-boot-how-does-that-actually-work-then/)
is wrong. Or I misunderstood it.
While a lot of the de
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > I have a copy of kern.log from the first (successful) boot, and I have
> > the dmesg output from the second (failed) boot. If anyone wants to look
> > at them, let me know.
>
> I am interested. Especially whether there are messages from the ISO 966
On Fri 11 May 2018 at 15:13:04 (-0500), Kent West wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Pascal Hambourg
> wrote:
>
> > Le 11/05/2018 à 20:33, Kent West a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> I learned that EFI boot drives need to have a GPT partition table. On a
> >>
> >
> > This is not correct. The UEFI sp
On Sun, 13 May 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> The result I wish to achieve is to click on the icon for either GParted or
> Synaptic *WITHOUT* being asked for a password (either root's or user's).
>
> I've found vague hints that adding a line to my local /etc/sudoers file
> such as
> richar
Le 11/05/2018 à 13:34, Niclas Arndt a écrit :
At boot, I was prompted with a BIOS message saying that there was no boot
device.
No, a BIOS upgrade doesn't modify fstab. I believe that EFI has anti-tampering
mechanisms that might have been triggered by the BIOS upgrade. (At least it's
currentl
On 13/05/2018 18:48, Richard Owlett wrote:
The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning sudo
&/or /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
Only *ONE* individual has physical access to my _personal_ machine.
Therefore, any distinction between 'richard' and 'root' is inherently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:18:26AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning
> sudo &/or /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
>
> Only *ONE* individual has physical access to my _personal_ machi
The underlying problem is not understanding what I read concerning sudo
&/or /etc/sudoers (*INCLUDING* man pages).
Only *ONE* individual has physical access to my _personal_ machine.
Therefore, any distinction between 'richard' and 'root' is inherently
artificial.
The result I wish to achieve
Hi,
i wrote:
> > The messages quoted by Kent could well indicate that the "CD-ROM" was
> > found
Curt wrote:
> I was laboring under another erroneous impression for some reason, but
> looking back at the OP he did say that the installer complained about
> not being able to "read" the cdrom (not t
On 2018-05-13, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Curt wrote:
>> I've mounted usb sticks that spontaneously 'umounted' themselves while
>> producing similar I/O reset errors.
>> Which might conceivably explain why the installer would begin asking for
>> the cdrom;
>
> The messages quoted by Kent could wel
Hi.
For years I have been using bogofilter as my main spam filter. But
nowadays, neural networks and machine learning have made enormous
progress.
I wonder if there is somewhere in Debian a spam filter (working on the
same principles as bogofilter: a stand-alone program that reads a mail
from its
Hi,
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -110
If we assume that 110 is a Linux errno, then this would be
ETIMEDOUT 110 /* Connection timed out */
> usb 1-2: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
That's what my USB attached DVD drives somet
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> I have never seen a hard disk or flash drive with a sector size of 2048
> (only 512 or 4096) so the kernel must be correct and the Apple partition
> table must be wrong.
Both are correct. The kernel reports what it perceives as hardware block
size ("physical"). The Ap
On 2018-05-13, Mike Kupfer wrote:
>
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> ...
> usb 1-2: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
>
> I tried booting from a different USB port; that worked once, but on a
> subsequent attempt it failed with the same issue.
>
I've moun
Le 12/05/2018 à 21:38, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Why then does parted complain about a block size discrepancy ?
Because the Apple Partition Map announces to count blocks with size 2048
whereas the Linux device file announces 512 (via ioctl(BLKSSZGET) ?)).
I already kno
29 matches
Mail list logo
