On Thu 26 Apr 2018 at 15:43:32 (-0400), Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:02:38PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> > Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> > > Happy to read the man page to you buddy.
> > >
> > >
> > > -H
> >
> > while I can understand your feeling quite well, I had to teach
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:45:23 + Kenneth Parker
wrote:
> With the help of a "minimal" Debian 8 System, I am learning SystemD.
> My guess was, simply due to more "Moving Parts", than the prior Boot
> Process. More Open Processes, mean, practically more Memory Usage.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kenneth Par
deloptes writes:
> its better you give example in such case
>
> debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file:///DVD1
>
> this is how I understand it, correct if I'm wrong
Almost: as has been stated elsewhere in this thread, at least according
to Appendix D of the Debian I
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:02:38PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> > Happy to read the man page to you buddy.
> >
> >
> > -H
>
> while I can understand your feeling quite well, I had to teach myself either
> to ignore affecting questions or to answer for the sake of the ans
Henning Follmann wrote:
> Happy to read the man page to you buddy.
>
>
> -H
while I can understand your feeling quite well, I had to teach myself either
to ignore affecting questions or to answer for the sake of the answer.
sometimes it is really frustrating how one can not understand obvious
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 07:53:54AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 26, 2018 01:29:17 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:05:41PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > > Yes, the message came from tomas, but the email you received came from
> > > the list serv
With the help of a "minimal" Debian 8 System, I am learning SystemD. My
guess was, simply due to more "Moving Parts", than the prior Boot Process.
More Open Processes, mean, practically more Memory Usage.
Thanks!
Kenneth Parker
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 11:18 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Thu 26 Ap
On Thu 26 Apr 2018 at 15:01:38 (+), Kenneth Parker wrote:
> Couldn't be SystemD, could it? That wasn't in use, in Debian 7.
>
> Just a guess...
>
> Kenneth Parker
That's probably about as useful as saying "What do you expect?
You've moved from 32-bit to 64-bit, so double your memory."
> O
On Thu 26 Apr 2018 at 08:41:17 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:11:44PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > That's right, mbox uses this one as marker. That's why a "naked" From at
> > the beginning of a line, like this one:
> >
> > From there and where
> >
> > gets "esca
Thank you!
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 08:41:17 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This piece of information (to whom errors should be sent) is called
--< good stuff snipped >--
Couldn't be SystemD, could it? That wasn't in use, in Debian 7.
Just a guess...
Kenneth Parker
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 9:09 AM Simon Beirnaert <
simon.beirna...@lightspeedhq.com> wrote:
> Hi Recently I've started moving a fleet of Debian 7, 32-bit machines
> over to Debian 9, 64-bit. This migra
I'm not sure that a ratio of 512MB swap to 1.8GB RAM really proves
anything. If the swap space matched RAM in size and still filled up, I
think that would be more definitive. The bottom-line is that you need
to determine what's consuming it. Also note this comment at the top of
the stackexchange ar
Hi Recently I've started moving a fleet of Debian 7, 32-bit machines
over to Debian 9, 64-bit. This migration is done by creating a fresh
Debian 9 image with the necessary services, moving over user data (some
wars and the content of /home) and rebooting into the new OS.
Relevant services (one
On jueves, 26 de abril de 2018 13:35:41 (CEST) Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> davmail is an executable jar which uses jarwrapper which uses
> binfmt_misc[1] to make arbitrary files executable.
>
> It seems the binfmt-support service has not run properly on your
> machine. Does restarting it fix the prob
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:11:44PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> That's right, mbox uses this one as marker. That's why a "naked" From at
> the beginning of a line, like this one:
>
> From there and where
>
> gets "escaped" by prepending something (I think this is done by the
> mail delivery a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 07:53:54AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 26, 2018 01:29:17 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:05:41PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > > Yes, the message came from tomas, but the e
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 01:29:17 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:05:41PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Yes, the message came from tomas, but the email you received came from
> > the list server. There will be a header at the top of your email
>
> > that's being hidden
Hi,
> I have a problem with davmail package in debian testing and need some advise.
>
> If I install it I can start and stop the service via systemctl without any
> problem and it works flawlessly.
>
> However, after a reboot, the service does not start. I get the following
> error:
>
> abr 26 10:
On 2018-04-25, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My goal is a very minimalist install to a flash drive. It will NOT have
> GRUB - GRUB on this machine is on a dedicated partition for convenience
> in some of my experiments.
>
> From reading several references I believe my command should be:
>
> debootst
Hi list:
I have a problem with davmail package in debian testing and need some advise.
If I install it I can start and stop the service via systemctl without any
problem and it works flawlessly.
However, after a reboot, the service does not start. I get the following
error:
abr 26 10:51:00 l
20 matches
Mail list logo
