Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

2017-12-30 Thread David Christensen
On 12/30/17 14:38, Matthew Crews wrote: The main issue I see with using BTRFS with MDADM is that you lose the benefit of bit-rot repair. MDADM can't correct bit rot, but BTRFS-Raid (and ZFS raid arrays) can, but only with native raid configurations. AFAIK: 1. mdadm RAID1 can fix bit rot, so

Keyboard lock-up with complications

2017-12-30 Thread Weaver
Greetings all, I have a curly one here and, not having seen anything similar on the lists, thought I'd better post something immediately as it may be malicious. I was typing something up on one of the social media platforms - which tends me to think this way, as I don't toe the party line - and f

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

2017-12-30 Thread Matthew Crews
> Original Message >Subject: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? >Local Time: December 29, 2017 5:37 PM >UTC Time: December 30, 2017 12:37 AM >From: j...@jvales.net > The problem with btrfs-raid10 (with 6 disks): it self-destructed itself > on our

Re: bios/aes_vt

2017-12-30 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:54:00PM -, sejobu...@bitmessage.de wrote: > i have an option in my new pc/bios : vt virtualization > does it help the pc to work 'better' or is it used only when i run a vm ? To my best knowledge, only virtualization software is using it. > i have an op

bios/aes_vt

2017-12-30 Thread sejobud33
i have an option in my new pc/bios : vt virtualization does it help the pc to work 'better' or is it used only when i run a vm ? i have an option in my new pc/bios : aes does it help the pc to work 'better' or is it used only when i run the disk encryption feature ? - are these feature related at

Re: BIND DNS problem after upgrading from Wheezy to Squeeze

2017-12-30 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit : >> >> On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >>> Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large >>> packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at >>> your firewall/NAT Gateway?

Re: Machine freezes and crashes with the message "soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s!"

2017-12-30 Thread Joe
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:47:23 +0100 Alex ARNAUD wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm helping a user to figure out an issue. On her syslog file I could > find: > > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! > > > - Package version of firmware-amd-graphics: 20161130-3~bpo8+1 > - The graphic card named obt

Re: Machine freezes and crashes with the message "soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s!"

2017-12-30 Thread deloptes
Alex ARNAUD wrote: > Her configuration is that one: > - Debian Jessie 8.10 > > - Kernel : Linux colossus 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 > (2017-12-13) x86_64 GNU/Linux > - Kernel package: linux-image-amd64 version "3.16+63" > > - Xorg version: 1.16.4 > - Package version of xserver-xorg-c

Machine freezes and crashes with the message "soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s!"

2017-12-30 Thread Alex ARNAUD
Hello all, I'm helping a user to figure out an issue. On her syslog file I could find: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! And the following stack trace: Stack: Dec 28 14:34:09 colossus kernel: [946492.108011] a041af86 880429a20728 a04a801d 0001 Dec 28 14

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

2017-12-30 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 30/12/2017 à 00:48, Jan Vales a écrit : You still can go md-raid + btrfs, if you want some btrfs features. Snapshots (and send/receive) are what I really love on my laptop and could not live without anymore. (fulldisk encryption may be mandatory, as btrfs at least some time ago, had the tende