Hi,
I've been asked that "can we verify old archive - e.g. squeeze? Since
VyOS is based on squeeze and want to build packages with squeeze
environment, and also want to ensure package is sane with GPG".
I have no idea - can someone tell me your idea, please?
--
Hideki Yamane
Bonjour Angelique
Une fois franchi le portail du Sauveur, la nef, longue de sept travées, est
flanquée, jusqu' à la fin du xllle siècle, de bas-cotés simples. Elle
impressionne d' autant plus que des chapelles, aménagées entre les contreforts
de 1292 à 1375,
There was a recent thread where the symptom, in one sense, was somewhat
similar--on a two CPU system, one CPU was using 100% of one CPU with the lid
closed. IIUC, the problem was due to lightdm-gt (or some sub-program).
Here are the headers from the last message in that thread:
Re: Debian 9.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 16:26:39 -0400
Jeffry Smith wrote:
> I have an old laptop with a Pentium II (686-pae) and an ATI Rage 128
> (r128.ko) Mobility M3 video card. When attempting to run vlc,
> kaffeine, or mpv, they attempt o open up libvdpau_nvidia.so, which
> doesn't work. I've tried disablin
(If this message already arrived I apologize, I'm struggling with this
mailing list thing a little bit.)
Hi everyone,
It's been a while since I've run my system, but since starting it up
yesterday and downloading updates, I've noticed a new problem. This
machine typically runs as a server, even
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 16:26:39 -0400
Jeffry Smith wrote:
> I have an old laptop with a Pentium II (686-pae) and an ATI Rage 128
> (r128.ko) Mobility M3 video card. When attempting to run vlc,
> kaffeine, or mpv, they attempt o open up libvdpau_nvidia.so, which
> doesn't work. I've tried dis
I have an old laptop with a Pentium II (686-pae) and an ATI Rage 128
(r128.ko) Mobility M3 video card. When attempting to run vlc,
kaffeine, or mpv, they attempt o open up libvdpau_nvidia.so, which
doesn't work. I've tried disabling hardware decoding in VLC, but it
still tries to open that libra
Am 14.10.2017 um 21:48 schrieb Glen B:
> 295 root 20 07448 4432 3992 R 41.2 0.9 0:54.81
> systemd-logind
> 298 message+ 20 06260 3636 3268 S 17.6 0.7 0:17.12 dbus-daemon
That looks like there is a huge amount of dbus messages sent.
Can you run dbus-monitor --sy
On 10/15/2017 11:55 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 10/15/17, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>> On 10/15/2017 06:57 PM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2017 08:32 AM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
I have been running Debian Stretch with LXDE for about 1 week.
I turned on the P
On 10/15/17, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
> On 10/15/2017 06:57 PM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>> On 10/15/2017 08:32 AM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been running Debian Stretch with LXDE for about 1 week.
>>>
>>> I turned on the PC this morning and and found out that the main LXDE
>>> pa
Hi everyone,
It's been a while since I've run my system, but since starting it up
yesterday and downloading updates, I've noticed a new problem. This
machine typically runs as a server, even though it's a laptop. That
means I usually leave the lid closed so the screen turns off, but the
system
On 10/15/2017 06:57 PM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/2017 08:32 AM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been running Debian Stretch with LXDE for about 1 week.
>>
>> I turned on the PC this morning and and found out that the main LXDE
>> panel at bottom (default panel)
On 10/15/2017 08:32 AM, A_Man_Without_Clue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been running Debian Stretch with LXDE for about 1 week.
>
> I turned on the PC this morning and and found out that the main LXDE
> panel at bottom (default panel) is gone.
>
> I had added additional panel at the side with f
On 10/15/2017 03:31 PM, Floris wrote:
> Op Sun, 15 Oct 2017 02:28:10 +0200 schreef A_Man_Without_Clue
> :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just posted question regarding LXDE panel, but
>>
>> i was just trying to see if it would make differences if I switched to
>> GNOME desktop and go back to LXDE hopi
On 10/15/2017 03:55 AM, John Ratliff wrote:
> In my case, the user on the client I was testing was UID 1003, which
> on the server he was UID 1000. So they both had the group, but UID
> 1003 on the server did not have the group, because that user did not
> exist. Therefore, permission denied.
Then
15 matches
Mail list logo