-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 02:58:59PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >From terminal A (may be xterm or xfce4-terminal), launch terminals:
>
> MYVAR="wow - some text!" xterm &
> MYVAR="wow - some text!" xfce4-terminal &
>
> Now from those terminals, r
>From terminal A (may be xterm or xfce4-terminal), launch terminals:
MYVAR="wow - some text!" xterm &
MYVAR="wow - some text!" xfce4-terminal &
Now from those terminals, run:
echo $MYVAR
In xterm, we get the expected output - evidently MYVAR is correctly
"passed through" - this is how env v
> I have a directory named /media/joe, with joe:joe 750 permissions. I'm
> reasonably sure that systemd originally created that, but if you have
> an appropriate directory which was created with different permissions,
> that may be a problem.
>
Thank you! Mine was mostafa:root 755, I don't know wh
On 2017-10-02 12:26, Gary Roach wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 09:31 AM, Reco wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:16:20PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
>>> On 26/09/17 19:50, Reco wrote:
Please post these things from the problematic PC:
ip a l
ip ro l
>>>
>>> Can I make a request?
On 09/27/2017 09:31 AM, Reco wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:16:20PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
On 26/09/17 19:50, Reco wrote:
Please post these things from the problematic PC:
ip a l
ip ro l
Can I make a request? When giving example commands, can you give them in
full, rather than abbr
On Sun 01 Oct 2017 at 13:36:28 (-0700), Gary Roach wrote:
> OK, I've been remiss in getting you the information requested. I
> think what you need is in the attachments. Nowhere have I found
> reference to 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 name servers. I have tried serveral
> different ways to get them into the
* From: Curt
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:22:48 + (UTC)
> I'm reading that this material requires a tweak:
> options uvcvideo quirks=0x100
> in
> /etc/modprobe.d/uvcvideo.conf
I was using quirks=0x80 but can try 100 also.
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456
* From: Reco
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:10:35 +0300
> reportbug is teasing you.
> Today's kernel update bumped the kernel to 4.9.30-2+deb9u5.
> Update the kernel, disregard reportbug warning and file a bugreport.
Now I have the kernel you mention and a /dev/video0. A little
progres
On 09/27/2017 09:31 AM, Reco wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:16:20PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
On 26/09/17 19:50, Reco wrote:
Please post these things from the problematic PC:
ip a l
ip ro l
Can I make a request? When giving example commands, can you give them in
full, rather than abbr
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 18:46:18 +0330
Mostafa Shahverdy wrote:
> The whole idea for changing the content came from the fact that my usb
> drives were mounting as read-only for non-root users, so I tried to
> fix it and no luck. So at the end I removed my entries for removable
> media. I still have th
On Sunday 01 October 2017 11:56:01 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:36:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >--binary-files=TYPE
>
> [...]
>
> > And that, while lots more typing, seems to duplicate the -I option.
>
> It does; actually, --binary-files=foo gives you some more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:36:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >--binary-files=TYPE
[...]
> And that, while lots more typing, seems to duplicate the -I option.
It does; actually, --binary-files=foo gives you some more control, depending
on , w
On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:55:33 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > -I Proce
The whole idea for changing the content came from the fact that my usb
drives were mounting as read-only for non-root users, so I tried to fix it
and no luck. So at the end I removed my entries for removable media.
I still have that very problem of read-only removable media for my user.
On Sun, Oc
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 18:26:58 +0330
Mostafa Shahverdy wrote:
> Maybe this is something with my /etc/fstab? because I tried to change
> the content. Right now there is no entry for my USB disk there.
On the whole, there is no need for entries for removable media
in /etc/fstab, unless you have some
Maybe this is something with my /etc/fstab? because I tried to change the
content. Right now there is no entry for my USB disk there.
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Mostafa Shahverdy
wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Using my own system, it copies at most 200kps while using a live cd it
>>> copies
>>> up to 4Mp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > -I Process a binary file as if i
>> Using my own system, it copies at most 200kps while using a live cd it
>> copies
>> up to 4Mps
>>
>
> measured how?
>
That's what Nautilus show while copying a movie to my disk.
but to make sure, I tried using dd to have a better measurement:
$ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of="/media/mostafa/Trans
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data;
>
On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data;
> > this is equivalent to the --binary-files=without-match option.
> >
> > Sure, thats sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data; this
> is equivalent to the --binary-files=without-match option.
>
> Sure, thats supposed to tell me it will
On Sunday 01 October 2017 08:13:00 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > > Assuri
When I upgraded from postgresql 9.6 to 10, the postgres server failed to
start. Error message: 'max_wal_senders must be less than
max_connections'. The configuration file
/etc/postgresql/10/main/postgresql.conf has the line
#max_wal_senders = 0
suggesting that 0 is a default value. When I removed
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:44:45PM +0300, Victor Porton wrote:
I received no satisfactory answer.
So I feel that there is no Debian policy on using port numbers.
This policy should be added to Debian!
It may be something like: "Debian packages (with default configuration) are
allowed to bind p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:44:45PM +0300, Victor Porton wrote:
> Victor Porton wrote:
>
> > We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> > installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> > times, we need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:13:00PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
[...]
> You haven't looked hard enough. It's "grep -I".
> Those manpages, sometimes reading them works wonders.
Messages crossed. Great minds think alike ;-)
Cheers
- -- t
-BEGIN
Victor Porton wrote:
> We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> times, we need to use port numbers different than the standard Debian port
> numbers chosen by default (because we can't run more than on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > Assuring that my port is not in
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:11:12AM +0330, Mostafa Shahverdy wrote:
Can you quantify the performance
Using my own system, it copies at most 200kps while using a live cd it copies
up to 4Mps
measured how?
[1.516112] usb 3-3: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
[1.66646
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
>
On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
> > > > ensure that my port number will not clash with a port number
> > > > used by a Debi
Victor Porton wrote:
> We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> times, we need to use port numbers different than the standard Debian port
> numbers chosen by default (because we can't run more than on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:34:19AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> My advice [...]
Needless to say, I'd go with "simple", unless there's a very strong
reason against it. "Complex" is re-implementing the portmapper. Or
all those other orchestr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
> > > ensure that my port number will not clash with a port number used by
> > > a Debian package (by default).
34 matches
Mail list logo
