FHDATA composed on 2017-07-18 21:30 (UTC-0600):
> this is a KDE 4.14.x question.
> a showstopper I need to find a remedy/fix
> or find myself another desktop.
> It seems that in KDE everything is single-instance!
> in particular I am in need of being able to launch
> multiple instances of Konso
Hi,
i have one diskless server able to boot with ISCSI, uefi is configures
to reach iscsi target and volume correctly;
i installed Debian 9 with debian installer ad all works fine, at the
end of installation process i remount root filesystem with (chroot
/target) and edit initaramfs.conf with:
I
On 07/18/2017 10:53 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 20:18:07 Ben Finney wrote:
Teemu Likonen writes:
Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not
being free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do
they compl
hello all,
this is a KDE 4.14.x question.
a showstopper I need to find a remedy/fix
or find myself another desktop.
It seems that in KDE everything is single-instance!
in particular I am in need of being able to launch
multiple instances of Konsole or heck even a whole
bunch of xterms
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 20:18:07 Ben Finney wrote:
> Teemu Likonen writes:
> > Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
> > > My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not
> > > being free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do
> > > they complain?
> >
What has not bein
Doug composed on 2017-07-18 19:42 (UTC-0500):
> The local government has the right to prescribe
> what you can do to the house!
Actually in the USA that's false, at least WRT a property owner doing his own
work, but state and local governments have been following the federal
government's lead, p
On 07/18/2017 07:48 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Doug writes:
On 07/18/2017 07:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not
being free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do
they complain?
If anyone who
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Dominik George wrote:
> it? Thanks!
> topic and stop
> gone horribly off-
> that this thread has
> all just agree
> So, can we
> Sent from my very colourful mailer which encodes as it pleases.
>
ROFCOL :)
Just for reference, this thread just misses paralleling a
Doug writes:
> On 07/18/2017 07:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
> >>> My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not
> >>> being free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do
> >>> they complain?
> > If anyone who wanted to improve th
On 07/18/2017 07:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Teemu Likonen writes:
Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they
complain?
Free software has the advantage that it does no
Teemu Likonen writes:
> Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
>
> > My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
> > free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they
> > complain?
>
> Free software has the advantage that it does not depend on just one
> compan
On Tue 18 Jul 2017 at 16:05:48 -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> >Because there"s more control by civil society of the tools shaping
> >our future?
> What control does society have over science and technology? None!
Bollocks. We no longer have the chariot or leeches.
> What cont
On Tue 18 Jul 2017 at 21:20:42 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> [...]
>
> > My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
> > free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they
> > complain?
>
> Because th
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jennifer Pibita
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:09
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Someone says I’m an idiot I allowed these pictures to be posted,
Jennifer
But I am not so sure about it. Take a look
http://bitly.com/2tJId6w
---
This email has been checke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:05:48PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> >Because there"s more control by civil society of the tools shaping
> >our future?
> What control does society have over science and technology? None!
> What control
it? Thanks!
topic and stop
gone horribly off-
that this thread has
all just agree
So, can we
Sent from my very colourful mailer which encodes as it pleases.
From: to...@tuxteam.de
>Because there"s more control by civil society of the tools shaping
>our future?
What control does society have over science and technology? None!
What control does society have over religious beliefs? None!
What control does society have over media and information? None!
Wha
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:00:10PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, mar...@martinbrandenburg.com a écrit :
> > I don't read messages from you or in fact anyone at your domain, except
> > this one, because they're written in base64.
>
> If you see the base64, then you
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:52 AM, RavenLX wrote:
> > On 07/18/2017 01:43 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:38:55 -0500
> > > Doug wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Doug,
> > >
> > > > I get so sick of this! Did you PAY for your nvidia sof
"This indicates a broken system, not a broken distribution."
Actually, I would partially disagree. A system has many lines of development
(subsystems) which interact so as to compose a system that just works: two
examples of such subsystems might include an automated update system and a
man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Doug wrote:
[...]
> My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
> free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they
> complain?
Because they sympathize with those who can
From: geo...@nsup.org
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, mar...@martinbrandenburg.com a écrit :
> I don"t read messages from you or in fact anyone at your domain, except
> this one, because they"re written in base64.
=If you see the base64, then your mail software is
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:25:34 -0500
Doug wrote:
Hello Doug,
>My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
>free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they complain?
For the same reason people take an idealogical stance on anything -
Ability to act on their
Doug [2017-07-18 13:25:34-05] wrote:
> My point is that most of the folks who complain about code not being
> free to modify are not capable of modifying it, so why do they
> complain?
Free software has the advantage that it does not depend on just one
company and its interests. A free software c
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 7/18/17 12:52 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> >Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base installed on a
> >system is completely intact? Perl base is perl binary and all support
> >packages that binary uses before cpan or cpanp is run. The perl base is
>
On 07/18/2017 05:52 AM, RavenLX wrote:
On 07/18/2017 01:43 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:38:55 -0500
Doug wrote:
Hello Doug,
I get so sick of this! Did you PAY for your nvidia software? No? then
Anyone that buys an nVidia chipset GFX card pays for the nVidia
drivers -
wh
On Tue 18 Jul 2017 at 12:52:15 (-0400), Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base
> installed on a system is completely intact? Perl base is perl
> binary and all support packages that binary uses before cpan or
> cpanp is run. The perl base is put on newl
Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, mar...@martinbrandenburg.com a écrit :
> I don't read messages from you or in fact anyone at your domain, except
> this one, because they're written in base64.
If you see the base64, then your mail software is broken or hopelessly
outdated. Technically, this mail w
> From fungil...@protonmail.com Tue Jul 18 13:32:11 2017
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 05:18:19 -0400
> To: debian users
> From: Fungi4All
> Reply-To: Fungi4All
> Subject: Re: so much for your ascii only emails and 80 char lines :)
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --b1_264fd2e3c1f
On 7/18/17 12:52 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base installed
on a system is completely intact? Perl base is perl binary and all
support packages that binary uses before cpan or cpanp is run. The
perl base is put on newly installed systems.
I
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:52:15PM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base installed on a
> system is completely intact? Perl base is perl binary and all support
> packages that binary uses before cpan or cpanp is run. The perl base is put
> on ne
On 7/18/17, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base installed on a
> system is completely intact? Perl base is perl binary and all support
> packages that binary uses before cpan or cpanp is run. The perl base is
> put on newly installed systems.
> I am
On 18-07-17, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote:
> That's not exactly what I'm seeing. I began seeding the Debian 9.0
> installer image on 6/17 and the Live image on 6/20, when the 9.0.1 released.
>
> debian-9.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso 171.36 GB
> debian-live-9.0.1-amd64-gnome.iso 157.90 GB
> debian-live-9.0.1
Does any means exist within perl to detect that a perl base installed on a
system is completely intact? Perl base is perl binary and all support
packages that binary uses before cpan or cpanp is run. The perl base is
put on newly installed systems.
I am interested in this since sometimes syste
That's not exactly what I'm seeing. I began seeding the Debian 9.0
installer image on 6/17 and the Live image on 6/20, when the 9.0.1 released.
debian-9.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso 171.36 GB
debian-live-9.0.1-amd64-gnome.iso 157.90 GB
debian-live-9.0.1-amd64-cinnamon.iso 107.85 GB
debian-9.0.0-amd64-ne
Hi,
Erik Christiansen wrote:
> Would it be impertinent to enquire why the malfunctioning install option
> is not disabled, when it only serves to tarnish the reputation of debian?
I understand that the future of Debian live ISOs depends on the
contribution by developers and users. See
https://l
> From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:52AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>> www.debian.org -> "CD/USB ISO images"
> That"s where your eyes go? That"s interesting.
? what are you, an optometrist?
> My eyes skip the banner with its embedded "download me" link (because
>
On 18-07-17, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote:
> Many people have had issues installing with the Live installer on this
> mailing list. The question is why Debian even offers the option if there
> is no interest in testing it to make it work. The initial live installer
> images (9.0, before 9.0.1) were
On 18.07.17 10:29, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:52AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > www.debian.org -> "CD/USB ISO images"
>
> That's where your eyes go? That's interesting.
Only because this time it's an install from USB, and it's under the
heading "Getting Debian".
Many people have had issues installing with the Live installer on this
mailing list. The question is why Debian even offers the option if there
is no interest in testing it to make it work. The initial live installer
images (9.0, before 9.0.1) were completely broken and could not even begin
the i
On 18.07.17 15:47, Darac Marjal wrote:
> Did you read the two yellow boxes at the top of that page?
No, it did not register as text, because it was block colour-guified,
which my (other side of 60) mind registered as "commented out - do not
read". The tiny fontsize visually confirmed that it must
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:52AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 18.07.17 08:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:26AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> This release of Debian came with buggy live images. It was fixed with
> 9.0.1 live images, or at least it seemed so.
No, the
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:52AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> www.debian.org -> "CD/USB ISO images"
That's where your eyes go? That's interesting.
My eyes skip the banner with its embedded "download me" link (because
it's a friggin' BANNER, and decades of web use have taught me to skip
al
On 18.07.17 11:06, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> On the other hand, if you just want to _install_ Debian rather than to
> run it as "live" system, then you should for now use one of the
> installation ISOs.
> E.g. the small one which is just enough to fetch more packages from the
> internet:
>
>
> ht
On 18.07.17 08:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:26AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> > This release of Debian came with buggy live images. It was fixed with
> > 9.0.1 live images, or at least it seemed so.
>
> No, the 9.0.1 Debian live images are still broken when used for
> in
Thank you Greg! It is working now! Thank you for the detailed explanation.
Have a good day :)
On 18 July 2017 at 15:49, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:41:10PM +0200, Ferenc Radics wrote:
> > root@xy:/# apt-cache policy libsybdb5
> > libsybdb5:
> > Installed: (none)
> > C
>> Not a single response on why two packages exist in unstable that are
>> incapable of being installed?
> That"s right …
>> Qupzilla 2.1.2 exists in the unstable repository as a replacement to 1.8.9
>> that lies in testing.
>> But it is prevented to install as it would cause breakage. I can"t fi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 08:29:46PM +, Andrea Neroni wrote:
>
>
>
> > Is it really required?
>
>
> Don't know, that's why I'm asking.
>
> > I have no such lines in my .tex file, I'm starting to wondering "Is it
> > your (or mine!) template up to date?" or "Did your template contain
> > som
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:41:10PM +0200, Ferenc Radics wrote:
> root@xy:/# apt-cache policy libsybdb5
> libsybdb5:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: (none)
> Version table:
> root@xy:/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.6.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1
> 20
Yes I tried apt-get -f install. It did nothing: "0 upgraded, 0 newly
installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded."
root@xy:/# apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
500 http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates/main Translation-en
500 http://security.debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:52:05 -0400
> RavenLX wrote:
>
> Hello RavenLX,
>
> >This poses an interesting question: Why would a company keep something
> >proprietary such as a driver?
>
>
On Tue 18 Jul 2017 at 08:36:21 (-0400), Fungi4All wrote:
> Not a single response on why two packages exist in unstable that are
> incapable of being installed?
That's right …
> Qupzilla 2.1.2 exists in the unstable repository as a replacement to 1.8.9
> that lies in testing.
> But it is prevent
Ce n'est pas moi qui a posté tes photos sur intenet
Toute fois je veux bien faire ta connaissance,je suis libre
Bisous à Bientot j'espére
Léon
Le 18 juillet 2017 à 12:57, Maelle Ndereba a écrit :
> C’était toi? Je parle de ceux là
> http://bit.ly/2u4Utyo
>
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 08:20:20 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> WHY DO PEOPLE ATTEMPT TO INSTALL DEBIAN USING A LIVE CD IMAGE
>
> ESPECIALLY WHEN IT HASN'T WORKED IN MANY YEARS
>
> G
>
> Why don't people use the installer to install?
>
> I just can't understand.
Well, just in an effort to att
Not a single response on why two packages exist in unstable that are incapable
of being installed?
Qupzilla 2.1.2 exists in the unstable repository as a replacement to 1.8.9 that
lies in testing.
But it is prevented to install as it would cause breakage. I can"t figure out
why or which dependenc
> From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:26AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
>> This release of Debian came with buggy live images. It was fixed with
>> 9.0.1 live images, or at least it seemed so.
> No, the 9.0.1 Debian live images are still broken when used for
> installations. They
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Ferenc Radics wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> php5-sybase : Depends: libsybdb5 (>= 0.63) but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
The bit about "held broken packages" is not reass
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:26AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> This release of Debian came with buggy live images. It was fixed with
> 9.0.1 live images, or at least it seemed so.
No, the 9.0.1 Debian live images are still broken when used for
installations. They fail to set a root password or to
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:52:05 -0400
RavenLX wrote:
Hello RavenLX,
>This poses an interesting question: Why would a company keep something
>proprietary such as a driver?
Control. And the (misguided?) belief that they'll end up fielding tech
support questions for driver modifications they didn't
> On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 07:52:18 CEST Gabriele Cossetti wrote:
>> I"ve just installed Debian 9.0 on a IBM PC 386. I have the a
>> Sitecom N150 USB WI-FI adapter that won"t work after installation.
>>
>> What should I do to have it work?
> What"s the output of lsusb?
The N150 may be a trade name
On 07/18/2017 01:43 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:38:55 -0500
Doug wrote:
Hello Doug,
I get so sick of this! Did you PAY for your nvidia software? No? then
Anyone that buys an nVidia chipset GFX card pays for the nVidia drivers -
whether they use them, or not.
it was FREE!
On 18-07-17, Gabriele Cossetti wrote:
> Ascoli Piceno - Italia - 18/07/2017
>
> Ho appena installato la versione Debian 9.0, ho una connessione WI-FI su
> PC IBM .386 che usa una porta USB del seguente produttore:
>
> WI-FI USB Sitecom adapter N150
>
> e dopo l'installazione non risulta funzion
Usually the language used here is english. I translate your question, so more
people can understand it.
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 07:52:18 CEST Gabriele Cossetti wrote:
> I've just installed Debian 9.0 on a IBM PC 386. I have the a
> Sitecom N150 USB WI-FI adapter that won't work after installati
Ascoli Piceno - Italia - 18/07/2017
Ho appena installato la versione Debian 9.0, ho una connessione WI-FI su
PC IBM .386 che usa una porta USB del seguente produttore:
WI-FI USB Sitecom adapter N150
e dopo l'installazione non risulta funzionante.
Cosa devo fare per renderla funzionante?
Cordi
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:45:08PM +1000, julius wrote:
I have problems with updating debian stretch you people say that
ftp mirrors are not going to serve debian any more i am in australia .I
am not a good command line user only the basics and a lot of reading
from forums on problems to solv
Can you read it now?
Nobody has ever complained about the encoding of English before.
Unless you are the source of the spam!
From: fungil...@protonmail.com
It seems the virus has moved now to Turkey's smart phone community
If we do the stats in a month or two this will be 90% of the daily
traffic.
From: jode...@gmail.com:
> This release of Debian came with buggy live images. It was fixed with
> 9.0.1 live images, or at least it seemed so. Perhaps you discovered bug
> in it that should be reported. Unfortunately, debian live images do not
> get much needed love and because of that are not rea
Hi,
Erik Christiansen wrote:
> after setting
> geographic location and keyboard, the debian 9 install process threw up
> a "Detect and mount CD-ROM" screen, insisting on a CD with suitable
> install content. It seemed quite unaware that it is installing from USB.
Well, that's much deeper in the l
On 18-07-17, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 18.07.17 08:46, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Afaik, unetbootin unpacks the ISO and replaces the boot loader software.
> > Debian discourages its use with live and installation ISOs.
> >
> > The Debian ISOs for i386 are ready to be simply copied onto the devi
On 18.07.17 08:46, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Afaik, unetbootin unpacks the ISO and replaces the boot loader software.
> Debian discourages its use with live and installation ISOs.
>
> The Debian ISOs for i386 are ready to be simply copied onto the device
> file of the overall USB stick (i.e. to /dev
Marc, maybe if you compare the output from alsa-info.sh[1] of your daughter's PC
to the other two you could spot a package omission or some discrepancy? If you
can't, maybe run pastebinit for us to see it?
[1] https://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Help_To_Debug
--
"The wise are known for th
Please explain who you are. I am not understanding your message.
On Saturday, 8 July 2017, 18:01, MICHAEL TURNER
wrote:
Pardon?
On Friday, 7 July 2017, 21:28, Margaret Tampwnz
wrote:
Will you reveal me what do you like?
http://bitly.com/2sW6CSv
hello
I have a debian 8.6 server:
root@xy:/# uname -a
Linux xy 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64
GNU/Linux
With php (5.6.30) I would like to connect to a mssql database that is on my
local network but i get this error message in my apache error log:
PHP Fatal erro
On 07/16/2017 03:18 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 07/14/2017 02:09 AM, Curt wrote:
Or maybe during the redaction of your post you left out the '-r' flag by
inadvertence.
Correct. The -r should have been included.
BTW, I solved the problem of the directory and files not being
recreated. My da
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:20:10 +1000
julius wrote:
(...)
>
> http://security.debian.org/dists/stretch/updates/InRelease:
> The key(s)
> in the keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg are ignored as the
> file is not
> readable by user '_apt' executing
> apt-
> key.http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/stre
75 matches
Mail list logo
