On 03/08/2017 02:53 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 03/08/2017 11:34 AM, Richard Owlet wrote:
On 03/08/2017 12:32 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 3/8/17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I recently installed grml-debootstrap from a purchased DVD set of
Jessie(8.6.0). I have minimal available bandwidth so I i
Hi,
David Christensen wrote:
> Examining a Windows XP disk, the first partition (C:\) starts at block 63
> (track 1):
> [...]
> Number Start End SizeType File system Flags
> 1 63s156296384s 156296322s primary ntfs boot
That's an oldfashioned layout. Bad
David Christensen composed on 2017-03-08 21:46 (UTC-0800):
...
Examining a Jesse system drive, the first partition starts at block 2048
(1 MB = 2**20 bytes):
2017-03-08 21:30:04 root@jesse ~
# parted /dev/sda u s p
Model: ATA SAMSUNG SSD UM41 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 31277232s
Sector size (logica
On 3/8/2017 4:53 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Hi Richard,
First, unless you are using something older than Jessie you can
use apt as in #apt update or #apt purge, apt-get is no longer
needed.
I am using Jessie, 8.6.0 with MATE Desktop.
Due to bandwidth limitations, I install strictly from
On 03/08/2017 03:02 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
AFAIK when using MBR partitioning, the partition table (blocks 0-62)
The MBR partition table resides in the first 512-bytes block.
It may be extended by a chain of partitions starting at the Extended
Partition of the MBR pa
The download page for Debian stable CDs at
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ has a bunch
of options like CD-1, CD-2, etc., KDE, LXDE and XFCE.
But the download page for Debian testing CDs at
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ does not
seem to have CD-
Anyone knows where this kerberos detailed log might be. I can't find it.
Failed to start Kerberos 5 Key Distribution Center.
See 'systemctl status krb5-kdc.service' for details.
I found this on the boot.log
And the following somewhere else:
Mar 8 11:04:35 G0 systemd[1]: Starting Kerberos 5 Ke
On 03/08/2017 11:34 AM, Richard Owlet wrote:
On 03/08/2017 12:32 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 3/8/17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I recently installed grml-debootstrap from a purchased DVD set of
Jessie(8.6.0). I have minimal available bandwidth so I install strictly
from DVDs.
I have discovered
>So my question: If I don't want to use the BIOS's Fake RAID, and want
>to
>use only the Linux kernel's software RAID, do I want to turn RAID off
>in
>the BIOS
Yes.
Also, always prefer dmraid over some fake RAID.
-nik
At https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SataRaid are these words:
Not to be confused with the Linux kernel's software RAID feature (Multidisk
> Device). This is the preferable and more reliable method to establish
> software RAID arrays.
> See the Debian installation guide for more information.
On Wed 08 Mar 2017 at 13:34:08 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 12:32 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> >On 3/8/17, Richard Owlett wrote:
[Lots of snipping to get to to the heart of the question]
> >>What is the most effective way to completely remove an application?
> >
[More snipping
Dominik George wrote:
How do I check the systemd-networkd thing?
ps aux… ;)
The MAC changing would also have to be configured in
/etc/systemd/network .
Unfortunately systemd wasn't to blame here, no systemd-networkd running
and no configuration files in /etc/systemd/network.
I add that I
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Thanks for your help. The above didn't show all headers, but I found
> the bug in the curl function call of the client:
>
> curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER,
> array('Content-Type: text/xml',
> 'POST $lo
s...@debian.org writes:
> > Why is it that if I have _ in my segment, apache2 rejects the request
> > without 'HttpProtocolOptions strict'?
>
> Try setting
>
> Loglevel core:debug http:debug
>
> and look if the error log provides more information.
Thanks for your help. The above didn't show a
On 03/08/2017 12:32 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 3/8/17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I recently installed grml-debootstrap from a purchased DVD set of
Jessie(8.6.0). I have minimal available bandwidth so I install strictly
from DVDs.
I have discovered a potential bug for my specific use case and b
On 03/08/2017 12:24 PM, Frank wrote:
Op 08-03-17 om 19:01 schreef Richard Owlett:
What is the most effective way to completely remove an application?
Remove it - as you did - including the configuration files (i.e. any
files in /etc). Then check your home directory - also ~/.config and
~/.loca
On 3/8/17, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I recently installed grml-debootstrap from a purchased DVD set of
> Jessie(8.6.0). I have minimal available bandwidth so I install strictly
> from DVDs.
>
> I have discovered a potential bug for my specific use case and believe
> I've narrowed the problem source
Op 08-03-17 om 19:01 schreef Richard Owlett:
What is the most effective way to completely remove an application?
Remove it - as you did - including the configuration files (i.e. any
files in /etc). Then check your home directory - also ~/.config and
~/.local/share - for any user owned configu
On Wed 08 Mar 2017 at 16:29:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Hello, this is OP speaking :)
> My use is about 96% backing up the image and only when things fall apart
> will there be a restoring attempt. But what good would saving multiple
> successive images be if none can be ever restored?
This
I recently installed grml-debootstrap from a purchased DVD set of
Jessie(8.6.0). I have minimal available bandwidth so I install strictly
from DVDs.
I have discovered a potential bug for my specific use case and believe
I've narrowed the problem source to two specific files.
I have used scri
Hello, this is OP speaking :)
Thomas Schmitt:
> Hi,
>
> David Wright wrote:
>> Forgive me for asking, but have you read the OP?
>
> Yep. It's a daredevil situation. "Damn the torpedos, full speed ahead"
I promise to be more cautious on my next life, maybe a cheetah laying in
the sun all day.
>
2017-03-08 16:45 keltezéssel, SZ, Zsolt írta:
> As we have corporate proxy with NTLM authentication I am using CNTLM
> daemon for authentication and using localhost as proxy. It was working
> fine until yesterday. Any not secure traffic works fine though and
> local ssh is working fine as well. Mos
Hello,
I have a sid machine and yesterday after update and restart my system I get
invalid certificate for every secure page (web pages, git clone with https,
and so). I have not changed anything else just update and reboot.
As we have corporate proxy with NTLM authentication I am using CNTLM dae
Hi
I noticed you wrote about Kali Linux on your site, here:
packages.backports.org/News/weekly/2013/06/
It is great to have you helping users get to know Kali.
Mr Ghaznavi-Zadeh just published a chapter from his book "Kali Linux – A
guide to Ethical hacking" and it is available for free here:
ht
Hi,
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> So each manufacturer may have a different internal system but the output
> is standardized. So we don't really know what goes on in there, right?
Yes. We programmers enjoy the simplified model of an array of consecutive
logical blocks. The physical blocks are a matter of
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Why is it that if I have _ in my segment, apache2 rejects the request
> without 'HttpProtocolOptions strict'?
Try setting
Loglevel core:debug http:debug
and look if the error log provides more information.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:34:54AM +0200, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de writes:
>
> > Note the underscored parts. You are talking about (path) segments.
[...]
> Thanks for your answer. The request below works over TLS in apache2
> 2.4.10-
Juha Heinanen writes:
> Thanks for your answer. The request below works over TLS in apache2
> 2.4.10-10+deb8u7, but fails in 2.4.10-10+deb8u8 unless I turn on
>
> #HttpProtocolOptions unsafe
>
> There is crlf after each line and there are no tabs.
>
> I can't figure out what is wrong with it.
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
> Note the underscored parts. You are talking about (path) segments.
> Underscore is fine there. Problem is host and domain names, and 3986 is
> pretty deliberately handwavy there (3.2.2 host). Apart from IP addresses
> it refers to good ol' DNS (1123, 952. Ah, Those folks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:07:53AM +0200, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> My web app stopped working in apache2 2.4.10-10+deb8u8 and looks like
> the reason is this:
>
> * CVE-2016-8743: Enforce more HTTP conformance for request lines and
> request heade
30 matches
Mail list logo
