Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote:
>
>> Neal P. Murphy wrote:
>> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter)
>> > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE
>> > which is about as simple and is as useful as KDE
On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote:
> Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter)
> > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE
> > which is about as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was.
>
> KDE3 still lives a
I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail,
pine, evolution,
thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I
came back to mutt.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (P
Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) began
> slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE which is about
> as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was.
KDE3 still lives and KMail is still as usable as before ... even better as
bugs
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:08:45AM -0400, Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:43:15 +
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > Version 4.7 of the kernel contains a fix, which only required changes to
> > one source file, so I assume it's a question of back porting that fix into
> > the Je
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:43:15 +
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Version 4.7 of the kernel contains a fix, which only required changes to
> one source file, so I assume it's a question of back porting that fix into
> the Jessie version of the kernel. I might take a look at trying that and
> submit a pat
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 at 10:21, Neal P. Murphy
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200
> Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > The attack is also useless if the attacker can't spoof the source IP
> > address. Routers in corporate environments usually block this by design
> or
> > due to VLAN. For that
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200
No Spam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So it is 12 years later;
>
> has someone found something working?
>
> greets
>
> J
More years ago, BeOS' email client was perfect for me. It use separate files
and made very liberal use of BFS' equivalent of attributes to sort and
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200
Frederic Marchal wrote:
> The attack is also useless if the attacker can't spoof the source IP
> address. Routers in corporate environments usually block this by design or
> due to VLAN. For that reason, the attack can't come from the same LAN to
> bypass the
No Spam writes:
> So it is 12 years later;
To what event are you referring? Your message's header has no standard
“In-Reply-To” field, so it apparently is not composed as a reply.
> has someone found something working?
I hope you can find an email client that correctly preserves the thread
of
Hi,
So it is 12 years later;
has someone found something working?
greets
J
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> The hole needs to be fixed.
AMEN
On 2016-08-28 23:24 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> I noticed that Linux kernel 3.16.x is LTS at kernel.org.
>
> Will Debian 8 switch to to kernel.org's LTS version or will it stay with
> Ubuntu's version of that kernel?
The former, because Ubuntu no longer maintains the 3.16 kernel.
Actually,
Hi,
I noticed that Linux kernel 3.16.x is LTS at kernel.org.
Will Debian 8 switch to to kernel.org's LTS version or will it stay with
Ubuntu's version of that kernel?
Kind regards
Georgi
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Opinion Outpost want your opinions so that they can make products you?ll love
even more, and they?re going to pay you for it. Opinion Outpost is the ultimate
win-win! The more surveys you take, the more opportunities you?ll h
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200 Frederic Marchal
wrote:
> The requirements are:
>
> * TCP connection,
> * long-lived,
> * unencrypted,
> * long silences.
>
> I'll add that the protocol must allow the server to initiate data
> sending with only one packet (such as news pushed from the server
>
On Saturday, August 27, 2016 07:34:33 PM Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Brian writes:
> > Even if it works?
>
> It is a really good idea to check the contents of the PPA, and make sure
> it doesn't bring in nonstandard versions of system libraries. I don't
> remember ever having been burned by a PPA spe
On Friday 26 August 2016 23:11:23 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday 26 August 2016 11:04:04 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > According to:
> > >
> > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5696
> > >
> > > Wheezy a
On 2016-08-27, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
are given at x [1].
>> ^
>> |
>> |
>> What happened here-| ? The link has disappeared, Censorship at work?
>
> Maybe some intermediate processing performed by openmailbox.org,
>
There is no [1] on t
19 matches
Mail list logo
