On 28/07/16 06:56 PM, Norbert Kiszka wrote:
Dnia 2016-07-27, śro o godzinie 22:27 -0400, Frank McCormick pisze:
On 27/07/16 09:33 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 27/07/16 07:32 PM, Norbert Kiszka wrote:
Dnia 2016-07-27, śro o godzinie 19:10 -0400, Frank McCormick pisze:
On 27/07/16 06:41 PM, No
On 07/27/2016 05:19 PM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
Good afternoon, list,
I'm running an up-to-date Stretch operating system on a ca. 2010 Intel
laptop chipset. I noticed last night that the toolbars and menus
aren't rendering correctly. I dumped a PNG here:
I had a similar problem with an old Thinkp
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:36:39PM -0500, Spencer Gordon wrote:
> Hello! I have been considering buying a used IBM Thinkpad 860 laptop for a
> while now, and I was wondering if anyone had tested the PowerPC version of
> Debian on this machine. I would hope to install Debian, because I don't
> reall
Hello! I have been considering buying a used IBM Thinkpad 860 laptop for a
while now, and I was wondering if anyone had tested the PowerPC version of
Debian on this machine. I would hope to install Debian, because I don't
really want to use Windows HT, OS/2 Warp, IBM AIX, or Sun Solaris.
Thanks!
-S
Thank you, Siard. I'm grateful for help no matter who gives it! Here's
the PNG of the offending toolbar in LibreOffice:
https://s31.postimg.org/fanuugafv/Screenshot.png . As I hope the photo
shows, the buttons render correctly when they're hovered, but
otherwise whatever was on that part of the scr
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 5:36 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> Indeed; presumably it has decided association and authentication with
> the access point has successfully taken place and the interface has got
> an IP number. However, there does not appear to be routing between the
> interface and the AP.
When I
Dnia 2016-07-27, śro o godzinie 22:27 -0400, Frank McCormick pisze:
> On 27/07/16 09:33 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > On 27/07/16 07:32 PM, Norbert Kiszka wrote:
> >> Dnia 2016-07-27, śro o godzinie 19:10 -0400, Frank McCormick pisze:
> >>> On 27/07/16 06:41 PM, Norbert Kiszka wrote:
> Dnia 2
On Thursday 28 July 2016 22:15:52 Glenn English wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 2016, at 1:27 PM, David Wright
> > wrote:
> >
> > The answer may lie in the logs. Mine contains the lines
> >
> > 2016/07/28 07:35:36 :: Setting false IP... ←--
>
> Ah! They set an IP that will get to the DHC
On Thursday 28 July 2016 20:18:38 Brian wrote:
> And if they did it could just as well be wicd (NM) as NM (wicd).
Indeed. I take as much care not to have NM on the computer with wicd as vice
versa. In that saga you helped with so signally, you may have noticed that I
tried both several times -
On Thursday 28 July 2016 15:43:43 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> (Please don't top-post. Trim the quotes and reply below the quote you
> are referring to. Thanks.)
Jochem - Steve is blind. Many (Most? All??)blind people find bottom posting
and trimming very difficult. He is already putting paragraph
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 1:27 PM, David Wright wrote:
>
> The answer may lie in the logs. Mine contains the lines
>
> 2016/07/28 07:35:36 :: Setting false IP... ←--
Ah! They set an IP that will get to the DHCP server. I assume that the AP will
send out something on the Ethern
I Added to EOF of /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf:
options snd_bt87x index=-2
options snd-hda-intel index=0
options snd-usb-audio index=1 vid=0x046d pid=0x081b
options snd_bt87x index=2
options snd-usb-audio index=3 vid=0x0d8c pid=0x0008
to accomodate 4 s
On 2016-07-25 18:53, Glenn English wrote:
> What does "Verifying access point association" mean, and what do you
> do to make it OK?
On Thu 28 Jul 2016 at 13:03:13 (-0600), Glenn English wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 2016, at 5:36 AM, Brian wrote:
> > It is wpa_supplicant which does the association and a
On Thu 28 Jul 2016 at 15:01:14 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 28 July 2016 14:35:09 Mike McGinn wrote:
> >
> > I had some trouble with wicd which I cured by making sure that network
> > manager was not running. Make sure NM is stopped and does not start.
>
> ... by uninstalling it.
No, b
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> Don't think so. NM, IIRC, implies Gnome, […]
>
> NACK
>
> I run NM without any of the big desktop environments.
OK. I remember incorrectly, or I got some bad info.
But I still think that's not the problem -- there's no NM around her
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 5:36 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> Indeed; presumably it has decided association and authentication with
> the access point has successfully taken place and the interface has got
> an IP number. However, there does not appear to be routing between the
> interface and the AP.
Wicd '
On 07/28/2016 11:31 AM, Alan McConnell wrote:
Have you started it in "safe-mode"? Mo problems with it running sid and
chrome directly installed from google. Ric
I have to call chromium from the command-line. I have just
tried 'chromium -safe-mode &'. It runs fine for a wh
Glenn English:
> > On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Mike McGinn
> > wrote:
> >
> > I had some trouble with wicd which I cured by making sure that
> > network manager was not running. Make sure NM is stopped and does
> > not start.
>
> Don't think so. NM, IIRC, implies Gnome, […]
NACK
I run NM with
Damn, I hit send without checking send to:
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Networking nonfunctional on 8.0
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:46:19 -0400
From: Ric Moore
To: Steve Matzura
On 07/28/2016 04:44 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWadd
Le 28/07/2016 à 11:26, Reco a écrit :
Check your Ethernet cable. NO-CARRIER either means that the cable is
unplugged from your NIC, or from whenever other end of the cable should
be plugged to, or the cable itself is damaged.
Or the internet port is damaged, or the remote port is damaged or di
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Mike McGinn wrote:
>
> I had some trouble with wicd which I cured by making sure that network
> manager was not running. Make sure NM is stopped and does not start.
Don't think so. NM, IIRC, implies Gnome, and my GUI is XFCD. There's already no
NM anywhere.
--
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:50:36PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 07/27/2016 05:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> >The rest of us aren't having the problem, so it must be something in Alan's
> >personal set-up or config files. Having said which, I do find that Google
> >Chrome is currently eating memory
(Please don't top-post. Trim the quotes and reply below the quote you
are referring to. Thanks.)
Steve Matzura:
> I am running 8.0; 8.5 is out. Came out on June 24.
You are right. I missed that the point release was labelled 8.5.
As Lisi said: you do not need to do anything special to upgrade f
On Thursday 28 July 2016 14:36:54 Steve Matzura wrote:
> I am running 8.0; 8.5 is out. Came out on June 24. Are you saying I
> should wait for 9 to become stable release and then upgrade to that
> version? I thought by going to 8.5 would be a good idea. Maybe not?
You should upgrade regularly to g
On Thursday 28 July 2016 14:35:09 Mike McGinn wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 07:36 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 22:36:01 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What does "Verifying access point association" mean
> >>
> >> After some lo
On Thu 28 Jul 2016 at 09:36:55 (-0400), Steve Matzura wrote:
> That article talks about upgrading from 7 (Weezy) to 8 (Jessie). I am
> already on 8--8.0 specifically. I was thinking of updating, maybe
> upgrade is the wrong term, to 8.5.
Read my other post, but I should have included this referenc
Yes. While I was waiting for a reply, I did try another, and either
the connector has gone bad, or some other thing, because that seems to
have been the problem. Very odd that it would fail in the manner which
it did, just died in the middle of the day.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:26:16 +0300, you wrot
On Thu 28 Jul 2016 at 05:21:59 (-0400), Steve Matzura wrote:
> Should I follow the standard procedure--edit sources.list to include
> the DVD drive (if it's not there already), then 'apt-get upgrade'
> followed by 'apt-get full-upgrade'?
There are some great answers accumulating in this thread, bu
That article talks about upgrading from 7 (Weezy) to 8 (Jessie). I am
already on 8--8.0 specifically. I was thinking of updating, maybe
upgrade is the wrong term, to 8.5.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:38:12 +0300, you wrote:
>Steve Matzura [2016-07-28 05:21:59-04] wrote:
>
>> Should I follow the standar
I am running 8.0; 8.5 is out. Came out on June 24. Are you saying I
should wait for 9 to become stable release and then upgrade to that
version? I thought by going to 8.5 would be a good idea. Maybe not?
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:34:01 +0200, you wrote:
>Steve Matzura:
>>
>> Should I follow the stan
On 07/28/2016 07:36 AM, Brian wrote:
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 22:36:01 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Glenn English wrote:
What does "Verifying access point association" mean
After some looking around, I found that a failure in that phase of
connecting means that wi
On 2016-07-28 04:21, Steve Matzura wrote:
Should I follow the standard procedure--edit sources.list to include
the DVD drive (if it's not there already), then 'apt-get upgrade'
followed by 'apt-get full-upgrade'?
When I make any changes in the sources.list file, I have found
that the changes do
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 22:36:01 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> > On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> >
> > What does "Verifying access point association" mean
>
> After some looking around, I found that a failure in that phase of
> connecting means that wicd tried to ping the AP 1
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016, at 14:29, Brian wrote:
>
> ...
> for one machine, probably ancient but still doing a useful
> job, I have
>
> model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
>
> That's not enough, is it? What has to done to determine its processor
> class?
>
> I'm happy enou
Steve Matzura [2016-07-28 05:21:59-04] wrote:
> Should I follow the standard procedure--edit sources.list to include
> the DVD drive (if it's not there already), then 'apt-get upgrade'
> followed by 'apt-get full-upgrade'?
I think it's useful to follow the "standard procedure", that is the
releas
Steve Matzura:
>
> Should I follow the standard procedure--edit sources.list to include
> the DVD drive (if it's not there already), then 'apt-get upgrade'
> followed by 'apt-get full-upgrade'?
What do you mean with "8.5"? Debian jessie is version 8, Debian stretch
ussupposed to be version 9, I th
Should I follow the standard procedure--edit sources.list to include
the DVD drive (if it's not there already), then 'apt-get upgrade'
followed by 'apt-get full-upgrade'?
Hi.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:44:09AM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
> 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state DOWN group default qlen 1000
Check your Ethernet cable. NO-CARRIER either means that the cable is
unplugged from your NIC, or from whenever other end of the cable should
be plu
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:46:23 +0200, you wrote:
>Le 27/07/2016 à 15:43, Steve Matzura a écrit :
>> My 8.0 system has been running great up until Monday evening when
>> users started reporting they were unable to connect. Sure enough, I
>> couldn't even connect from my LAN. I rebooted, looked at mes
Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Lisi: is there some other place where I can upload a PNG file and have
> it display/transfer properly? Other than Instagram where I don't have
> an account?
I'm not Lisi, but this one is especially meant for forums, therefore
rather suitable IMO: https://postimage.org/
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Now to your issue. You said you wanted time based clean-up (remove files
> older then 30 days) but *not* remove them on boot.
>
> You've created a file /etc/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf which overrides the
> default that is shipped in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf
> So far so good. Wh
41 matches
Mail list logo
