John Hasler wrote:
> Charlie writes:
>> Was Canada conquered by the British
>
> Yes. They took it from the French.
>
>> and did they have a treaty with Canada or did Canada make a treaty
>> with the Brits?
>
> The British parliament passed a number of acts dealing with the
> governance of Cana
Following reportbug's instructions, since I don't know exactly what
package caused the problem, I'm mailing this list.
I'm running testing and tonight I upgraded as usual. Soon after, the
FontAwesome symbols U+f176 (fa-long-arrow-up) and U+f175
(fa-long-arrow-down) stopped rendering properly in so
On 03/29/2016 01:08 PM, Alan McConnell wrote:
... The _many_ install attempts crashed at random points ...
And now I'm meandering, for I don't know what further information to give, that
will help the members here to make further suggestions. But I shall be grateful
for any help I receive.
Bac
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:04:01 -0500 John Hasler sent:
> Charlie writes:
> > Was Canada conquered by the British
>
> Yes. They took it from the French.
>
> > and did they have a treaty with Canada or did Canada make a treaty
> > with the Brits?
>
> The British parliament passed a number of a
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:39:30 -0500 John Hasler sent:
> deloptes writes:
> > The fact is that the "basic law" imposed by the Allies after 1945 (I
> > think it was signed 49) is still the official constitution of
> > Germany.
>
> By this line of reasoning Canada is still a British colony.
What r
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:39:30 -0500 John Hasler sent:
> deloptes writes:
> > The fact is that the "basic law" imposed by the Allies after 1945 (I
> > think it was signed 49) is still the official constitution of
> > Germany.
>
> By this line of reasoning Canada is still a British colony.
What r
Charlie writes:
> Was Canada conquered by the British
Yes. They took it from the French.
> and did they have a treaty with Canada or did Canada make a treaty
> with the Brits?
The British parliament passed a number of acts dealing with the
governance of Canada. These form the "basic law" of th
deloptes writes:
> The fact is that the "basic law" imposed by the Allies after 1945 (I
> think it was signed 49) is still the official constitution of Germany.
By this line of reasoning Canada is still a British colony.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
John Hasler wrote:
> deloptes writes:
>> It's not conspiracy - just check the facts. There is nothing signed
>> from USA part.
>
> Nonsense. See
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Treaty
> and
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Plus_Four_Agreement
See my comment to Terence.
These materia
Terence wrote:
> As for "Germany is still officially occupied by the USA" I rather think
> that they would disagree! The military occupation of Germany ended in
> 1945...
What ended in your mind might not be true.
There is no piece treaty with Germany and USA. There is the so called 2+4
treaty (1
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 16:08:19 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote:
> Long before I joined this List, I purchased a DVD and a thumb device from
> LinuxCollections. The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm guessing,
> the thumb device contained the rest.
You shouldn't have to guess; any OS should
deloptes writes:
> It's not conspiracy - just check the facts. There is nothing signed
> from USA part.
Nonsense. See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Treaty
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Plus_Four_Agreement
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>No help - but "Join the club". Been there, done that, got the tee shirt.
>Mine was a new computer and, after over a day of tearing my hair out, trying
>again, trying differently,and re-downloading etc. etc., I installed Ubuntu
>MATE (how are the mighty fallen!!), just to
a...@his.com wrote:
>Long before I joined this List, I purchased a DVD and a thumb device from
>LinuxCollections. The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm guessing,
>the thumb device contained the rest.
>
>I kept the same partitions that I had had on my old squeezy install.
>the first was
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> ISTR that occupation was over with the re-unification of Germany in
> October 1990.
Yes for the Soviet Union but not for the USA ;-)
It's not conspiracy - just check the facts. There is nothing signed from USA
part.
Sorry - I was also surprised
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:13:54PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 21:08:19 Alan McConnell wrote:
> > The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm guessing,
> > the thumb device contained the rest.
>
> It doesn't look like it. It looks as though the USB key only has the fi
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 21:08:19 Alan McConnell wrote:
> The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm guessing,
> the thumb device contained the rest.
It doesn't look like it. It looks as though the USB key only has the first
DVD on it. To get all the DVDs you need to buy all the DVDs - bu
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 21:08:19 Alan McConnell wrote:
> Long before I joined this List, I purchased a DVD and a thumb device from
> LinuxCollections. The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm
> guessing, the thumb device contained the rest.
>
> I kept the same partitions that I had had on
Long before I joined this List, I purchased a DVD and a thumb device from
LinuxCollections. The DVD contained the first Jessie DVD, and, I'm guessing,
the thumb device contained the rest.
I kept the same partitions that I had had on my old squeezy install.
the first was /boot, the fifth was /, th
I am running Jessie on a toshiba laptop with these specs
Hardware: i7 5500u
Graphics: Intel HD graphics 5500
Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4 (2016-02-29)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
I had to turn of power saving options (the screen can still be blanked
after a few minutes but hibern
Software center in Stretch/Sid has shuting down i try report in
Reportbug but i can't
Welcome
software center has shuting down in sid but i can't reporting it in
reportbug
Hi,
Jan Gregor wrote:
> is it possible to correct the files via pseudo-overwrite
If the BD-R is already formatted for Pseudo-Overwrite and if you
can determine the block range of the damaged files, then this might
be possible.
The block range could be determined by
path_to_file=...
xorriso -
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:38:07 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 29/03/16 17:20, Reco wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:08:01 +0100
> > Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/03/16 16:25, Reco wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:44:16 +0100
> >>> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >>
2016-03-29 18:08 keltezéssel, Tony van der Hoff írta:
> I guess, if it never goes down, it can never come up
If you modified your /etc/network interfaces when the network was up and
running then you can face similar messages. If you want to modify your
network settings then the proper order is
-
On 29/03/16 17:20, Reco wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:08:01 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 29/03/16 16:25, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:44:16 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
And - you have yet another default gateway for eth1.
No wonder that the kernel refuses to add th
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:08:01 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 29/03/16 16:25, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:44:16 +0100
> > Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >>> And - you have yet another default gateway for eth1.
> >>> No wonder that the kernel refuses to add the same rout
On 29/03/16 16:25, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:44:16 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
And - you have yet another default gateway for eth1.
No wonder that the kernel refuses to add the same route second time.
Reco
Thanks, Reco.
I've now commented out that line for eth1, but
Hi.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:44:16 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> > And - you have yet another default gateway for eth1.
> > No wonder that the kernel refuses to add the same route second time.
> >
> > Reco
> >
>
> Thanks, Reco.
> I've now commented out that line for eth1, but I still ge
On 29/03/16 15:34, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Mar 29 10:15:06 tony-lx networking[21563]: Configuring network
interfaces...RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Mar 29 10:15:06 tony-lx networking[21563]: Failed to bring up eth1.
Mar 29 10
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>Mar 29 10:15:06 tony-lx networking[21563]: Configuring network
>>interfaces...RTNETLINK answers: File exists
>>Mar 29 10:15:06 tony-lx networking[21563]: Failed to bring up eth1.
>>Mar 29 10:15:06 tony-lx networking[
Hello,
I'm currently experimenting with a VM running Debian 8 on top of a ZFS
root, and noticed a kernel panic occurring on shutdown. The bug happens
only when
* /boot (ext3) is mounted
* the machine is shutting down
It does not happen when
* /boot is unmounted OR
* the machine is rebooting
My qu
Very quick reply.Thanks
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 10 germinal, an CCXXIV, Bhasker C V a écrit :
>> I have been trying to find out where does the grubx64.efi come from ?
>> I have a system which is EFI boot. I can see that after grub-install
>> /boot/efi/
Le decadi 10 germinal, an CCXXIV, Bhasker C V a écrit :
> I have been trying to find out where does the grubx64.efi come from ?
> I have a system which is EFI boot. I can see that after grub-install
> /boot/efi/x86_64-efi/core.efi is created and this is copied as
> efi/EFI/debian/grubx64.efi
>
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 29/03/16 14:00, Brian wrote:
> >On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 13:37:19 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >>On 29/03/16 12:58, pedantsunited wrote:
> >>>On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 11:14:56 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Any c
Hi
I have been trying to find out where does the grubx64.efi come from ?
I have a system which is EFI boot. I can see that after grub-install
/boot/efi/x86_64-efi/core.efi is created and this is copied as
efi/EFI/debian/grubx64.efi
What I am failing to understand is where does this core.efi come
On 2016-03-28 at 15:15, Daniel Schröter wrote:
> I still have the problem. Someone else too?
The list of repositories which are known to have this problem is
available here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Sha1Removal
The only way for the problem to be fixed, short of reverting the
software f
On 29/03/16 14:00, Brian wrote:
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 13:37:19 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 29/03/16 12:58, pedantsunited wrote:
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 11:14:56 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Any chance of seeing /e/n/i?
Not until you explain what you're talking about
/etc/network/i
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 13:37:19 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 29/03/16 12:58, pedantsunited wrote:
> >On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 11:14:56 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >Any chance of seeing /e/n/i?
> >
> Not until you explain what you're talking about
/etc/network/interfaces
On 29/03/16 12:58, pedantsunited wrote:
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 11:14:56 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Any chance of seeing /e/n/i?
Not until you explain what you're talking about
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |
On Tue 29 Mar 2016 at 11:14:56 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Thanks, everybody for your very helpful replies ;)
>
> It is quite correct that the "deprecated" message has appeared since long
> before systemd. It is also true to say that this message no longer appears
> in Jessie. However, mayb
Hello,
I found that two files on formatted bd-r media cannot be read. Since few
hundred megabytes are left on medium and spare area is also not full, is it
possible to correct the files via pseudo-overwrite or new session ? First
method seems to me more natural, same is used when data written to
Hi Tony,
> What is the recommended way of restarting network services after, say,
> changing the parameters in /etc/network/interfaces?
>
> service networking restart doesn't seem to do the job properly.
Although that is the "proper way" I have noticed that other services depending
on specific
On 28/03/16 10:49, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
What is the recommended way of restarting network services after, say,
changing the parameters in /etc/network/interfaces?
service networking restart doesn't seem to do the job properly.
Thanks, everybody for your very helpful replies ;)
It is quit
Hello,
El 29 de marzo de 2016 9:16:09 CEST, Sergei Petrunin
escribió:
>Thanks for response!
>
>Unfortunately, I have to report that doing
>
>sudo install-grub /dev/sda#/dev/sda is by device for hard-drive
>with
>lvm, may be I need some specific options here?
>sudo upgrade-grub
>
>do not cure
Debian has the very informative and advisable package debian-reference-en (also
available for some other languages). After installation its contents becomes
available via menu as "Debian reference". Chapter 5, "Network setup" has a lot
of answers dependent on the administrator's choices (which mean
Hi.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:21:12 +0100
Joe wrote:
> >
> > service networking restart
> >
> > or, if you are also running network-manager, possibly
> >
> > service network-manger restart
> >
> > Very similar to the syntax for /etc/init.d - you're restarting a
> > running service
> >
>
Thanks for response!
Unfortunately, I have to report that doing
sudo install-grub /dev/sda#/dev/sda is by device for hard-drive with
lvm, may be I need some specific options here?
sudo upgrade-grub
do not cure boot for 4.4.0 kernel - same problem persists, still 4.3.0
kernel (in "Advanced GR
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:01:09 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:23:42AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 29/03/2016 12:34 AM, Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 28 Mar 2016 at 10:49:14 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> > >
> > >> What is the recommended way o
49 matches
Mail list logo
