Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 28 December 2015 02:30:44 Sven Hartge wrote: > Sven Hartge wrote: > > But I see there is a package named libhal1-flash available from > > Christian Marillat in his deb-multimedia.org repository. It contains the > > code from https://github.com/cshorler/hal-flash. > > Hmm, libhal1-flash i

Re: Need a calculator that knows about coulombs

2015-12-27 Thread Gener Badenas
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > Do we have such a beast? > > Thanks. > > There might be some projects in github that does this. > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Nate Bargmann wrote: > Does the flashplugin-nonfree package in Jessie not work for you? It is > a plugin for Iceweasel/Firefox. Or do you need something else? > See also: https://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer/ The problem is not the Flash plugin, but the DRM code that is loaded from Adobe, whi

Re: KTorrent: Turn off computer when finished

2015-12-27 Thread Allan Aguilar
On 12/28/2015 06:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Allan Aguilar > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a way to set up KTorrent in a way that the computer turns off >> when all downloads are complete? > > Hi Allan, > > If you go to the "View" menu, there should be a

Re: KTorrent: Turn off computer when finished

2015-12-27 Thread Brandon Vincent
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Allan Aguilar wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to set up KTorrent in a way that the computer turns off > when all downloads are complete? Hi Allan, If you go to the "View" menu, there should be a "Plugins" option. One of the plugins is "Shutdown" that does wha

KTorrent: Turn off computer when finished

2015-12-27 Thread Allan Aguilar
Hello, Is there a way to set up KTorrent in a way that the computer turns off when all downloads are complete? -- Allan Aguilar allanagui...@riseup.net https://twitter.com/ailaqua signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:33:56 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:57:41 -0500 (EST), Nicolas George wrote: >> ... >> I noticed that LILO seems to be actually capable >> of finding the sectors for files on LVM. > > In the general case, the sectors of a file on an LVM2 logical

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Nate Bargmann
Lisi, Does the flashplugin-nonfree package in Jessie not work for you? It is a plugin for Iceweasel/Firefox. Or do you need something else? See also: https://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer/ - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Sven Hartge wrote: > But I see there is a package named libhal1-flash available from > Christian Marillat in his deb-multimedia.org repository. It contains the > code from https://github.com/cshorler/hal-flash. Hmm, libhal1-flash is only available for Stretch and Sid. I wonder why. Maybe you ca

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 28 December 2015 00:59:38 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Lisi Reisz wrote: >>> Is there any way I can install HAL in Jessie? Or do I need to wipe >>> it, and reinstall Wheezy on the box on which I need HAL? >> The real question is: "Why do you need HAL?" > Because, crimin

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 28 December 2015 00:59:38 Sven Hartge wrote: > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Is there any way I can install HAL in Jessie? Or do I need to wipe > > it, and reinstall Wheezy on the box on which I need HAL? > > The real question is: "Why do you need HAL?" > > Grüße, > Sven. Because, criminal off

Re: HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Lisi Reisz wrote: > Is there any way I can install HAL in Jessie? Or do I need to wipe > it, and reinstall Wheezy on the box on which I need HAL? The real question is: "Why do you need HAL?" Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

HAL

2015-12-27 Thread Lisi Reisz
Is there any way I can install HAL in Jessie? Or do I need to wipe it, and reinstall Wheezy on the box on which I need HAL? Lisi

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Sven Hartge a écrit : > Pascal Hambourg wrote: >>> Le duodi 2 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Sven Hartge a écrit : > And this is why I love the GPT. There is a defined space for the bootloader to be and no nether region of swirly unknowness between the MBR and the start of the first partition.

Re: Dovecot Problems?

2015-12-27 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Presuming you're running stable, I've got 1:2.2.13-12~deb8u1 running and login from Android clients (K-9, Android 5 and 6) works just fine. I would suggest using tcpdump to see how far the packets are getting. Also, IMAP/SSL (as opposed to IMAP + STARTTLS) runs on port 993—make sure you're not bloc

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Nicolas George a écrit : >> Le duodi 2 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Sven Hartge a écrit : >>> And this is why I love the GPT. There is a defined space for the >>> bootloader to be and no nether region of swirly unknowness between >>> the MBR and the start of the first partition. >

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > I repeat : the point is not MBR/MSDOS vs GPT. It is that the GRUB > installer handles *specially* one type of partition which exists only in > GPT style : "BIOS Boot" aka "bios_grub". > > Are you talking about the installer code run by gr

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Nicolas George a écrit : > > In the meantime, I can tell what I saw in the code, and this is: GRUB makes > no difference between MBR-style partitions (that it calls internally > "msdos") and GPT. I repeat : the point is not MBR/MSDOS vs GPT. It is that the GRUB installer handles *specially* one t

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > *Cough* > At least it was supposed to. The more I mess with UEFI implementations, > the more I feel dubious about its real advantages. Six messages ago, I wrote "or would be if it was correctly implemented by vendors"; you read it since y

Re: Digital signatures

2015-12-27 Thread Teemu Likonen
Anthony Mapes [2015-12-27 09:03:22-05] wrote: > I do have one question about the MIME version, though. I've seen > mailing lists that add a footer to each message (in the form of a > signature). With inline PGP, this footer gets appended after the > signature block, and everything is wonderful. Wo

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 27 December 2015 09:30:38 Nicolas George wrote: > Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > > There was nothing confusing in Sven's message until you mentionned > > UEFI in response to "I love the GPT". Why did you start talking > > about UEFI ? > > For the early stage

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Nicolas George a écrit : > Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : >> There was nothing confusing in Sven's message until you mentionned UEFI >> in response to "I love the GPT". Why did you start talking about UEFI ? > > For the early stage of booting, there is no difference betw

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > There was nothing confusing in Sven's message until you mentionned UEFI > in response to "I love the GPT". Why did you start talking about UEFI ? For the early stage of booting, there is no difference between MBR-style partitions (it is m

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Nicolas George a écrit : > Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : >> You are confusing GPT (partition table format) and UEFI (firmware and >> boot interface). > > Quite the contrary, I am trying to de-confuse by using exactly the correct > terms. There was nothing confusing in

Re: Digital signatures

2015-12-27 Thread Anthony Mapes
On 12/27/2015 02:59 AM, Teemu Likonen wrote: > > If we change the subject to digital signatures I think that having the > signature in a separate MIME part is the modern way. You had the PGP > signature in the body of the message (and it's fine with me and my mail > client) but separate MIME parts

Re: Recovering data from a Raid 1Sata HD

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
to...@tuxteam.de a écrit : > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:41:00AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > >> Or do I have to first create a (failed) array with mdadm ? > > For RAID 1 it shouldn't be necessary, AFAIR You cannot mount directly a RAID 1 partition with format 1.1 or 1.2 because the RAID sup

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 7 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > You are confusing GPT (partition table format) and UEFI (firmware and > boot interface). Quite the contrary, I am trying to de-confuse by using exactly the correct terms. > Can you tell more ? AFAIK, there is no equivalent to the "BIOS b

Re: Recovering data from a Raid 1Sata HD

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Felix Miata a écrit : > > A RAID1 partition normally cannot be mounted as an sdX# device. It can if the RAID superblock is located at the end of the partition. I.e. the superblock format is 0.9 (obsolete) or 1.0. However if the format is 1.1 or 1.2 (default), the superblock is located at or near

Re: Attempt to Move Root

2015-12-27 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Nicolas George a écrit : > Le duodi 2 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Sven Hartge a écrit : >> And this is why I love the GPT. There is a defined space for the >> bootloader to be and no nether region of swirly unknowness between the >> MBR and the start of the first partition. Note that current partition tool

Digital signatures

2015-12-27 Thread Teemu Likonen
Anthony Mapes [2015-12-24 10:38:28-05] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be > good and bad to include in signatures? If we change the subject to digital signatures I think that having the signature in a s