On Fri, 8 May 2015 17:15:51 -0400
German wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 22:05:40 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> > > It's happened when I was
> > > installing Lubuntu.
> >
> > Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
> >
> > http://en.wikiped
On 5/8/2015 5:28 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
Not quite. /dev/sda2/ is not a directory; it's a device node. Since
/dev/sda2 is mounted to / (the root filesystem), the correct
equivalent to this command would be: ddrescue /dev/sdd /dev/sdc
/ddre
From my keyboard:
I have been looking through the man pages for: apt-get, apt-get upgrade,
but I'm certain I don't understand how I might hold a package for a
while?
Anyone who can and is inclined to help, might assist me for the whole
testing cycle in this case with their adv
On 5/8/2015 10:20 AM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of
failed drive and transfer it as a .
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Sven Hartge wrote:
>> - how to pin pacakges to a specific version
> I am not a fan of pinning. Generally people try to use it to keep a
> mixed system.
Pinning in this context was not meant to have a mixed system but as a
method to keep a specific version of a package out o
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> That's what I got:
> >>>
> >>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
> >>> NAME MAJ
On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>>> That's what I got:
>>>
>>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
>>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>>> sda 8:00 119.2G 0 disk
>>> ├─s
Am 09.05.2015 um 01:32 schrieb Dan Ritter:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=selinux-policy-default;dist=unstable
>
> See the bugs marked Grave, Serious, and indeed most of the
> Important and some of the Unclassified bugs.
>
> It may be that someone will someday get a default s
On Fri, 8 May 2015 17:22:11 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> German wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > I think I read that you have one identically sized drive, yes? I
> > > am not sure where you are sitting with regards to the other
> > > suggestions. But at the least I would make one good backup as
>
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100 Lisi Reisz
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
> >>
> >> They are *your
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:18:30PM -0500, Spencer Minear wrote:
> I installed the new Jessie version of debian on a VirtualBox system, and
> had no problems with the installation. Because I wanted to do work with
> the SELinux policy I wanted to first make sure that the system would run
> with SE
Bob Proulx wrote:
> ddrescue if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/sdY /media/usb1
>
> Where /media/usb1 is an example of a mounted usb storage device.
> Replace that string with the mount point of the usb device mounted on
> your host system.
Obviously I made a mistake there. Not to the mount directory but to
German wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I think I read that you have one identically sized drive, yes? I am
> > not sure where you are sitting with regards to the other suggestions.
> > But at the least I would make one good backup as soon as possible.
> > And it seems that possibly you have the cap
On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100 Lisi Reisz
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
>>
>>> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
>>
>> They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a
>> suitable disk, i would at
On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> > Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
>
> They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a
> suitable disk, i would at least dd them first onto that.
>
> Lisi
>
>
That's
On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a suitable disk,
i would at least dd them first onto that.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:11:03 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 06:07 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
> >>> duplicate?
On 05/08/2015 at 06:07 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
>>> duplicate? After I duplicate the drive, what are my next steps?
>
>> With the drive
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> >>> The Wanderer wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:
I installed the new Jessie version of debian on a VirtualBox system, and
had no problems with the installation. Because I wanted to do work with
the SELinux policy I wanted to first make sure that the system would run
with SE Linux to provide a platform on which to experiment with the policy.
I o
On Fri, 8 May 2015 22:05:40 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> > It's happened when I was
> > installing Lubuntu.
>
> Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
>
> Lisi
>
>
You are philoso
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:00:13 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> German wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > There is an idea that I didn't see proposed as I read through this
> > > thread. If one had three same sized drives then there is another
> > > possibility.
> >
> > Problem I have now is the lack o
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> It's happened when I was
> installing Lubuntu.
Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:51:17 German wrote:
> Problem I have now is the lack of money. I simply don't have money now
> to buy yet another drive.
Well, you can use what you have got and risk it. Or you can wait a bit.
Assuming that the financial situation might ease.
But I would think carefully
German wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > There is an idea that I didn't see proposed as I read through this
> > thread. If one had three same sized drives then there is another
> > possibility.
>
> Problem I have now is the lack of money. I simply don't have money now
> to buy yet another drive. I
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:51:20 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 04:34 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400 The Wanderer
> > wrote:
>
> >> What leads you to conclude that the drive is OK and the filesystem
> >> is what is bad? What errors are you seeing, in what
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:40:02 German wrote:
> Well, data is pretty much precious to me. Studios flacs of rare and
> hard to get music.
Then I would take at least one copy, preferably two, and work on a copy.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 05/08/2015 at 04:34 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400 The Wanderer
> wrote:
>> What leads you to conclude that the drive is OK and the filesystem
>> is what is bad? What errors are you seeing, in what situations?
>
> Error mounting /dev/sdc1 at /media/spore/FreeAgent GoF
On Fri, 8 May 2015 14:41:24 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> > > I think Wanderer may be overstating the problem a little. If the
> > > two drives are exactly the same size, you can use ddrescue to
> > > duplicate the failed drive onto the new drive (ddrescue
>
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I run approx on one of my local jessie machines. The approx installation
> is strictly by using the approx deb, which includes a weekly run of
> approx-gc , which should just clean out the local repository of debs that
> are no longer useful. But approx-gc has started reporti
The Wanderer wrote:
> Gary Dale wrote:
> > I think Wanderer may be overstating the problem a little. If the two
> > drives are exactly the same size, you can use ddrescue to duplicate
> > the failed drive onto the new drive (ddrescue if=/dev/sdb
> > of=/dev/sdc). However this will limit you to rec
On Fri, 8 May 2015 21:35:56 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 21:09:42 German wrote:
> > What will happen when I duplicate drive? Why is that failed drive is
> > failed and duplicated drive might be repairable? If it's
> > duplicated, it will be exactly the same, no?
>
> Yes, that
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:09:42 German wrote:
> What will happen when I duplicate drive? Why is that failed drive is
> failed and duplicated drive might be repairable? If it's duplicated, it
> will be exactly the same, no?
Yes, that is the point. If there is something wrong with the disk then eve
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 04:09 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
> >>> duplicate?
On 05/08/2015 at 04:09 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
>>> duplicate? After I duplicate the drive, what are my next steps?
>>
>> With the drive
Mark Allums wrote:
> I have some packages that did not install correctly. One in particular is
> giving me fits. It can't be upgraded. It can't be removed. It can't be
> reinstalled. It can't be reconfigured. The error message states that it is
> in an inconsistent state and needs to be reins
Sven Hartge wrote:
> If you know, how to pull yourself out of the mud, are able to file bug
> reports, read bug reports und know how to use apt-listchanges and
> apt-listbugs, _then_ you can use Sid. (Been doing that for over 15 years
> myself.)
(Chuckle.) I'm good to go. Specifically the reason
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> >>> The Wanderer wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:
Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
> > Why no LVM? Using LVM is the way I always do it because that allows
>
> I didn't have any particular reason to avoid LVM. I just tried if
> encrypted installation succeeds without it. Now that I tried with LVM,
> installation was simple and worked wi
David Christensen wrote:
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > On Partition settings screen, I choose Use as Ext2, Mount point /boot, and
> > Bootable flag on. Then I choose Done setting up the partition.
>
> Why ext2? I use ext4.
I always use and recommend ext2 for /boot. It avoids wasting space in
the
On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
wrote:
On 05/08/2
Marco Stoecker wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I am unable to recreate your problem on wheezy. I just now installed
> >...
> > Go back and double check everything.
>
> But what happens to the mailman site, if I disable listening on port 80?
> Will the mailman site still be available?
(Me rattles
On 05/08/2015 at 02:48 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400 The Wanderer
>> wrote:
>>> Yes, that's what I'd do in your situation. A 2.5TB drive should
>>> be more than enough; that would also let you store the
>>> sdb_failed.ddrescu
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/0
On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two dri
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two drives,
> >>>
No.
With ddrescue, you do not (want to) create a new filesystem directly on
the new device.
What you want to do is create a filesystem _image_, in a file which is
stored on the new device.
Step-by-step, what you do is:
* Create a filesystem on your "good" drive (/dev/sdc). You can use any
fi
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>>> Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two drives,
>>> failed and a spare. Both are 2TB in size. Failed drive probably
>>> has 1.6
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
> >>> Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save
> >>> .img file. Is
I run approx on one of my local jessie machines. The approx installation
is strictly by using the approx deb, which includes a weekly run of
approx-gc , which should just clean out the local repository of debs that
are no longer useful. But approx-gc has started reporting I/O errors.
I suppose I c
On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
>>> Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save
>>> .img file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot
>>> of failed drive a
Hi,
On 05/08/2015 09:00 AM, Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 00:50:24 -0400
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 08 May 2015 00:36:51 bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 May 2015 00:03:22 -0400
>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>
>>> i just finished wrestling with NFS set-up problems myself.
>
On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
> > Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
> > file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of
> > failed drive and transfer it as a .img file to a spare drive,
>
On 2015-05-08, Stephen Allen wrote:
>>
>> apt-cache search "update manager"
>>
>> Doesn't find anything that sounds right, either. What are you running?
>
> Perhaps he meant 'update-notifier' that's in Jessie?
>
curty@einstein:~$ apt-cache search update | grep manager | grep gnome
update-manage
On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of failed
drive and transfer it as a .img file to a spare drive, correct?
R-studio for linux can display files of failed drive ( Tes
Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of failed
drive and transfer it as a .img file to a spare drive, correct?
R-studio for linux can display files of failed drive ( TestDisk coudn't
do it ). So now I think
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:08:34PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 14:38:53 +0200
> Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
>
> > "So you have to check your "system update manager"'s network
> > settings." -> Where to do it? And where to setup how often do it the
> > update?
>
> Well, what _is_ t
* Petter Adsen [2015-05-08 13:03 +0200]:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 06:51:43 -0400
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > On Friday 08 May 2015 02:55:53 Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > That _is_ what you want, isn't it?
> >
> > root does not need write perms, but I do. If it takes root to do
> > something, that is
On Fri, 8 May 2015 14:38:53 +0200
Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> "So you have to check your "system update manager"'s network
> settings." -> Where to do it? And where to setup how often do it the
> update?
Well, what _is_ this update manager? Is it some Gnome thing? I know
that Ubuntu has something c
"So you have to check your "system update manager"'s network
settings." -> Where to do it? And where to setup how often do it the update?
"You can't install Debian binaries via apt-get. You can only install
packages like:
apt-get install " -> Sorry - Yes - I mean that too, but not
wrote correctly
Hi all. I have an HP pavillion dv6 6131tx laptop late 2011 laptop with Motorola
Bluetooth 3.0 hs adaptor. It works fine on Windows but not on Debian Jessie (64
bit gnome) (I have both windows and debian installed as dual boot). Bluetooth
menu shows on the panel. It also tries to search for devic
yeah I have also found this problem when I installed using Debian live usb but
when I installed via Debian DVD on USB the problem was gone. I suppose problem
is with the live usb installer. Also when I installed Debian on a virtual
machine in windows through Debian live, the videos played fine.
On Fri, 8 May 2015 06:51:43 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 02:55:53 Petter Adsen wrote:
> > That _is_ what you want, isn't it?
>
> root does not need write perms, but I do. If it takes root to do
> something, that is what the ssh -Y session as me, using sudo is for.
If you
On Friday 08 May 2015 02:55:53 Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 00:50:24 -0400
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 08 May 2015 00:36:51 bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 May 2015 00:03:22 -0400
> > >
> > > Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > Greetings all;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Next i
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Pierre Chausse wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to do an apt-get upgrade which I hadn't done for a while so it
> was a major update. Everything went well except that the installation
> cannot complete when it reaches the stage of configuring Grub. I tried
65 matches
Mail list logo
