2014-12-18 17:47 GMT+01:00 laurent debian :
> Hi all,
> when you have an error of apt-get
>>
>> Préparation du dépaquetage de .../systemd-sysv_215-8_amd64.deb ...
>> Dépaquetage de systemd-sysv (215-8) sur (215-7) ...
>> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
>
> which recomme
Reco writes:
>
>> The
>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED rule is only for stupid protocols like FTP, that
>> like to open new outbound connections in response to inbound requests.
>
> Not quite true. You forgot to take into account good old DNS, for
> example. Now, sure, DNS *is* stupid, but sshd relies on i
On 12/18/2014 07:46 PM, Nathan Olsen wrote:
I am trying to install Debian 7 on a machine running the E5300 chip. I
believe the amd64 is the correct choice but the system will not
recognize the disc, I've redone the first disc on another fresh disc
with no luck. I tried i386 and it installed fine
I am trying to install Debian 7 on a machine running the E5300 chip. I
believe the amd64 is the correct choice but the system will not
recognize the disc, I've redone the first disc on another fresh disc
with no luck. I tried i386 and it installed fine but then did not work
correctly. Other softwar
Mart van de Wege a écrit :
> Reco writes:
>
>> The simplest *working* solution is to use iptables this way:
>>
>> iptables -F INPUT
>> iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
>> iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
Too permissive. Allow only safe error types (i.e.
destination-unreachable, time-exceeded
On 12/18/14, laurent debian wrote:
> Hi all,
> when you have an error of apt-get
>> Préparation du dépaquetage de .../systemd-sysv_215-8_amd64.deb ...
>> Dépaquetage de systemd-sysv (215-8) sur (215-7) ...
>> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
>which recommends -f inst
Hi all,
when you have an error of apt-get
Préparation du dépaquetage de .../systemd-sysv_215-8_amd64.deb ...
Dépaquetage de systemd-sysv (215-8) sur (215-7) ...
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
which recommends -f install
which could not be fixed using it is there a k
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:35:31 +0100
Mart van de Wege wrote:
> Reco writes:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:39:18AM +0100, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> >> Britton Kerin writes:
> >>
> >> > I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
> >> >
> >> > No apache
I found a simple workaround which lets me keep grub, I have no other
OS'es installed that would require a mount and scan of all partitions:
tail /etc/default/grub -n 3
#prevent hanging on mount scans
GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
solves the issue for me.
Hope that helps others too ..
Marc Crom
Le 18.12.2014 18:13, Harry Putnam a écrit :
Setup: very new install of gentoo
When I restart ssh like so:
sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
I see very little output. Should it be more verbose?
,
|harry > sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
| Restarting ssh (via systemctl): ssh.service
`---
On Thu Dec 18, 2014 at 12:13:47 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup: very new install of gentoo
I suggest you ask for assistance on the gentoo mailing lists
in the future.
> I see very little output. Should it be more verbose?
No.
> Can I get more verbose output?
Yes.
systemctl statu
Harry Putnam writes:
> Setup: very new install of gentoo
TYPE ALERT:
Setup: not so new install of debian (jessie)
>
> When I restart ssh like so:
>
>sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
>
> I see very little output. Should it be more verbose?
>
> ,
> |harry > sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
Le 18.12.2014 06:08, Britton Kerin a écrit :
I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
No apache telnet ftp anything else.
What is the easiest way to achieve this? It came from a vendor with
a slew of package of all sorts, so I don't even know everything that
I want t
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> Le 18.12.2014 18:13, Harry Putnam a écrit :
>> Setup: very new install of gentoo
>
> Why not asking on a gentoo list, instead of a Debian one?
Sorry that setup info is wrong... it is a debian (jessie) install where I
get that brief output that makes me thin
Le 18.12.2014 18:13, Harry Putnam a écrit :
Setup: very new install of gentoo
Why not asking on a gentoo list, instead of a Debian one?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
ht
Setup: very new install of gentoo
When I restart ssh like so:
sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
I see very little output. Should it be more verbose?
,
|harry > sudo /etc/init.d/ssh restart
| Restarting ssh (via systemctl): ssh.service
`
Can I get more verbose output?
--
To UNSUB
Reco writes:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:39:18AM +0100, Mart van de Wege wrote:
>> Britton Kerin writes:
>>
>> > I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
>> >
>> > No apache telnet ftp anything else.
>> >
>> > What is the easiest way to achieve this? It came
Hi.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:39:18AM +0100, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> Britton Kerin writes:
>
> > I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
> >
> > No apache telnet ftp anything else.
> >
> > What is the easiest way to achieve this? It came from a vendor with
> > a sl
Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, 10:39:18 schrieb Mart van de Wege:
> Britton Kerin writes:
> > I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
> >
> > No apache telnet ftp anything else.
> >
> > What is the easiest way to achieve this? It came from a vendor with
> > a slew o
Britton Kerin writes:
> I have a system that I would like to make accessible only by ssh.
>
> No apache telnet ftp anything else.
>
> What is the easiest way to achieve this? It came from a vendor with
> a slew of package of all sorts, so I don't even know everything that
> I want to remove.
>
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I did some tests and got some additional information on the problem:
The token disappears also with the latest
openafs-{krb5,client,modules-dkms} from experimental. I did a test
setup with a clean jessie and upgraded it to unstable, followe
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:45:52 +0100
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
Hello Marko,
>On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:37:10 +0400
>German wrote:
>> 939. [ 34.070472] EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted. Opts:
>> errors=remount-ro
>What's sda2? Looks like it has errors. Do fsck on sda2.
sda2 is a drive partition. It has
On Jo, 18 dec 14, 00:37:30, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> If you want to transform your current system by removing
> externally-accessible services, I don't know of a strictly "easy" way,
> but if I wanted to do that on a machine under my control, what I'd do
> is:
>
> * Get a list of open ports by run
23 matches
Mail list logo