On 12/13/2014 3:43 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
What packages should I make sure are properly installed? Where can I
find a check list of what needs to be done. While I'm typing this I
realize I might need to become a member of a special access group, but
what is the name of the group? These are thi
On 20141213_1034-0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:47:55PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 12/12/2014 at 08:53 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> >
> > > When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it
> > > prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every
On Sunday, December 14, 2014 1:30:04 AM UTC+5:30, Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:53:48 -0500
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:48:41AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> Bret Busby wrote:
> > >>> Surely, it would have all been so much simpl
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 dec 14, 20:07:26, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > I don't know how effective this check is though. But I've NEVER
> > had a dirty partition reported in the past 8 years or so. The nice
> > thing is it is a very fast check. My 16GB / checked in
On 20141213_1643-0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I've been running Jessie on my deaktop from some time before the end
> of September. The last time a checked, which was quite a while ago,
> sound was working. But it might have been before I migrated from
> Wheezy to Jessie. Now realize I don't know wh
On 12/13/2014 at 02:45 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 dec 14, 20:07:26, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>> I don't know how effective this check is though. But I've NEVER
>> had a dirty partition reported in the past 8 years or so. The nice
>> thing is it is a very fast check. My 16GB / checked i
I've been running Jessie on my deaktop from some time before the end
of September. The last time a checked, which was quite a while ago,
sound was working. But it might have been before I migrated from
Wheezy to Jessie. Now realize I don't know what to do to get sound
working in Jessie. I got Jessi
Hello,
li...@onemanifest.net a écrit :
>
> I've setup static adressing for both NICs for ipv4 and ipv6 like this:
>
> # The primary LAN network interface
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.xx
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 192.168.1.1
>
>
Johann Spies a écrit :
>
> In the end I configured my partions to exclude the first 250Mb (/boot) from
> the raid and I could install Grub just to have a working system.
>
> It is not the best solution.
Obviously it's not. /boot should be on a RAID (and the bootloader
installed on all disks, whi
On 12 December 2014 at 12:07, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I’m trying to setup a multi-homed server with dual stack networking.
>
> I’ve setup static adressing for both NICs for ipv4 and ipv6 like this:
>
> # The primary LAN network interface
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> ad
On Vi, 12 dec 14, 20:07:26, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> I don't know how effective this check is though. But I've NEVER had a
> dirty partition reported in the past 8 years or so. The nice thing is it
> is a very fast check. My 16GB / checked in less than 5 seconds, and the
> 205GB /home in about 1
Thanks for your reply, Ron.
In the end I configured my partions to exclude the first 250Mb (/boot) from
the raid and I could install Grub just to have a working system.
It is not the best solution. The installer should work as expected.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love i
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:53:48 -0500
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:48:41AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Bret Busby wrote:
> >>> Surely, it would have all been so much simpler, if the original
> >>> poster in the thread, had put the question "To w
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Patrick Bartek [2014-12-12 20:07 -0800]:
>
> [...]> I prefer to manually fsck. Easier. I just do this as root
> before
> > shutdown -r now:
> >
> > touch /forcefsck
> >
> > On booting, fsck is run on all partitions, then the empty file
> > f
On 12/13/2014 12:26 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-12-13, Jape Person wrote:
Would anyone happen to know if plans are afoot to eliminate use of
/forcefsck?
I haven't the slightest idea, but I read somewhere recently that it
might be preferable to go the kernel parameter route, which avoids
writing
Bonjour,
On 13/12/14 19:21, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:47:02 +0100 Jerome BENOIT
> wrote:
>
>> Hola, this is an English Forum. Cheers, Jerome
>
> It pains me, especially at this Xmas time, to see this kind of
> un-helpful rebuke given without any sort of useful reply t
Please ask your question on the Spanish mailing list:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-spanish/
Por favor, pregunte a su pregunta en la lista de correo español:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-spanish/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:47:02 +0100
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hola, this is an English Forum.
> Cheers, Jerome
It pains me, especially at this Xmas time, to see this kind of un-helpful
rebuke given without any sort of useful reply to the original query, or at
least some pointer where the enquirer
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:15:05 -0500
JAWV WV wrote:
> por ejemplo instalé la
> versión 7.7.0 y dentro de 5 o 6 meses la versión estable mejorada es
> liberada , me toca re-instalar o simplemente puedo actualizar la versión
> 7.7.0 para que pase a ser la 8.0.1 . Pues en verdad actualizar es instalar
Hola, this is an English Forum.
Cheers, Jerome
On 13/12/14 18:15, JAWV WV wrote:
> Hola disculpas ante todo x la pregunta es muy sencilla espero no
> quitarles mucho tiempo, mi inquietud es sobre actualizaciones en cada
> versión estable de Debian, es decir cada que sale una nueva versión
> anu
On 2014-12-13, Jape Person wrote:
>
> Would anyone happen to know if plans are afoot to eliminate use of
> /forcefsck?
>
I haven't the slightest idea, but I read somewhere recently that it
might be preferable to go the kernel parameter route, which avoids
writing to a potentially corrupted file
Hola disculpas ante todo x la pregunta es muy sencilla espero no quitarles
mucho tiempo, mi inquietud es sobre actualizaciones en cada versión estable
de Debian, es decir cada que sale una nueva versión anual o semestral,
simplemente puedo actualizar el sistema para que se renueve o toca
reinstala
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:48:41AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
Surely, it would have all been so much simpler, if the original poster
in the thread, had put the question "To what personal uses, do people
put their computers?".
What correlation need the
On 12/13/2014 10:31 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
Joel Rees writes:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Elimar Riesebieter
wrote:
> > shutdown(8)
> >
> >-F Force fsck on reboot.
>
> Sshhh. Don't remind us to read the man pages.
By the way the -F flag causes /forcefsck to
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:48:41AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> >Surely, it would have all been so much simpler, if the original poster
> >in the thread, had put the question "To what personal uses, do people
> >put their computers?".
>
> What correlation need there be be
Joel Rees writes:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Elimar Riesebieter
> wrote:
> > shutdown(8)
> >
> >-F Force fsck on reboot.
>
> Sshhh. Don't remind us to read the man pages.
By the way the -F flag causes /forcefsck to appear
--
/\ ___
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:47:55PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 12/12/2014 at 08:53 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> > When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it
> > prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every
> > encrypted email I receive. It's highly annoy
On Sat 13 Dec 2014 at 20:26:02 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Patrick Bartek [2014-12-12 20:07 -0800]:
> >
> > [...]> I prefer to manually fsck. Easier. I just do this as root before
> >> shutdown -r now:
> >>
> >> touch /forcefsck
>
Hi all,
Does anybody know how to configure Iceweasel to use the KDE printer dialog - I
found instructions on the net but they seem to be quite outdated and don't
work anymore.
Thanks a lot.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:42:47 +0100
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > I kept a Unisys 5000/90 that required 220V at 80 amps
> 17600 Watts! Unbelievable! Where are thus circuits fused?
I remember the first computer I worked with, a great 4Kb memory in ferrite
torus, that had in the middle of the c
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Patrick Bartek [2014-12-12 20:07 -0800]:
>
> [...]> I prefer to manually fsck. Easier. I just do this as root before
>> shutdown -r now:
>>
>> touch /forcefsck
>>
>> On booting, fsck is run on all partitions, then the empty file
>>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:04:02AM -0500, detwy...@riseup.net wrote:
> > ... clicking on the date on the top panel should display my
> > appointments from Evolution...
>
> Is this documented? Please provide a reference
If you have Gnome installed and Online Accounts configured; usually Evolution
On Saturday 13 December 2014 05:47:25 Ric Moore wrote:
> Our computers are the worst of
> mistresses.
Logical, consistent, predictable, biddable ... oh yes, and demanding. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
* Patrick Bartek [2014-12-12 20:07 -0800]:
[...]> I prefer to manually fsck. Easier. I just do this as root before
> shutdown -r now:
>
> touch /forcefsck
>
> On booting, fsck is run on all partitions, then the empty file
> forcefsck is deleted. So, this only works for that particular boot.
* Ric Moore [2014-12-12 18:07 -0500]:
[...]
> I kept a Unisys 5000/90 that required 220V at 80 amps
17600 Watts! Unbelievable! Where are thus circuits fused?
Elimar
--
Obviously the human brain works like a computer.
Since there are no stupid computers humans can't be stupid.
There are ju
On 2014-12-12, Brian wrote:
>
> You have a very strange idea of what constitutes data. Here are some
> more data (or non-data if you prefer :) ),
>
He also says nothing about what forced him to reinstall so many times, nor
why he concludes it is due to an absence of fsck file system checks,
thus
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:36:58 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> What is the way to install Debian onto a software raid?
I have installed 7.7.0-64 from the DVD without any problem.
So it might be something in Testing ?
Did you try to install from a Live-CD/DVD ? ISTR that in that case you must add
dm
After two of my hard disks failed, I decided to use a software raid in
future and tried to install Debian Testing on the raid. The configuration
of the raid and software installation went well until I tried to install
the bootloader. Both Grub and Lilo refused to install.
If it is not possible t
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:53:59 -0500
Ric Moore wrote:
> On 12/12/2014 06:30 PM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:07:03 -0500
> > Ric Moore wrote:
> >
> >> So maybe we could consider a standard for "home computer" that it
> >> "runs on 110V with less than X amount of watts"?
>
On 12/12/2014 2:35 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 12.12.2014 06:13, seeker5528 a écrit :
Personally I would prefer software X gets a poke in the arm and a
message indicating network status changed, screen orientation changed,
configuration changed here, there was an event in so
40 matches
Mail list logo
