On Saturday 16 August 2014 23:33:54 Charlie wrote:
> That's also what I thought? But I assume this thread is pertaining to
> the person who installs the software through the installer. Rather than
> just a bare bones Debian without any GUI that will boot. Then through
> CLI just install the softwar
On 20140814_1035-0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Paul E Condon
> wrote:
> >
> > In English, both 'stop job' and 'stopped job' are an adjective
> > modifying a noun. The noun in both cases is 'job'. 'stop job' is a
> > noun phrase expressing a type of job, and must be some kin
> > What wine packages do you have installed?
>
> wine
> wine64
> wine32:i386
Tried that. I do not know about the firefox setup but no .exe's I had
around
would take. I also go rid of the ~/.wine. Wine-cfg also barked.
Just to be sure you have a clean environment, you might want to try
cr
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:32:23 +0100 Lisi Reisz sent:
> > Here's an idea: Why not give users a choice (if they want it) after
> > they have installed the OS? Or even before? Installation of a
> > desktop environment shouldn't be obligatory.
>
> It isn't.
>
> Lisi
That's also what I thought? But
Am 16.08.2014 23:54, schrieb Joe:
> Aug 16 00:02:03 jresid systemd[2913]: systemd-exit.service: main
> process exited, code=exited, status=200/CHDIR
> Aug 16 00:02:03 jresid systemd[2913]: Failed to start Exit the Session.
Apparently that service failed with exit code 200 / CHDIR.
src/core/exec
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:57:17 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 21:32:23 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
> > > On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
> > > > Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable
> > >
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 21:32:23 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
> > > Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
> > > requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:39:03 +0100
Joe wrote:
>
> This is a can of worms, and I hereby abandon it.
OK, I lied. I was bored...
A little further on... journald *has* been keeping persistent journals,
but with different user permissions, now root:systemd-journal 640.
journalctl still shows entr
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 17:27:27 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 16/08/14 02:56 PM, Brian wrote:
> >On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >>On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
> >>>The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
> >>>popular choice or
On 16/08/14 02:56 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
popular choice or give you the choice of desktop environments as part of
the install proces
On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
> On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
> > Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
> > requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
>
> fvwm is wonderful, but not likely to make i
On Saturday 16 August 2014 19:14:01 John Holland wrote:
> Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
> requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
Sorry, I left that one out. It was in the etc.! I knew that I had not got a
complete list.
But the
On Saturday 16 August 2014 18:01:40 Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Anyway, I think the installer should offer *all* the DEs.
*All*, including Mate and Cinnamon and Trinity and Unity, in addition to
Gnome, KDE, LXDE, Xfce, and . etc. ??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@list
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
> Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
> requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
fvwm is wonderful, but not likely to make it into d-i. Back in 1996 it
was a default (on Red Hat at
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> > The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
> > popular choice or give you the choice of desktop environments as part of
> > the install process.
> >
> I'm fully
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT), Michael Biebl wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10
On 16/08/14 17:49, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
My main objection to GNOME as the default desktop environment is
that it *requires* 3D graphics acceleration from the X driver,
something which is not available from all drivers. (For example,
t
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:49:23 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
> > > interface for jess
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT), Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> My main objection to GNOME as the default desktop environment is
>> that it *requires* 3D graphics acceleration from the X driver,
>> ...
>
> Not quite true. On g
Hi.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 03:00:59 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I'm wondering if "apt-get install" could be set up to compile from
> source and install that (sort of automatically), rather than install
> the binary?
apt-get, to my best knowledge, can not be used for this.
There's tool called a
Am 16.08.2014 17:00, schrieb Stephen Powell:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
>>
>> I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
>> interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
>> highlighter for some of the default menus i
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
> I've never been a fan of Gnome although this stems mainly from my
> preference for Konqueror and Dolphin as file managers. They both have
> options that I find very helpful, like actually listing the files you
> are about to delete instead of just telling you h
I've never used gentoo sorry.
I'm wondering if "apt-get install" could be set up to compile from
source and install that (sort of automatically), rather than install
the binary?
Due to admining a number of machines for a small non profit human
rights association (and a few personal boxen for myse
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
> >
> > I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
> > interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
> > highlighter for so
On 16/08/14 11:00 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
highlighter for some of the default menus in the new Xf
Hi all
How to compile busybox in static mode, adding some utility different
from the usual, -dd, cat, other,... -, example, partimage, with all the
dependencies, compress it, and install on a usb stick?
Thanks
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:30:24PM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> [...]
> > My apologies, I forgot that you need a newer version of
> > cciss_vol_status than present in Squeeze/Wheezy. For that I had
> > imported 1.10-1 into our local repository, which works just fine
> > without any adjustments /
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:59 PM, david wrote:
> I.m starting to get the picture but we have moved away from what I think was
> the prime motive for this trhead to be started.
>
> User 65534 is causing a frustrating 90 - 120 second delay during shutdown.
> That's 6 to 9 hrs a year!
>
> Can this del
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
>
> I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
> interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
> highlighter for some of the default menus in the new Xfce to a brighter
> color. Thanks for
Jonas Lippuner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Debian users,
Ever since the xserver on Debian Testing was upgraded to 1.16 (and
after the issue with the lacking Nvidia driver was fixed), I've been
having rendering issues.
Sometimes (it randomly comes and goes), some win
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:59:24 +0200
david wrote:
> Can this delay be eliminated? After all it did not used to happen before
> systemd was implemented.
OP is running Sid. So there are problems with stability in the unstable
version of Debian... and? ...
Oh well.
ps -u 65534
will show any ra
david writes:
> User 65534 is causing a frustrating 90 - 120 second delay during
> shutdown.
Some process that happens to be running as "nobody" is failing to exit
when instructed to do so. Systemd is waiting patiently for 90 seconds
before sending it a "kill -9". You need to either find that pr
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Jessie (last testing version) does not want to install in a VM. It just
> get stucked
If it regards Jessie, probably debian-testing [1] is a better place where
to post it.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
--
To UNSUB
Hi,
Jessie (last testing version) does not want to install in a VM. It just
get stucked
at "select and install software" with "installation failed you can skip
it and
choose something else if you want".
Anybody had the same issue and solved it ?
Thank you,
--
“One original thought is worth a t
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Reco wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:17:50 +0100
> Joe wrote:
>
>> I have /usr/sbin/nologin also. This is up-to-date sid with systemd,
>> which may not have the same defaults as previous distributions.
>
> Curious. And what shell do they set now for users with uid
I.m starting to get the picture but we have moved away from what I think
was the prime motive for this trhead to be started.
User 65534 is causing a frustrating 90 - 120 second delay during
shutdown. That's 6 to 9 hrs a year!
Can this delay be eliminated? After all it did not used to happen bef
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 16.08.2014 11:36, schrieb Reco:
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:17:50 +0100
>> Joe wrote:
>>
>>> I have /usr/sbin/nologin also. This is up-to-date sid with systemd,
>>> which may not have the same defaults as previous distributions.
>>
>> Curio
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:51:28 +0200
Michael Biebl wrote:
> base-passwd (3.5.30) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> [ Colin Watson ]
> ..
> * Change the shell of all global static users other than root (which
> retains /bin/sh) and sync (as /bin/sync is rather harmless) to
> /usr/sbin/nologi
Am 16.08.2014 11:36, schrieb Reco:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:17:50 +0100
> Joe wrote:
>
>> I have /usr/sbin/nologin also. This is up-to-date sid with systemd,
>> which may not have the same defaults as previous distributions.
>
> Curious. And what shell do they set now for users with uid < 100?
>
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:17:50 +0100
Joe wrote:
> I have /usr/sbin/nologin also. This is up-to-date sid with systemd,
> which may not have the same defaults as previous distributions.
Curious. And what shell do they set now for users with uid < 100?
I've checked more-or-less fresh testing with sy
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:56:53PM -0400, Stephen L. Novak wrote:
>
>
> I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
> interface for jessie too.
Your vote has no affect whatsoever on what the default DE will be.
The only way you can influence the decision is to install
popu
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:00:08 +0400
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:44:31 +0200
> david wrote:
>
> > I have been bothered by this too.
> >
> > KUser shows this user as "nobody" whose home directory is
> > "/nonexistent" and whose login shell is /usr/sbin/nologin.
> >
> > The ac
42 matches
Mail list logo
