> Simply that, if you intend to take i3, you will have to learn to think
> differently. My opinion is that tiling wm are far more efficient than
> classic stacking window managers, but it indeed changed my habits. Since
> then, for example, I do not use any file explorer, they are slower than
> com
> Defining "desktop" is the tricky bit (to some it only means where the
> box sits). In this instance I've assumed the OP means office apps, bit
> of gaming, internet apps - so I'd go go for a two slice setup, with a
> separate / and /home, with and a swap file. For a similar "desktop" in a
> busin
Hello, I am contacting you because I am confronted with the impossibility
to install Linux on my computer because it has a 32-bit UEFI (without
Legacy BIOS mode, although the processor is an x64) and all distributions
Linux compatible EFI is 64-bit. My computer is a netbook Packard Bell
easynote ME
On 07/02/14 14:25, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 07/02/14 14:07, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> CC'ing debian-boot
>>
>> Seems as though Roelof is now in space trouble.
>> He says he followed the d-i's suggestions
>> Thread starts here:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/02/msg00269.html
>>
>> On
On 07/02/14 14:07, Chris Bannister wrote:
> CC'ing debian-boot
>
> Seems as though Roelof is now in space trouble.
> He says he followed the d-i's suggestions
> Thread starts here:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/02/msg00269.html
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:08:39PM +, Roelof Wo
CC'ing debian-boot
Seems as though Roelof is now in space trouble.
He says he followed the d-i's suggestions
Thread starts here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/02/msg00269.html
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:08:39PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> > Was that the default partitioning layout s
On 02/06/2014 09:23 PM, Renaud15000 . wrote:
Hello, I am contacting you because I am confronted with the
impossibility to install Linux on my computer because it has a 32-bit
UEFI (without Legacy BIOS mode, although the processor is an x64) and
all distributions Linux compatible EFI is 64-bit.
Le 06.02.2014 22:09, Tom H a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:56 AM,
wrote:
Le 05.02.2014 13:53, Tom H a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM,
wrote:
Le 02.02.2014 23:27, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Le 02.02.2014 21:46, Tom H a écrit :
Regarding the partitions, a gpt lab
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
> Le 05.02.2014 13:53, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM, wrote:
>>> Le 02.02.2014 23:27, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Le 02.02.2014 21:46, Tom H a écrit :
>> Regarding the partitions, a gpt label allows 128 primary partiti
On 02/06/2014 07:54 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> The idea may seems, and probably is, quite strange.
>
> But I have seen for now 2 uses for it (there probably are more than
> those ones).
> _ Building a DE which would be a complete IDE, even for command line
> users as me. Those of y
I am stuggling to understand how to get the dynamic list overlay working
using OpenLdap
It uses the online version of configuring slapd, and all the
instructions on the internet seems to assume an older version with
slapd.conf file.
I have manage to configure the module part to include dynli
The idea may seems, and probably is, quite strange.
But I have seen for now 2 uses for it (there probably are more than
those ones).
_ Building a DE which would be a complete IDE, even for command line
users as me. Those of you which have written more than 500 lines of code
knows that there ex
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Get list of installed packages
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <52f388e4.6000...@gmail.com>
On 06/02/14, Tino Sino (robottinos...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
> 2) dpkg --get-
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 14:50 +0200, andrey.ry...@bilkent.edu.tr wrote:
> hi community.
> i installed new hardware to my my computer. Namely ide cd-dvd rw. The
> device is presenting in /dev directory but i can not see it in file
> manager. i can not use it. What is correct way to install new hardwa
On 6 February 2014 15:58, John W. Foster wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 14:50 +0200, andrey.ry...@bilkent.edu.tr wrote:
>> hi community.
>> i installed new hardware to my my computer. Namely ide cd-dvd rw. The
>> device is presenting in /dev directory but i can not see it in file
>> manager. i can
On 06/02/2014 13:06, Tino Sino wrote:
> I wonder, what's the golden way to do this and why?
It depends on what you're doing it for. If it's for a script, dpkg-query
is a better choice, because you can do --showformat
and it does not truncate version strings etc. 'dpkg -l' output
is really meant fo
On 06/02/2014 13:12, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> (you could use grep -e '^ii') or egrep '^ii', but I think it's not
> worth the cpu used).
You don't need -e to use anchors in the regex. Whilst -e would use more
CPU than a plain grep, the anchor would likely reduce the work done
(lines can be matche
Op donderdag 6 februari 2014 14:10:03 UTC+1 schreef andrey...@bilkent.edu.tr:
> i installed new hardware to my my computer. Namely ide cd-dvd rw. The
> device is presenting in /dev directory but i can not see it in file
> manager. i can not use it. What is correct way to install new hardware to
>
On 06/02/2014 14:06, Tino Sino wrote:
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
<(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
On 02/06/2014 08:17 AM, iijima yoshino wrote:
> ?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
> Tino Sino :
>
>> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
>> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
>> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
>> 3) ... etc ...
>> Given that the out
?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
Tino Sino :
> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
> 3) ... etc ...
> Given that the output is the same:
> $ diff \
> <(dpkg --get-selec
Tino Sino writes:
> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
> 3) ... etc ...
> Given that the output is the same:
> $ diff \
> <(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
>
> Was that the default partitioning layout suggested by the installer?
Yes, it is.
> I notice that you only have 85M free under / which includes /lib.
> e.g.
> root@tal:~# du -h /lib/modules/ | tail -n 3
> 81M /lib/modules/3.2.0-4-686-pae/kernel
> 84M /lib/modules/3.2.0-4-686-pae
> 84M /lib/mod
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
<(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
<(dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { pri
hi community.
i installed new hardware to my my computer. Namely ide cd-dvd rw. The
device is presenting in /dev directory but i can not see it in file
manager. i can not use it. What is correct way to install new hardware to
debian machine? I have newest debian on my computer.
Thanks in advance,
A
hi community.
i installed new hardware to my my computer. Namely ide cd-dvd rw. The
device is presenting in /dev directory but i can not see it in file
manager. i can not use it. What is correct way to install new hardware to
debian machine? I have newest debian on my computer.
Thanks in advance,
A
Hi
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:07:16AM +, Luis Suzuki wrote:
> When I needed to build a package from debian sources I used to:
> bzcat ../debianpackage.diff.gz | patch -p1 from within the original
> source.Then:
> debuild.And everything went smoothly.
>
> Now I do (and does not work):
>
> Fro
On 06/02/2014 00:07, Luis Suzuki wrote:
> And does not work.What am I doing wrong?
What error message do you get?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f3
On 06/02/14 22:57, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:31:57AM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
On 02/05/2014 04:16 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> When I did today apt-get dist-upgrade it fails with this message :
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> (Reading database ... 1
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:31:57AM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> >> On 02/05/2014 04:16 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> >>> When I did today apt-get dist-upgrade it fails with this message :
> >>>
> >>> Preconfiguring packages ...
> >>> (Reading database ... 146026 files and directories currently instal
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:31:57AM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> >> On 02/05/2014 04:16 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
[cut]
>
> df -h gives this :
>
> /dev/sda1 315M 210M 85M 72% /
Here's your problem. The package is trying to write to /lib, which will
be on this partition. "apt-ca
On 6 February 2014 08:31, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:35:47 -0500
>>> From: deb...@paulscrap.com
>>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>> Subject: Re: upgrade problem
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2014 04:16 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
On 06/02/14 21:32, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 06.02.2014 11:03, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
>> On 06/02/14 20:09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 05.02.2014 19:31, John Hasler a écrit :
yaro wrote:
> Separate /usr is unneeded and actually complicates b
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
>
>
> Le 06.02.2014 11:13, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > On Thursday 06 February 2014 05:43:45 Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
> >> I want to know what is the basic difference between *apt*, as in
> >> /apt update/ and *apt-get*, as in /apt-get update/.
> >
> > C
Le 06.02.2014 11:03, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 06/02/14 20:09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 05.02.2014 19:31, John Hasler a écrit :
yaro wrote:
Separate /usr is unneeded and actually complicates boot for little
benefit.
It allows you to mount it read-only (or not at all when
Le 06.02.2014 11:13, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
On Thursday 06 February 2014 05:43:45 Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
I want to know what is the basic difference between *apt*, as in
/apt update/ and *apt-get*, as in /apt-get update/.
Can one do ? I have never heard of it, which could
easily
be my ign
On Thursday 06 February 2014 05:43:45 Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
> I want to know what is the basic difference between *apt*, as in
> /apt update/ and *apt-get*, as in /apt-get update/.
Can one do ? I have never heard of it, which could easily
be my ignorance, but Google can't find it either. If
On 06/02/14 20:09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 05.02.2014 19:31, John Hasler a écrit :
>> yaro wrote:
>>> Separate /usr is unneeded and actually complicates boot for little
>>> benefit.
>>
>> It allows you to mount it read-only (or not at all when there's a
>> problem). It only
Le 05.02.2014 15:08, Anubhav Yadav a écrit :
I do not know for awesome, but for i3, the reason could be to avoid
learning
a new way of thinking. I3 is not only efficient in a memory and CPU
point of
view, but also in term of user's time, if you learn how to use it.
Tiling Wm
are different fr
Le 05.02.2014 19:31, John Hasler a écrit :
yaro wrote:
Separate /usr is unneeded and actually complicates boot for little
benefit.
It allows you to mount it read-only (or not at all when there's a
problem). It only complicates boot due to the practice of putting
stuff
that belongs under /
2014-02-06 8:42 GMT+01:00 Chris Bannister :
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:20:12AM +0100, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> > 2014-02-05 Andrei POPESCU :
> >
> > > On Du, 02 feb 14, 13:58:54, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What about running 32 bit windows and apps in wine or VMWare?
> > >
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:35:47 -0500
>> From: deb...@paulscrap.com
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: upgrade problem
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/05/2014 04:16 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>>> When I did today apt-get dist-upgrade it fails with this
42 matches
Mail list logo
