Greetings, everybody.
I wonder who else sees this at the moment on systems running Jessie. I know
that running the testing version will require bug fixing sometimes, I don't
mind that. I just need some help to understand what's wrong. I am running
XCFE4, some of the problems I see may be specific
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:27 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:33 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> > I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> > time of the WD Green drives.
>
> Again that misinformation :(.
>
> The only issue is bad Linux code, e.g. gv
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:33 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> time of the WD Green drives.
Again that misinformation :(.
The only issue is bad Linux code, e.g. gvfs makes them spin down and up
again and again, but if you remove gvf
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Andreas Meile wrote:
> I tried that out on a lab system where I replaced pam_unix.so into
> pam_unix2.so inside both common-auth and common-password config
> files.
>
> Result: The system nows recognizes all $2a$ (Blowfish) password
> hashes but does not longer accepts $6$ (SH
On May 30, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
> Several people on blogs have recommended its use but WD says don't.
I'm sorry I don't have an actual answer from personal experience, but I would
like to think if WD says not to use it, then I would probably avoid it.
Noah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 05/30/2013 04:19 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 31/05/13 11:03, Lisi Reisz wrote:
That's a dangerously selective quote. The "for all you know, " is rather
significant.
Oh, come off it! Dangerous? All he said was that the choice of those
particular words, that particular mode of expression h
On 31/05/13 11:03, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> That's a dangerously selective quote. The "for all you know, " is rather
>> > significant.
> Oh, come off it! Dangerous? All he said was that the choice of those
> particular words, that particular mode of expression had made his
> evening. "for all you
On Thursday 30 May 2013 23:50:08 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 31/05/13 08:19, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
> > It's really simple - do you have the source code of this wdidle.exe
> > utility? What about running this wdidle.exe on Linux?
> > If both are 'yes', well, good for you.
> > If both are 'no'
On 31/05/13 08:19, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
> It's really simple - do you have the source code of this wdidle.exe
> utility? What about running this wdidle.exe on Linux?
> If both are 'yes', well, good for you.
> If both are 'no' - for all you know, it WILL brick your harddrive,
> steal all f
Hi,
Dňa 30.05.2013 22:19 recovery...@gmail.com wrote / napísal(a):
> it WILL brick your harddrive,
> steal all food from your fridge, and will do unspeakable things to
> kittens.
these words are reason, why i love the people around of free software
(and associated MLs) :-)))
I see that you are
Hi all,
I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
Digital emphatically states that that utility in only for about 3
"not-WD1
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:50:06 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
> I do not use gvs (nor any g*) because of dependdencies and I do not trust it.
>
> As a grpahical tool I use smb4k, but it seems unable to do kerberos
> authentication nor automatically mount a mount point at start of
> session
Hi.
Looks
On 05/30/13 13:14, David Christensen wrote:
I don't see any traditional HDD ports, but I do see "Full-size mini PCI
Express* with mSATA support". I assume I will need an mSATA SDD
Yes.
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/dc3217iye/sb/CS-033954.htm
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:34:58 -0700
Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
> of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
> Digital emp
debian-user:
Does Debian run on the Intel Next Unit of Computing platform?
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/motherboards/desktop-motherboards/nuc.html
I don't see any traditional HDD ports, but I do see "Full-size mini PCI
Express* with mSATA support". I assume I will need an mSATA SDD,
Hi all,
I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
Digital emphatically states that that utility in only for about 3
"not-WD1
On Thursday 30 May 2013 15:10:17 Sladjan Ri wrote:
> I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
> the console in X.
> http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
I have sometimes had that problem with the virtual terminal when using LXDE.
Most irritating. So far as
Hi, I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
the console in X.
http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
My ~./fonts.config looks like this:
http://pastebin.com/P8qVZmYG
How can I fix this please?
Regards,
Sladi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I upgraded my Squeeze VM setup to Wheezy and found a problem that I can't seem
to solve. I use ODBC (tdsodbc) but when dist-upgrading, I had some problems
with odbcinst1debian2. I don't recall the exact error message as I solved
the problem by re
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:09 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:38:11 +0100
> Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >GNOME & KDE somewhat increase the fragmentation.
>
> I'm (reasonably) sure they're not the only people of working to their
> own end.
>
On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:38:11 +0100
Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>GNOME & KDE somewhat increase the fragmentation.
I'm (reasonably) sure they're not the only people of working to their
own end.
{snip}
>as if, GNOME was somehow special and deserved special treatmen
On Thu, 30 May 2013 13:38:15 +0700
Sthu Deus wrote:
Hello Sthu,
>Oh! I would long time look for the reason! - Restart really made the
>trick! Thanks again!
NP. Glad it proved easy to resolve.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immedi
On 30/05/13 10:50, Erwan David wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:30:33AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
Hi have followi
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:30:33AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
> > said:
> > > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > > Hi have following line in my /etc/f
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
> said:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> > > //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> >
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> > //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> > defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
> >
> > mount
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
>
> mounting works flawlessly, unsing the ticket obtained through pam_krb5 at
>
On 29/05/13 11:59, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:47:55 +0100
> Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Matej,
>
>> The reason seems to be that, from now on, GNOME cannot be installed
>> without PackageKit. :-/
>
> Oh dear. Maybe removal of the GNOME
On 30/05/13 09:57, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Kali is a modified Debian wheezy. It only has a root account.
Sounds like kali is a rather specialised distro, and should only really
be used as necessary for its intended purpose of penetration testing and
security research. Better to use a more conventional
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 07:10 -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> * From: Andrei POPESCU
> * Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:31:42 +0300
> > I doubt there is any general Debian policy of using OpenSSL rather than
> > GnuTLS.
>
> OK; thanks.
>
> > If a particular software can use both it's usuall
Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
//server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
mounting works flawlessly, unsing the ticket obtained through pam_krb5 at login.
However
umount /mnt/it leads to :
umount: only root can
31 matches
Mail list logo
