On 2013/02/09 6:52 AM, lina wrote:
Hi,
Is skype stable under the Debian?
I have not installed, but I am kinda of needing it for a video call.
Will it easily be crashed, I have never tried, so ask ahead.
Works great for me in Wheezy/sid, much more stable than it used to be
(with earlier Skyp
2013-02-09 05:52, lina skrev:
Is skype stable under the Debian?
Works well enough and is stable enough for me. You can always uninstall
it if you find problems.
/ johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:19:31 +1300
Chris Bannister wrote:
> [...]
>
> Start looking here:
>
> root@tal:~# less /etc/sysctl.conf
> [...]
>
> # Uncomment the following to stop low-level messages on console
> #kernel.printk = 3 4 1 3
> [...]
Looks interesting, although from what I understood from
Hi,
Is skype stable under the Debian?
I have not installed, but I am kinda of needing it for a video call.
Will it easily be crashed, I have never tried, so ask ahead.
Thanks for your answer,
Best regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Alois Mahdal wrote:
> Hello && GTOTD,
>
> I'm trying to make sense of some kernel driver code and I noticed some
> `pr_warning()` calls.
>
> From kernel.h I know pr_warning is an `eprintf()` macro:
>
> #define pr_warning(fmt, ...) \
> epr
- Original Message -
From: Joe
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 2/8/2013 9:03:30 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] computer security (online) training
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:48:45 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Cutting to the chase... after googling around I see there are many
> many
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Sorry for taking advantage of the list a bit but as happens pretty
> often, this list is more likely to provide useful info on the subject.
>
> I want to begin some training in computer security... training I can
> do online... and hopefully a
Did you try apt-get -f install ? I've used that as well, making
careful note of what it is about to do (so I could reinstall things it
may uninstall to get itself sorted out). You could also try it with
the --dry-run option.
--b
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hi folks,
On 1/23/13, David Guntner wrote:
> Alois Mahdal grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>> I wonder if there already is a solution for this:
...
> One of the machines on my home network is my Linux server, running
> Debian Squeeze. I've got Postfix installed for the MTA
same here
> and Procmail installed
On 02/08/2013 10:44 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Peter Viskup:
viskup@viskup:~$ awk '/Name|VmSize|VmPeak/' /proc/4186/status
Name: gnome-shell
VmPeak: 3537456 kB
VmSize: 3403068 kB
I am not sure, but I suspect you misinterpret those numbers. This is the
amount of memory that the application th
Peter Viskup:
>
> viskup@viskup:~$ awk '/Name|VmSize|VmPeak/' /proc/4186/status
> Name: gnome-shell
> VmPeak: 3537456 kB
> VmSize: 3403068 kB
I am not sure, but I suspect you misinterpret those numbers. This is the
amount of memory that the application thinks is available for itself.
This doe
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:48:45 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Cutting to the chase... after googling around I see there are many
> many computer security training sites and companies. I need a little
> guidance to paring them down with my main criteria being hands on
> training.
>
Without having
On 02/08/2013 03:12 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Peter Viskup wrote:
viskup@viskup:~$ uptime
11:10:57 up 16 days, 17:01, 10 users, load average: 1.61, 1.34, 1.07
I'm not sure what this is supposed to demonstrate. Has gnome-shell been running
for 16 days?
On 02/08/2013 06:09 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
viskup@viskup:~$ awk '/Name|VmSize|VmPeak/' /proc/4186/status
Name: gnome-shell
VmPeak: 3537456 kB
VmSize: 3403068 kB
That doesn't show a memory leak.
Indeed, but we're talking about 3GB of memory here, which seems hard to
justify for such an ap
On Fri 08 Feb 2013 at 19:05:04 +0200, Zvi Vered wrote:
> I'm looking for DVD iso.
> The link:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r8/i386/iso-dvd/
> Does not contains any ISO files.
All you have to do is click on "Parent Directory" to start exploring.
> Can you help ?
Hopefully.
>
Hello && GTOTD,
I'm trying to make sense of some kernel driver code and I noticed some
`pr_warning()` calls.
From kernel.h I know pr_warning is an `eprintf()` macro:
#define pr_warning(fmt, ...) \
eprintf(0, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
while eprintf is defined in debug.c.
So..
>> viskup@viskup:~$ awk '/Name|VmSize|VmPeak/' /proc/4186/status
>> Name: gnome-shell
>> VmPeak: 3537456 kB
>> VmSize: 3403068 kB
> That doesn't show a memory leak.
Indeed, but we're talking about 3GB of memory here, which seems hard to
justify for such an application.
> awk '/Name|VmSize|VmP
Hello,
I'm looking for DVD iso.
The link:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r8/i386/iso-dvd/
Does not contains any ISO files.
Can you help ?
What is businesscard ISO ?
Thanks,
Zvika
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, "Morel Bérenger"
wrote:
> Le Ven 8 février 2013 7:57, Zvi Vered a é
You could use GNU units. It appears to treat SI prefixes as strictly base 10,
so use the KiB/MiB etc. variants where applicable:
> $ units 8112116KiB MiB
> * 7921.9883
> / 0.00012623094
Something like
> …2>&1| awk '/transferred/' {print $1}'|while read i; do units "${i}bytes"
> "GiB
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Peter Viskup wrote:
> Hi all,
> just want to share my bad experience with Gnome3 in testing. They
> have/had some mem-leaks in there.
>
> viskup@viskup:~$ uptime
> 11:10:57 up 16 days, 17:01, 10 users, load average: 1.61, 1.34, 1.07
I'm not sure what th
Hi all,
just want to share my bad experience with Gnome3 in testing. They
have/had some mem-leaks in there.
viskup@viskup:~$ uptime
11:10:57 up 16 days, 17:01, 10 users, load average: 1.61, 1.34, 1.07
viskup@viskup:~$ awk '/Name|VmSize|VmPeak/' /proc/4186/status
Name: gnome-shell
VmPeak:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:15:26AM +0100, "Morel Bérenger" wrote:
>
> I'm curious to look at other replies.
A good place to post would be
d-community-offto...@lists.alioth.debian.org.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving t
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:26:45PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
>This is off-topic because it's on OS/X instead of Debian, but you folks
>are the smartest, so
>The GNU dd command, when sent the -USR1 signal, pauses processing long
>enough to spit out a status line, like so:
>
> 1833
On Vi, 08 feb 13, 18:25:04, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> What a horrible email client, how do you know who wrote what?
It seems to be one of those "smart" clients that defaults to html and
inserts quoting when you try to interleave your reply. Usually switching
to plain text only helps.
Kind reg
Le Ven 8 février 2013 7:57, Zvi Vered a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> I have to download debian 3.1 for i386.
> So I went to:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/
>
>
> And clicked on: full CD sets / i386
> It seems that the link is not responding.
>
>
> Can you help ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
Le Ven 8 février 2013 8:19, s. keeling a écrit :
> Aijun Xuan :
>
>> ---485831647-466411508-1354984718=:50704
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>
>> Hello, Debian:
>>
>>
>> First of all, I would like appreciate what Debian had offered to
>> us! I would thank GUN very much!
>>
>> I a
Le Ven 8 février 2013 8:24, lina a écrit :
> On Friday 08,February,2013 08:48 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Sorry for taking advantage of the list a bit but as happens pretty
>> often, this list is more likely to provide useful info on the subject.
>>
>> I want to begin some training in computer sec
27 matches
Mail list logo
