On 01/02/13 06:48 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
I was googling for an inexpensive laptop for a friend and came across
the chromebook C710 from Acer:
http://www.staples.com/Acer-C710-2847-116-Chromebook/product_125265
or
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834215914
• Intel
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:52:24 -0800
ow...@netptc.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: sp11
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: 2/1/2013 4:40:13 PM
> Subject: Re: enlighten scribes docs, books etc
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:27:52 -0800
> james gray wrote:
- Original Message -
From: sp11
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 2/1/2013 4:40:13 PM
Subject: Re: enlighten scribes docs, books etc
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:27:52 -0800
james gray wrote:
> hello
> i have looked at past e mail going back several months ago trying to
> find
The Saturday 02 February 2013 01:36:32, Bob Proulx wrote :
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote :
> > > If the process won't die then likely it is a zombie.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_process
> > >
> > > Zombies cannot be killed because they are already dead. Th
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:41:05AM -0800, David Guntner wrote:
>
> to clean them up. Everything *except* dovecot-common went away. When
> it got to dovecot-common, it just gave me an error message. Oh, and it
> deleted /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf for me before erroring out. Oops.
This might be
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:27:52AM -0800, james gray wrote:
> would like to find any thing that has actual content and is actually
> informative in light of the OS structure and system calls in GNU Debian.
When you say "system calls" do you mean:
System calls (functions provided by the kernel)
as
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote :
> > If the process won't die then likely it is a zombie.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_process
> >
> > Zombies cannot be killed because they are already dead. The most
> > common reason they haven't left yet is because their parent pr
Szanowni Państwo,
W związku z wymogami ustawy z dnia 18 lipca 2002 roku o świadczeniu usług
drogą elektroniczną (Dz. U. Nr 144 z 9 września 2002 r., poz.1204),
chciałbym uzyskać Państwa zgodę na przesłanie informacji dotyczącej
przeniesienia numerów Państwa firmy do sieci T-mobile.
Jeśli wyraż
The Saturday 02 February 2013 00:53:48, Bob Proulx wrote :
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > Ok I got the pid of each instance of vlc. but kill +instance number does
> > not kill anything, no moe than pkill vlc!!!
>
> If the process won't die then likely it is a zombie.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Ok I got the pid of each instance of vlc. but kill +instance number does not
> kill anything, no moe than pkill vlc!!!
If the process won't die then likely it is a zombie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_process
Zombies cannot be killed because they are already
The Saturday 02 February 2013 00:34:21, Adam Wolfe wrote :
> "ps -ef | grep vlc" should show you the pids.
>
> I'd tried to 'kill' them first. If that doesn't work I usually go
> straight for a "kill -9".
> "killall vlc" might also work, but I'm not positive.
>
> On 02/01/2013 06:29 PM, Thierry
I was googling for an inexpensive laptop for a friend and came across
the chromebook C710 from Acer:
http://www.staples.com/Acer-C710-2847-116-Chromebook/product_125265
or
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834215914
• Intel Celeron 847 1.1GHz
• 2GB Memory (expandab
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 instances of vlc that I can not stop. Top does not give me their
process number. How can I get ithem to kill them with kill +process number? Or
is there athere a other way to do it?
Thierry
if you process tools installed you can:
pkill vlc
--
In theory, th
"ps -ef | grep vlc" should show you the pids.
I'd tried to 'kill' them first. If that doesn't work I usually go
straight for a "kill -9".
"killall vlc" might also work, but I'm not positive.
On 02/01/2013 06:29 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 instances of vlc that I can not stop. To
Hi,
I have 3 instances of vlc that I can not stop. Top does not give me their
process number. How can I get ithem to kill them with kill +process number? Or
is there athere a other way to do it?
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On 02/01/2013 05:17 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 19:12:04 Doug wrote:
If it worked with the DVR, it should work with the computer on the same
setting.
It doesn't on my television. DVR is a different "source" setting than VGA.
It took me a bit of fiddling to work out why I
Ok, this one I've searched like crazy for, and haven't been able to come
up with anything solid. ;-) So hopefully someone here will have dealt
with this and can give me some pointers.
I've recently installed PlayOnLinux (which personally, I think is a
really neat tool) on my squeeze system. I ru
On Friday 01 February 2013 14:23:41 Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > If you definitely have no firefox/iceweasel/similar process running and
> > it still won't start, try removing ~/.mozilla/firefox/profilename/lock
>
> ~
> but the thing is that I am removing the whole subdirectory:
> ~
> ~/.mozilla/f
On Thursday 31 January 2013 19:12:04 Doug wrote:
> If it worked with the DVR, it should work with the computer on the same
> setting.
It doesn't on my television. DVR is a different "source" setting than VGA.
It took me a bit of fiddling to work out why I hadn't got a picture.
My television m
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 11:29 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Ma, 29 ian 13, 11:20:42, Linux-Fan wrote:
>>> On 01/28/2013 11:02 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 27 ian 13, 19:12:40, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> Well, for only 4 systems puppet
On 01/30/2013 11:29 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 29 ian 13, 11:20:42, Linux-Fan wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 11:02 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Du, 27 ian 13, 19:12:40, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Well, for only 4 systems puppet might be a bit off. I´d suggest starting
with
On 01/02/13 03:29 PM, Николай wrote:
Hello! Your system is translated on the set of languages. Although
each user wants to see the system in their own language, but the disk
in addition to its native language has many language packs that 99% of
users never will be used. Why not share all of t
Hello! Your system is translated on the set of languages. Although each user
wants to see the system in their own language, but the disk in addition to its
native language has many language packs that 99% of users never will be used.
Why not share all of the disk images on the languages? For
Andrei POPESCU grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Vi, 01 feb 13, 08:41:05, David Guntner wrote:
>>
>> aptitude search '~c'
> ...
>> So, having found several packages with the above command, I did a
>>
>> aptitude purge '~p'
>
> Typo or was that the issue (you didn't mention)?
Yea, that last one
On Vi, 01 feb 13, 08:41:05, David Guntner wrote:
>
> aptitude search '~c'
...
> So, having found several packages with the above command, I did a
>
> aptitude purge '~p'
Typo or was that the issue (you didn't mention)?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and develo
On 01/02/13 16:41, David Guntner wrote:
Now, this is kind-of an odd one. I've got Dovecot2 installed on Squeeze
from squeeze-backports. Originally, I had installed Dovecot (1) from
the regular repository. However, there seems to have been one package
left in a kind-of hanging state: dovecot-c
Never mind, figured it out. :-)
--Dave
David Guntner grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Now, this is kind-of an odd one. I've got Dovecot2 installed on Squeeze
> from squeeze-backports. Originally, I had installed Dovecot (1) from
> the regular repository. However, there seems to hav
Now, this is kind-of an odd one. I've got Dovecot2 installed on Squeeze
from squeeze-backports. Originally, I had installed Dovecot (1) from
the regular repository. However, there seems to have been one package
left in a kind-of hanging state: dovecot-common from version 1. I
discovered this w
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:27:52 -0800
james gray wrote:
> hello
> i have looked at past e mail going back several months ago trying to
> find a recommend on reading`s that was asked and posted. and no i did
> not find it.
>
> i have become burnt out with the elementary, kindergarden,
> generalizatio
On 02/01/2013 10:27 AM, james gray wrote:
hello
i have looked at past e mail going back several months ago trying to
find a recommend on reading`s that was asked and posted. and no i did
not find it.
i have become burnt out with the elementary, kindergarden,
generalization, going no where reads.
hello
i have looked at past e mail going back several months ago trying to find a
recommend on reading`s that was asked and posted. and no i did not find it.
i have become burnt out with the elementary, kindergarden, generalization,
going no where reads. this is the foot pump and this is the wheel
i have heard people suggest using winbind ( i think it is a kerberos
base auth ) with samba and ldap with posfix. the question is why.
it seem more easier when i configure it for freeNAS and openfire XAMPP server.
My experience with samba and winbind was quite difficult however now
after configuri
> If you definitely have no firefox/iceweasel/similar process running and it
> still won't start, try removing ~/.mozilla/firefox/profilename/lock
~
but the thing is that I am removing the whole subdirectory:
~
~/.mozilla/firefox
~
and trying to restart iceweasel
~
lbrtchx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
I was speaking about the integrated aptitude help page, which is
using exactly same interface as info.
ah, now i understand.
at least, i think i do. i'm assuming by "exactly the same interface"
you mean they both take input from and provide output to a terminal?
since that describes practical
On Fri 01 Feb 2013 at 01:50:20 +0100, Marcin Kłapkowski wrote:
> Ok, it's really nice. But it works for one login at a time. Now I
> want start more managers with it. I need to start next xdm somehow.
> Running xdm on other tty console doesn't bring me window. Any idea how
> start few xdm login wi
On 31/01/13 20:34, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 31 ian 13, 19:38:39, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> On 31/01/13 19:15, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> [You replied to my private address, feel free to put this back on list]
>>>
>> Oops, sorry! Hereby back on the list.
>>
>>> On Jo, 31 ian 13, 19:03:17, Ton
On 31 Jan 2013, Marcin Kłapkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have Debian wheezy. I use i3 window manager, starting with xdm on
> tty7. I wanted to test other window managers without changing my basic
> config, and still using my desktop. Tried on tty6 with:
> startx /usr/bin/awesome
> it start nice, an
"Mark Allums" writes:
> Thanks for your reply. I am a bit skeptical that many distributions will be
> officially supported. Certainly Ubuntu and direct derivatives, possibly
> Debian and direct derivatives, probably Fedora and some other RPM-based
> distros such as OpenSuSE. Slackware, Arch, an
38 matches
Mail list logo
