Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Andre Majorel wrote:
> > Sneaky. I'll look if I can hack debmirror to avoid the copy.
> > Thanks.
>
> hardlinks? (assuming it's the same filesystem)
On my system with local disks I think it took less than an hour to
copy the Lenny 48G of source and binaries for i386 and am
The according aptitude command is, e.g.,
aptitude purge '~i3\.0\.1-.*'
if I'm not mistaken. '~i' searches only through installed packages.
--
Best regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
On Saturday 14 April 2012 12:20:18 pm Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:34:03 -0430, German Eduardo Jaber De Lima wrote:
> > What was the first stable Debian release that enabled PAE support
> > (bigmem kernel option)?
>
> The first?
>
> If we take we time-machine and according to the snap
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:59:02 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:03:41PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> «In the interleaved reply style (also called "inline reply", "point-by-
>> point rebuttal", or, sometimes, "bottom posting")...»
>^^
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:06:02 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:55:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> I also followed "Linux Devices¹" (linux hardware related news) but has
>> been recently adquired by a big magazine and the feeds are now gone :-(
>>
>> ¹http://www.linuxfordev
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:36:20 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sir, please, turn off html, I hardly can read your messages :-(
(correcting the quotes and trimming)
>> Then how about repartition the whole volume in small chunks? That way
>> you will limiting the available space by the partition
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:49:07 +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> Everyone who wants or needs improved HTML5-support can download Mozilla
> Firefox webbrowser here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html You get improved
> rendering-speed, the optional 'do not track' feature and more for free.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:34:03 -0430, German Eduardo Jaber De Lima wrote:
> What was the first stable Debian release that enabled PAE support
> (bigmem kernel option)?
The first?
If we take we time-machine and according to the snapshot archive¹, there
was a "-bigmem" kernel since 2.6.17 (dated o
> 2012/4/14 Roman V.Leon. :
>> Hello Gents,
>> Could you help me with my wifi card in laptop, please? I have broadcom
>> BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY controller, and I installed
>> "firmware-b43-lpphy-installer". Unfortunately when i'm trying turn my card
>> on, i'm getting a message:
>> "$ sudo ifconf
Hi list!
I have just a little question to aptitude, and I think, it can be easily
answered.
The Problem: With the command "apt-get --purge remove 3.0.1-*" I can uninstall
all packages containing 3.0.1-something. I use this for installing older
kernels and headers as well as selfbuild kernel m
2012/4/14 Roman V.Leon. :
> Hello Gents,
> Could you help me with my wifi card in laptop, please? I have broadcom
> BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY controller, and I installed
> "firmware-b43-lpphy-installer". Unfortunately when i'm trying turn my card
> on, i'm getting a message:
> "$ sudo ifconfig wlan0
Hello Gents,
Could you help me with my wifi card in laptop, please? I have broadcom
BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY controller, and I installed
"firmware-b43-lpphy-installer". Unfortunately when i'm trying turn my card
on, i'm getting a message:
"$ sudo ifconfig wlan0 up" > "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Operation no
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:53:19PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:43:51PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> > > If you don't know, please refrain from guessing!
> >
> > Refrain yourself from reading :-/
>
> I'm not at significant risk of being (unintentionally) misled by you: newbi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:03:41PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> «In the interleaved reply style (also called "inline reply", "point-by-
> point rebuttal", or, sometimes, "bottom posting")...»
^^^
> «In the "bottom-posting" style, the reply is appended to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:38:59PM -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bannister
> wrote:
>
> > But you said above, and I quote:
> >
> > 'A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the bottom"
> >
> > and now you are saying in response to
> >
> > "So
green wrote at Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:22:32 -0500
> wzab wrote at 2012-04-13 18:42 -0500:
>> A few weeks ago I've noticed, that my half year old laptop started
>> to behave strange.
>> When left unused, after the screen gets black to save power, the disks
>> starts to click every few minutes, and afte
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:55:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> I also followed "Linux Devices¹" (linux hardware related news) but
> has been recently adquired by a big magazine and the feeds are now
> gone :-(
>
> ¹http://www.linuxfordevices.com/
It seems to be back:
http://www.linuxfordevices.com
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:40:26 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> Joe wrote :
> > only TCP and UDP have 'ports'
>
> No. ICMP does not have ports, but other protocols such as SCTP and
> DCCP have ports too.
>
>
Yes, I do realise there are others, but they are not among the
half-dozen or so which
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:27:06 -0400 (EDT), Eduardo Bearzoti wrote:
>
> I'd like to thank the kind replies of Bob and Daniel.
> With regard to their suggestions, they might like to know that:
>
> - changing 'nvidia' for 'vesa' unfortunately didn't help;
>
> - I had memtest86+ run for a long time,
14.04.2012 07:49, Andreas Glaeser kirjoitti:
> Everyone who wants or needs improved HTML5-support can download Mozilla
> Firefox
> webbrowser here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
> You get improved rendering-speed, the optional 'do not track' feature and
> more for
> free.
> Inst
On Sb, 14 apr 12, 12:29:57, wzab wrote:
>
> So the problem is why there is a difference between work on local keyboard
> (no unloading/loading due to entering the idle state) and remote work?
> I'd like to prevent the disk from entering the idle state, when working
> remotely...
Probably the ke
On Sb, 14 apr 12, 10:54:54, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
> 2012-04-14 10:52, Johan Grönqvist skrev:
>
> >I assume this kind of search would require downloading the changelog for
> >each upgradable package, and looking at all entries that are more recent
> >than the installed version, then returning a ma
On Sb, 14 apr 12, 00:27:06, Eduardo Bearzoti wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to thank the kind replies of Bob and Daniel. With regard to
> their suggestions, they might like to know that:
>
> - changing 'nvidia' for 'vesa' unfortunately didn't help;
>
> - I had memtest86+ run for a long time, and no
>> to find how often the head get unloaded, I have completely prevented
>> this effect to occur.
>Notice that you have 2 problems:
>1- Unloading.
>2- Reloading.
>From where I stand, the unloading is normal, harmless, and even
>desirable so the real problem is: why is it re-loaded every 3 minutes?
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
> > Easy depriorizing is possible by outright dropping incoming ICMP packets
> > in the iptables layer, before it is processed by the IP stack.
>
> iptables is not before the IP stack, it is a part of it.
I suppos
Hello,
> Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
>> now the problem part is i want to ping outside host to verify the
>> connectivity of internet for that all the time i have to open the SSH
>> the console and ping. but what i want is, i should also ping it from
>> host computers as well. however i don't
Hello,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
>
> Easy depriorizing is possible by outright dropping incoming ICMP packets
> in the iptables layer, before it is processed by the IP stack.
iptables is not before the IP stack, it is a part of it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
2012-04-14 10:52, Johan Grönqvist skrev:
I assume this kind of search would require downloading the changelog for
each upgradable package, and looking at all entries that are more recent
than the installed version, then returning a match to the search if any
of those versions are marked priority
Hi,
I run testing and after 5 days without upgrading, I have around 100
upgradable packages. Normally, I upgrade when reaching the (arbitrarily
chosen) number 100, but I would like to have a better way of deciding
when I want to upgrade something.
What I would like to have is a way of findin
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:04:08 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i have lately installed SQUID proxy and to avail all the facilities
> i am using it as Proxy mod not as Transparent mode neither i wanted
> to.
>
> now the problem part is i want to ping outside host to verify the
> connectivity o
i have lately installed SQUID proxy and to avail all the facilities i am
using it as Proxy mod not as Transparent mode neither i wanted to.
now the problem part is i want to ping outside host to verify the
connectivity of internet for that all the time i have to open the SSH the
console and ping.
Then how about repartition the whole volume in small chunks? That way you
> will limiting the available space by the partition size, and this cannot
> be avoided, can be easily monitored, you will have more control over the
> resources permission...
but i am using RAID 1, and if i divide the parti
Hi!
I'd like to thank the kind replies of Bob and Daniel. With regard to their
suggestions, they might like to know that:
- changing 'nvidia' for 'vesa' unfortunately didn't help;
- I had memtest86+ run for a long time, and no ram errors were reported.
But Bob's guess that perhaps it is not a
33 matches
Mail list logo
