On 2011-11-20, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>>
>>> Start gnome-control-center, type "lock", hit enter, et voila.
>> That won't work in a localized GNOME ;-)
>>
>> In Spanish the term is "bloquear" so searching for "lock" returns no
>> results.
>
> I suppose in a localized GNOME "System configurat
On Sunday 20 November 2011 22:12:50 Richard wrote:
> Hi,
> ATI problems, I'm running as below with a bit of Sid, I hadn't spotted it ,
> but gnome-shell is still in fallback.
> Sysinfo shows VESA rs880, but I've loaded the flgrx sections from synaptic
> but on build DKMS could not build the module
On Du, 20 nov 11, 18:10:34, Camaleón wrote:
>
> I've never faced a security problem when installing over the network
How can you tell? ;)
> (Internet) and take no additional countermeasures but ensuring the net
> ISO checksum for the image I have downloaded is okay.
>
> A compromised mirror c
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>> I'm concerned on safety of install over network (the netinst) - what
>> techniques are used to protect the installed system during the very
>> process of installation?
>
>System is still not installed so what are you afraid of? :-?
>
>> Or it includ
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Harry Putnam wrote:
> On debian many of the things that would be done by user during an
> install from sources are done for you. I ended up with the main files
> at /var/lib/backuppc. which contains a whole pile of some kind of data
> files. I see them in places like cpool/
Hey all ,
I switch to E17 from Gnome3 now in Wheezy :-) , but here comes the
problem :- .
I want to use the network-manager(nm) to control of network connection
. As we all know , Debian provide 2 packages, network-manager and
network-manager-gnome
for us. Network-manager-gnome provide the **nm
John Hasler wrote at 2011-11-20 14:56 -0600:
> Ok, I;m sure someone is. If you're that someone are you using the
> "--terse" option? If not how much hassle would it be to have to add it?
> Upstream is considering non-backward-compatible changes.
I use units with the terse option in a simple cust
Tom H wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Tom H wrote:
> >> With bash, you'd edit "/etc/profile" or "~/.profile"; with zsh, no idea.
> >
> > That won't work for logins from an xdm such as gdm, kdm or lightdm.
>
> It works for gdm, at least up to v2.30.
I just tested it on Squeeze with gdm 2.20.11-4 an
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > for any other purpose. The problem of having one single location for
> > setting shell variables has been a problem for a lot of years.
>
> ...and there doesn't seem to be any interest to fix it :(
Unfortunately no. And I think (due to the FAQ entr
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> With bash, you'd edit "/etc/profile" or "~/.profile"; with zsh, no idea.
>
> That won't work for logins from an xdm such as gdm, kdm or lightdm.
It works for gdm, at least up to v2.30.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> El 2011-11-19 a las 14:55 +0800, lina escribió:
>
> (sending back to the list)
Thanks.
>
>> > - It happens with any PDF file you open or just with certain files?
>>
>> It did not pop up error when I opened any PDF file.
>>
>> The error occured wh
Hi,
ATI problems, I'm running as below with a bit of Sid, I hadn't spotted it , but
gnome-shell is still in
fallback.
Sysinfo shows VESA rs880, but I've loaded the flgrx sections from synaptic but
on build DKMS could not
build the module and it went in to a horrible loop, which eventually it came
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> I am running Sid and X thru startx.
> It appears that on restarting X the tty it uses dwells to tty8.
> I wonder why I want that feature, it's annoying.
> Found a reference to it:
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103765
> 'Ps
Ok, I;m sure someone is. If you're that someone are you using the
"--terse" option? If not how much hassle would it be to have to add it?
Upstream is considering non-backward-compatible changes.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:24:05 -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 11/20/2011 01:00 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:50:10 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> On 20.11.2011 15:45, Camaleón wrote:
Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" and turn
it off f
Israel Bravo (bravo...@gmail.com on 2011-11-20 15:42 +0200):
> How can I disable the NFSv4 on Debian Squeeze (without recompiling the
> kernel)?
man 5 nfs will tell you that you can force a specific nfs version by
adding -o nfsvers=X on the mount command line (or in /etc/fstab).
>
> Or - another
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>$ls -al /usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat
>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382472 Jul 4 16:57
>/usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat
I don’t have this file, however, I have:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 514787 2011-11-20 13:01
/usr/lib/vlc/plugins/plugins-04081e-fe8.dat
Googlin
On 2011-11-20, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> The argument is and was that the locales idiocy is and was just that, an
>> idiocy, so there is no ad hominem.
>
> Take this juvenile bickering off-list please.
Go jump in a big lake, sonny-boy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
$ls -al /usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382472 Jul 4 16:57
/usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat
$dpkg -S /usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern
/usr/lib/vlc/plugins-04041e-28.dat.
$dpkg -S plugins-04041e-28.dat
dpkg-query: no path
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:11:27PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> > Ad hominem argument. Please.
> >
> The argument is and was that the locales idiocy is and was just that, an
> idiocy, so there is no ad hominem.
Take this juvenile bickering off-list please.
--
Alan Chandler writes:
> Now I've been running it for about a week I am really starting to like
> it EXCEPT FOR ONE THING
>
> I really wish the hot spot for shrinking the desktop could be moved to
> the bottom left. I keep accidentally using it when moving to the
> browser back button. (DOES ANYO
On 2011-11-20, Go Linux wrote:
> Forget to take your meds today, Curt?
I admire the originality with which you formulate your savage put-downs,
Go.
Your intellectual honesty is on a par with your collaborator, Hugo
W.(?), who confuses an insight with an argument, and an argument with a
desperat
Hey folks,
It sounds like GNOME 3 is getting into testing. Like many of you, I
wasn't happy about it when it got into Fedora at work. However, I gave
it a try and now MUCH prefer it.
I wrote up a couple of blogs about my experience. This one describes how
to work with the new paradigm.
http://
Forget to take your meds today, Curt?
--- On Sun, 11/20/11, Curt wrote:
> From: Curt
> Subject: Re: disable Gnome 3 screen lockout
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 12:11 PM
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that's what I meant for trolling. G
On 2011-11-20, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Ad hominem argument. Please.
And by the way, where were you when she called me a troll, as her
_only_ argument?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On 2011-11-20, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Ad hominem argument. Please.
>
The argument is and was that the locales idiocy is and was just that, an
idiocy, so there is no ad hominem.
She has no counter-argument.
The rest is arm-chair psychology, I'll admit, but my _argument_ does not
now nor has i
On 11/20/2011 07:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:36 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" and turn
2011/11/20 Sthu Deus :
> Good time of the day.
>
>
> I'm concerned on safety of install over network (the netinst) - what
> techniques are used to protect the installed system during the very
> process of installation?
>
> Or it includes some risk for the install and therefore media (kind of
> disk
On 11/20/2011 01:00 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:50:10 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> On 20.11.2011 15:45, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" and turn
>>> it off from there.
>> Just use the builtin search.
>>
>> Start gnome-control-cen
Curt wrote:
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
Yeah, that's what I meant for trolling. Grow up.
The truth is someone came up with a suggestion superior to your own, and
because of your outsized vanity you couldn't handle it and had to invent
this idiocy about locales that isn't fooling anybody b
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:11:32 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that's what I meant for trolling. Grow up.
>>
>>
> The truth is someone came up with a suggestion superior to your own, and
> because of your outsized vanity you couldn't handle it and had to invent
> thi
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's what I meant for trolling. Grow up.
>
The truth is someone came up with a suggestion superior to your own, and
because of your outsized vanity you couldn't handle it and had to invent
this idiocy about locales that isn't fooling anybody but yourself
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:13:41 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I'm concerned on safety of install over network (the netinst) - what
> techniques are used to protect the installed system during the very
> process of installation?
System is still not installed so what are you afraid of? :-?
> Or it includ
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:16:44 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>> Curt, please, go trolling somewhere else.
>>
>> I already have you in my "radar" and already know that you always tend
>> to overreact when replying to my postings. Re-sigh.
>>
>>
> Out of arguments, huh?
>
> Got
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
> Curt, please, go trolling somewhere else.
>
> I already have you in my "radar" and already know that you always tend to
> overreact when replying to my postings. Re-sigh.
>
Out of arguments, huh?
Gotcha.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
Good time of the day.
I'm concerned on safety of install over network (the netinst) - what
techniques are used to protect the installed system during the very
process of installation?
Or it includes some risk for the install and therefore media (kind of
disk) is a preferred installation method?
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:24:34 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I am running Sid and X thru startx.
It appears that on restarting X the tty it uses dwells to tty8. I wonder
why I want that feature, it's annoying.
This happened from time to time also in wheezy and starting GNOME as
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:46:20 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:26:01 +, Curt wrote:
>>
>> Sigh. That's what I'm saying, that using the English term won't work in
>> some cases.
>
> But what I'm saying is that you are saying nothing we don't already
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:26:01 +, Curt wrote:
>
> Sigh. That's what I'm saying, that using the English term won't work in
> some cases.
But what I'm saying is that you are saying nothing we don't already
know. When the man said search for "lock," all intellige
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:26:01 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> problematic: the searched term has to be put in the user's language so
>> it finds a match because is a "text dependant" feature.
>
> Obviously.
Sigh. That's what I'm saying, that using the English term
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
>>> It returns nothing in Spanish when you type "lock" and hit enter. Go
>>> figure.
>>
>> I think "lock" isn't Spanish.
>
> (...)
>
> I think you didn't get it.
>
I thought you didn't.
> It's "lock" (the English term) what returns zero results inside a Sp
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:03:38 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> And localized search will of course work. I use de_DE and searching
>>> for sperren (German for "lock") does turn up the correct results.
>>
>> It returns nothing in Spanish when you type "lock" and hit enter.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:24:34 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I am running Sid and X thru startx.
> It appears that on restarting X the tty it uses dwells to tty8. I wonder
> why I want that feature, it's annoying.
This happened from time to time also in wheezy and starting GNOME as
usual (by me
On 2011-11-20, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> And localized search will of course work. I use de_DE and searching for
>> sperren (German for "lock") does turn up the correct results.
>
> It returns nothing in Spanish when you type "lock" and hit enter. Go
> figure.
I think "lock" isn't Spanish. Maybe try
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:18:47 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 20.11.2011 16:00, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Start gnome-control-center, type "lock", hit enter, et voila.
>>
>> That won't work in a localized GNOME ;-)
>>
>> In Spanish the term is "bloquear" so searching for "lock" returns no
>> results.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:42:08 +0200, Israel Bravo wrote:
> How can I disable the NFSv4 on Debian Squeeze (without recompiling the
> kernel)?
(...)
Unless I have read the man page in the wrong way, this can be done from "/
etc/default/nfs-kernel-server" by adjusting "RPCMOUNTDOPTS=--no-nfs-
versio
Hi,
I am running Sid and X thru startx.
It appears that on restarting X the tty it uses dwells to tty8.
I wonder why I want that feature, it's annoying.
Found a reference to it:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103765
'Psycho_zs' gives a solution to it: start console-kit-daemon on vt63,
On 20.11.2011 16:00, Camaleón wrote:
>> Start gnome-control-center, type "lock", hit enter, et voila.
>
> That won't work in a localized GNOME ;-)
>
> In Spanish the term is "bloquear" so searching for "lock" returns no
> results.
I obviously would assume that a Spanish speaking person would us
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:50:10 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 20.11.2011 15:45, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:36 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
>>> used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
>>
I have a (daily) cron (actually its anacron - since this is my desktop
and is powered down every night) job that attempts to take a snapshot of
a logical volume (it happens to be the one where I store embedded
virtual machines "disk" files on) to take a backup.
Almost every day, I get an error
On 20.11.2011 15:45, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:36 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
>> used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
>
> Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" a
On 20.11.2011 15:45, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:36 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
>> used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
>
> Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" a
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:36 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
> used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
Go to "System configuration → Personal sub-section → Screen" and turn it
off from there.
Greetings,
--
Ca
Hi,
Upgrade to Gnome 3 has enabled a screen lockout after inactivity. I
used to be able to find such things. How do I disable this.
TIA,
Paul Scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
How can I disable the NFSv4 on Debian Squeeze (without recompiling the
kernel)?
Or - another possibility - to disable mapping UID and GID to nobody/nogroup
?
On 11/20/2011 01:20 PM, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have you upgraded to experimental gnome-teak-tool too? If you don't,
please do it.
I have a similar problem and it was solved doing that.
El 17/11/11 15:48, DebianTR.WP escribió:
On 11/14/2011
On 20/11/11 12:10, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:35:38 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
I just did my normal sid update (every few days I do one of these) and
today I seem to have hit a problem. My screen locks solid, and input
(mouse or keyboard) no longer has any affect. Screen updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have you upgraded to experimental gnome-teak-tool too? If you don't,
please do it.
I have a similar problem and it was solved doing that.
El 17/11/11 15:48, DebianTR.WP escribió:
> On 11/14/2011 10:02 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:25:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:35:38 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I just did my normal sid update (every few days I do one of these) and
> today I seem to have hit a problem. My screen locks solid, and input
> (mouse or keyboard) no longer has any affect. Screen updates (such as
> the clock) continue.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:38:32 -0500, Dan B. wrote:
> I found why Gnome seemed to behave inconsistently regarding following
> Control-key settings in XKBOPTIONS in /etc/default/keyboard:
>
> GDM and the rest of Gnome work differently.
You mean GNOME is not respecting your default configuration?
s
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 23:48 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 09/11/11 Paul Johnson said:
>
> > Why bother with non-free software when we're talking about a technology
> > that's dying like BSD these days?
>
> 'cause people like it when their systems...work?
Given it's stability, i wouldn't
El 2011-11-19 a las 14:55 +0800, lina escribió:
(sending back to the list)
> > - It happens with any PDF file you open or just with certain files?
>
> It did not pop up error when I opened any PDF file.
>
> The error occured when I tried to extract pages out by print to file.
Okay.
> The pdfe
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:08:21 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:38 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:20:27 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>> > What's the regular full path for testing to the Xfce kioskrc?
>> >
>> > ???/xdg/xfce4/kiosk/kioskrc?
>> ^^^
>> etc
>
I just did my normal sid update (every few days I do one of these) and
today I seem to have hit a problem. My screen locks solid, and input
(mouse or keyboard) no longer has any affect. Screen updates (such as
the clock) continue.
I originally thought this was when I tried to print something
On Sb, 19 nov 11, 14:12:55, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > If the plugin has the frequency switching controls, but they don't do
> > anything please report a bug (if not already reported).
>
> To http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ and/or https://bugzilla.xfce.org/ ?
The general advise is that bugs should
On Sb, 19 nov 11, 14:46:19, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636108
>
> Thank you for that bug reference. I have to agree that ~/.profile is
> for lowest-common denominator shells (POSIX shells) and not usually
> for any other purpose. The problem of havi
66 matches
Mail list logo
