Hello,
I think I'm almost there, but I'm puzzled. I appear to have successfully set up
RAID 5 and LVM following this page:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/512
I have three 500 GB drives and they are configured like this:
/dev/sda1 is ext4 /boot
/dev/sd[abc]2 are RAID 5 forming th
Apliec roku ap vidukli puskailai dejotājai,
nopērc izcilu drinku pie bāra un noskaties erotisko šovu..
Tikko atvērts un viesus mīlošs klubs gaida tevi un tavus draugus - mēs
nešķirojam savus klientus, mums katrs ir svarīgs: vai no Latvijas, vai Londonas.
Pieņemams cenas, vācu menedžeri - deta
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Chris wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
>> I have a new installed Debian 6 system (Fujitsu Siemens tablet st4121)
>> that runs fine so far. When I set up openvpn, the tun0 device is not
>> created. /dev/net/tun exists, but ifconfig tells:
>>
>> sudo ifconfig tun0
>> tun0: Fe
But just in point of fact if possible: What *is* XFS's position
re FSCK -- just that it is excluded from the boot process,
or that it can never be run? And for whichever, does XFS
documentation offer a reason?
(I'm not insensitive to this thread's mounting frustration;
merely deranged enough to
On 27 April 2011 10:11, PMA wrote:
> I'm missing a detail here. Was the assertion re FSCK
> specifically that XFS doesn't call this exec during boot,
> or was it that under XFS, FSCK can't be called at all?
> (And -- for whichever -- why so?)
No, it's because somebody asked advice concerning w
On 04/26/2011 07:11 PM, PMA wrote:
I'm missing a detail here. Was the assertion re FSCK
specifically that XFS doesn't call this exec during boot,
or was it that under XFS, FSCK can't be called at all?
(And -- for whichever -- why so?)
My whole and only complaint is that xfs_check fails on 32 b
Hi all,
I have installed squeeze (amd64) on a HP Compaq 6730s laptop and
currently the sound is not working. It works fine in when running
Vista of the other partition.
The sound chip is Intel:
$ lspci | grep Audio
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio
Controller (
I'm missing a detail here. Was the assertion re FSCK
specifically that XFS doesn't call this exec during boot,
or was it that under XFS, FSCK can't be called at all?
(And -- for whichever -- why so?)
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/26/2011 04:44 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/26
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:11:40 +0100
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I have this stanza in /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet dhcp
> wireless-mode managed
> wireless-essid 'My ESSID'
>
> At the end of booting, the system tries to connect to the wireless
> point but after repeated
From: Wayne Topa
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:17:18 -0400
> If cups-bsd is not shown then remove the lpr package and install
> the cups-bsd package.
peter@joule:~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/lpr
lpr: /usr/bin/lpr
Bingo! Thanks. I'll try it when at home again on the weekend.
No doubt it will work with c
you know, i don't mind religious debates - vi vs emacs, mac vs
windows, iphone vs android, fibre vs iscsi, trustedbsd vs selinux,
and... xfs vs ext. however, i like an educated debate where both sides
can site specifics and hard facts and not just say 'this is better
because i say so' (yeah, stan,
On 04/26/2011 04:44 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/26/2011 9:29 AM:
On 04/26/2011 02:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I'm CC'ing back to debian-user as I believe others may find this
information useful.
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/25/2011 11:15 PM:
Stan: "Thus moving to EXT4 g
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:25:40 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark
> about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for
> most users.
Sorry, Peter -
I always did take things too literally. The first French I learnt was "Vous
prenez les choses au
On Monday 25 April 2011 12:01:58 Camaleón wrote:
> Oh, well, if you put it that way... there is no need to make a document
> for that, just send an e-mail or upload a new twitter ;-)
Quite. Another poster in fact suggested email.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/26/2011 9:29 AM:
> On 04/26/2011 02:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I'm CC'ing back to debian-user as I believe others may find this
>> information useful.
>>
>> Ron Johnson put forth on 4/25/2011 11:15 PM:
>>
>>> Stan: "Thus moving to EXT4 gains you nothing on a 32 bit ma
Hi
I've PC installed with they Debian squeezy and I need to connect myself to
my ISP which Windows server you it uses 2003, the protocol that uses the
same one is mschap-v2. Debian uses for defect pap and chap.
how can make so that my linux uses the protocol MSCHAP-V2.
thanks
Cosme
*
Chris wrote:
> I have a new installed Debian 6 system (Fujitsu Siemens tablet st4121)
> that runs fine so far. When I set up openvpn, the tun0 device is not
> created. /dev/net/tun exists, but ifconfig tells:
>
> sudo ifconfig tun0
> tun0: Fehler beim Auslesen der Schnittstelleninformation: Gerät
I have a new installed Debian 6 system (Fujitsu Siemens tablet st4121) that
runs fine so far. When I set up openvpn, the tun0 device is not created.
/dev/net/tun exists, but ifconfig tells:
sudo ifconfig tun0
tun0: Fehler beim Auslesen der Schnittstelleninformation: Gerät nicht
gefunden
(Devic
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:11:40 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
(...)
> In summary, I can get wirelss to work in this rather clunky way but I
> think there should be a better solution. I googled a suggestion to turn
> off wpasupplicant, but that doesn't help. Any ideas?
Are you using NetworkManager?
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:24:58 +0700, Alexey Salmin wrote:
(...)
> So I don't understand why this issue hapenned at all. libreoffice seems
> to work fine. I don't know exactly which functionality depends on JRE so
> I don't know if it really works or not. Probably I've seen the same
> error with OO
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:47:39PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:28:09 +, Cedric DC wrote:
>
> >> 1/ Instruct tripwire to use a real e-mail sender (whether possible)
> > I have read the "man tripwire". It's not possible to specify the
> > sender email address.
>
> Recheck
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 11:17 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Apr 2011, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> My /etc/printcap only lists a non-existing dot matrix printer
>>> and lpr works fine here.
>>>
>>> Try this
>>> ~# which lpr
>>> /usr/bi
On 2011-04-26, adris wrote:
>
> But still I'm not sure how to undo an "Always Trust" option with oracles
> JRE or OpenJDK. Probably these options are not meant to be undone :-)
In the case of Oracle's JRE, run jcontrol, click on the "Security" tab,
then click the "Certificates" button. From ther
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:35:57 +0100, kuLa wrote:
> On 26/04/11 14:27, Артём Жирков wrote:
(...)
>> then I played a little with user specific limits: (root@server2)-(~) $
>> cat /etc/security/limits.conf | grep nofile #- nofile - max
>> number of open files * softnofile 12000
>>
On 04/26/2011 11:17 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 26 Apr 2011, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
My /etc/printcap only lists a non-existing dot matrix printer
and lpr works fine here.
Try this
~# which lpr
/usr/bin/lpr
~#dpkg -S /usr/bin/lpr
cups-client: /usr/bin/lpr
If cups-client is not shown th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/11 14:27, Артём Жирков wrote:
> Hello,
> My webserver suffer from open limit in 1024 files, so I tried to
> increase it, but without much luck.
> At first, I changed sysctl value:
> (root@server2)-(~) $ cat /etc/sysctl.conf | grep fs.file
> fs
On 26 Apr 2011, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
[snip]
> My /etc/printcap only lists a non-existing dot matrix printer
> and lpr works fine here.
>
> Try this
> ~# which lpr
> /usr/bin/lpr
> ~#dpkg -S /usr/bin/lpr
> cups-client: /usr/bin/lpr
>
> If cups-client is not shown then remove the lpr package and
On 04/26/2011 09:18 AM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
Matt,
lpstat -t gives you all you wanted to know about your queues.
Thanks. t is my test file. "lp t" works. "lpr t" fails.
peter@joule:~$ lpr t
lpr: lp: unknown printer
peter@joule:~$ lpr -PHPDeskJet500 t
lpr: HPDeskJet500: unknown printe
I have this stanza in /etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet dhcp
wireless-mode managed
wireless-essid 'My ESSID'
At the end of booting, the system tries to connect to the wireless point
but after repeated attempts it reports that no DHCP offers are found.
I then do:
sudo ifd
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 22.04.2011, 21:19 +0900 schrieb Joel Rees:
> You say options, does that mean you did or did not find the browser
> certificate store dialog?
I did find it, but the trusted certificate was not in the list. I think
it is being added at another place. But I was unable to locate
On 04/26/2011 09:18 AM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
Matt,
lpstat -t gives you all you wanted to know about your queues.
Thanks. t is my test file. "lp t" works. "lpr t" fails.
peter@joule:~$ lpr t
lpr: lp: unknown printer
peter@joule:~$ lpr -PHPDeskJet500 t
lpr: HPDeskJet500: unknown printe
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:14:46 +0200
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:37:24 +1000, Steven wrote in message
> <1303792644.6192.14.camel@square>:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > I have a problem that's now beyond my expertise to fault properly. I
> > get random intermittent kernel errors. Usually w
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:36:47 +, Camaleón wrote:
> - To graphically turn off your desktop icons (while they're still
> available via nautilus) one has to enable "/apps/nautilus/preferences/
^^
Small error: that should be "disable".
> show_desktop"
Gree
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:14:52 +0200, Jasper Noe wrote:
>> Maybe you are searching for another key:
>>
>> /apps/nautilus/preferences/show_desktop [ ]
>>
>> If you toogle this "off" all your icons will vanish.
>
> I think it is still another key:
>
> /apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir
Hello
I just installed debian 6.0.1.a amd64 with net install, with a clean
install (before I had 5).
The system goes to grub and when I select the non-recovery mode
(2.6.32-5-amd64), I get a cursor that doesn't blink and no action at
all. I waited about 5-6 mins (I thought it would be checki
On 04/26/2011 02:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I'm CC'ing back to debian-user as I believe others may find this
information useful.
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/25/2011 11:15 PM:
Stan: "Thus moving to EXT4 gains you nothing on a 32 bit machine,"
Ron: It gives me the ability to do a fsck!
Only o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:14:46 +0200
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:37:24 +1000, Steven wrote in message
> <1303792644.6192.14.camel@square>:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > I have a problem that's now beyond my expertise to fault properly. I
> > g
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:14:25 +0200, Siard wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Yep, I guess multi-featured clients like Thunderbird/Icedove/Evolution
>> will do the same way :-)
>
> You apparently missed Florian's and Sven's posts. News servers like
> bofh.it mangle Reference headers, so threads a
Hello,
My webserver suffer from open limit in 1024 files, so I tried to
increase it, but without much luck.
At first, I changed sysctl value:
(root@server2)-(~) $ cat /etc/sysctl.conf | grep fs.file
fs.file-max = 12000
(root@server2)-(~) $ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
12000
then I played a little with
> I am in a hidden wireless network when I could connect in it set this
> commands in /etc/network/interfaces:
I'm pretty sure wpa_supplicant could be your friend.
Putting it down and taking another file as a configu-
ration...
Zoran
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Este e-mail es solo para recordarte que el último evento exclusivo de
Postgrados y MBA en el exterior del año, será el próximo 4 de Mayo.
Inscríbete ahora. Inscripción gratuita:
http://www.expo-postgrados.com/feria2011
Este evento solo es una vez por año, y es la mejor oportunidad que tienes
pa
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
bruno wrote:
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
I connect my PCs to internet via Verizon DSL router. When I go to
192.168.1.1 in a browser (say firefox), I am able to see all the
computers connected to this router.
However, from command line is there any way to probe fo
Matt,
> lpstat -t gives you all you wanted to know about your queues.
Thanks. t is my test file. "lp t" works. "lpr t" fails.
peter@joule:~$ lpr t
lpr: lp: unknown printer
peter@joule:~$ lpr -PHPDeskJet500 t
lpr: HPDeskJet500: unknown printer
peter@joule:~$ cat /etc/printcap
# This file was
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:37:24 +1000, Steven wrote in message
<1303792644.6192.14.camel@square>:
> Hi folks,
> I have a problem that's now beyond my expertise to fault properly. I
> get random intermittent kernel errors. Usually when the system is
> under stress.
>
> System specs;
> AMD X4 840 (Ba
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:17:35 +1000, aries...@skymesh.com.au wrote in
message <2bb513a2d80e0588f5de8da64d8f1...@skymesh.com.au>:
>
> With the linux-image-2.6.38-2-686 kernel I get hard lockups without
> any obvious reason and working with different programs on my Acer
> Aspire 3614WLCi laptop.
>
bruno wrote:
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> I connect my PCs to internet via Verizon DSL router. When I go to
>> 192.168.1.1 in a browser (say firefox), I am able to see all the
>> computers connected to this router.
>>
>> However, from command line is there any way to probe for the list of IP
I have had the same problem with that kernel and a Lenovo T60. Back to
the 2.6.32 version and no issues. Each lockup is hard and sets the
speaker into a continuous beep and the display is put in character mode
with a kernel page and register dump. Sometimes it wouldn't even run 10
minutes from b
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
I connect my PCs to internet via Verizon DSL router. When I go to
192.168.1.1 in a browser (say firefox), I am able to see all the computers
connected to this router.
However, from command line is there any way to probe for the list of IP
addresses of all the mach
On Ma, 26 apr 11, 00:14:52, Jasper Noe wrote:
>
> I think it is still another key:
>
> /apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir
(follow-up on -offtopic please)
Maybe it's just me, but showing $HOME instead of $HOME/Desktop by
default seems like a bad idea.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic d
I'm CC'ing back to debian-user as I believe others may find this
information useful.
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/25/2011 11:15 PM:
> Stan: "Thus moving to EXT4 gains you nothing on a 32 bit machine,"
>
> Ron: It gives me the ability to do a fsck!
Only on rare occasions should one _need_ to run x
50 matches
Mail list logo
